Honest Opinion
Updated April 21, 2025
Honest Opinion

Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Modules Used
- EMR
- Home Exercise Program
- Billing Software
Overall Satisfaction with WebPT
We use WebPt as our EMNR at 4 of our outpatient practices, we see patients for physical, occupational, and speech therapy. WebPt is easy to use and navigate. I think that customer service is hit or miss; you either get someone who is helpful and can direct you in the right direction or you get someone uninterested in helping and will send you an article to read (often times not on the subject you are asking help with). I also have noticed more glitches, freezing/reminders not working, unable to add patients/providers. New additions are added regularly but at an additional cost. Overall, very user-friendly and easy for practitioners to use.
Pros
- Easy to use
- Organization
- Reports
- Scheduling
Cons
- Inconsistent functionality
- More helpful customer service
- expensive
- Freezing issues
- loading issues
- Increased claim reimbursement.
- Increased compliance to state laws.
- Increased patient attendance.
Therabill has been very helpful to our clinic; although a bit more of a learning curve than WebPT, very easy once learned. Therabill makes it easy to track claims and monitor for payment. Therabill's customer service, much like WebPT, is either hit or miss as well. But, overall makes billing much easier.
Do you think WebPT delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with WebPT's feature set?
Yes
Did WebPT live up to sales and marketing promises?
No
Did implementation of WebPT go as expected?
No
Would you buy WebPT again?
Yes
WebPT Feature Ratings
Using WebPT
20 - Admin and clinical.
3 - Practice manager ( myself)
2 admin assistants
2 admin assistants
- Documentation
- HIPAA compliant software
- Ease of communication with MDs
- Authorization Management
- Report management
- Med Records
Evaluating WebPT and Competitors
Yes - Therapy Notes
Prompt
Prompt
- Integration with Other Systems
- Ease of Use
Ease of use was the most important factor for our clinic. We are focused on patient health and do not want to be bogged down learning a new system. Our front end has been able to learn very quickly the features most beneficial clinic. The system is really set up to make for an easy experience with clinicians which was most important to us in today's health field.
I would probably be sure we are locked into a price without increases. More difficult to switch platforms after transferring all patients to new EMR system.
WebPT Implementation
- Implemented in-house
Change management was minimal - n/a
- Transferring of existing patients into system
WebPT Training
Configuring WebPT
Take your time. The program is set up for easy learning.
Yes - we have customized the interface extensively - yes, very easy to use.
No - we have not done any custom code
WebPT Support
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Quick Resolution Good followup No escalation required Support cares about my success | Need to explain problems multiple times |
No, expense is high as is.
We added a clinic several years back to WebPt and the team was exceptional at helping us to get all billing and clinic information set up successfully in a timely manner.
Using WebPT
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using Familiar | None |
- Scheduling
- Case mgt
- HEP
- Occasional glitches with schedule
Yes, but I don't use it
WebPT Reliability
Integrating WebPT
- Therabill
It was an easy process. Programs are meant to work in conjunction with one another.
No advice we have only intergrated Therabill which is a product of Webpt.
Relationship with WebPT
Upgrading WebPT
Yes - Typically glitches initially and then returns to previous function ability.
- Did not notice a change
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation