Adform FLOW vs. OpenX

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Adform FLOW
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Adform, headquartered in Copenhagen, offers an independent and integrated advertising platform built for modern marketing. Its enterprise technology – Adform FLOW – harnesses user experience and a scalable, modular and open architecture, to enable management of the whole campaign life cycle. It aims to provide clients with enhanced control and transparency across advertising operations, including ownership of all data from their campaigns.N/A
OpenX
Score 1.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenX is an ad serving platform. It is sold option as a hosted solution for can be purchased as an installed application. It allows for easy inventory management , geo-targeting of ads by country, and provides statistics for each ad placement.N/A
Pricing
Adform FLOWOpenX
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Adform FLOWOpenX
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Adform FLOWOpenX
Considered Both Products
Adform FLOW
Chose Adform FLOW
Adform was in some usecases similar to Xaxis, however, client preferred to use Adform.
Chose Adform FLOW
First of all it was integrating well with our existing database and secondly costing. We were looking for specific kind of product for our marketing and sales team. Salesforce and Adobe we had also evaluated but they were not offering the customization we needed for our …
Chose Adform FLOW
They do not have quite the same case use so a comparison can not be made in a perfect manner. Having said this, Adform FLOW really surprises in its capability to be up to par with one of the best in class for Ad Management as well as having a bit more integrations in its …
OpenX
Chose OpenX
OpenX is less focused than Mopub and it has a bigger reach as it is not limited to the mobile app. Unlike Mopub that focuses on performance, OpenX comes from the branding world and is pushing into CTV and other areas of the industry more catered to traditional media agencies …
Chose OpenX
We have used Basis as a DSP but found better results in integrating OpenX with our own bidder. As for Smaato, they are focused only on in-app traffic so they are a niche player. OpenX is a bigger player for agencies that have different campaigns with multiple objectives and …
Chose OpenX
OpenX provides the same inventory you can get on any other SSPs but at lower price points (generally). However, other exchanges have put more resources on curating their inventory and customer support and in OpenX, you may find some nasty surprises in terms of ad quality and …
Chose OpenX
I use OpenX along with Sailthru because the two combined give me the full amount of reporting statistics I need to give to clients. I would say they are equal but different, and both are necessary but it would be great if all of these statistics could be contained within one …
Chose OpenX
We selected OpenX because most of the team had previous experience; it was free and we were able to self-host it.
Chose OpenX
While DART is my perferred ad server, openx is a more cost efficient product and would be my next choice.
Chose OpenX
OpenX probably falls in the middle. I've used MediaPlex, APN & Sitescout. OpenX is probably the second easiest to use.
Chose OpenX
I do not use OpenX as much as I do other tools that are out there in the market these days. It is a solid system which is definitely better than some that are out there, but it needs to become a bit more competitive in my opinion to keep up with the other leaders that are out …
Chose OpenX
Double Click, Adbrite before it became sitescout. We chose Open X because it was easy to integrate into the back end of our site and we liked the reports it provided and the ease of use. Double Click is a Google company, and frankly, while they are good at some technology, …
Chose OpenX
We've used Double Click and both products perform equally well.
Chose OpenX
If OpenX wants to be used or adopted by more desks or RTB partners than it needs to provide the transparency and premium inventory that a AppNexus, ADX and Rubicon provide. This goes for the open exchange and private marketplaces.
Chose OpenX
The ad sales and ad operations team had been utilizing DoubleClick/DART previous to the migration to OpenX. One of the driving factors for the migration to OpenX was to lower costs associated with utilizing a third party such as the DoubleClick/DART system. The ease of use for …
Chose OpenX
I was not responsible for the selection decision, that was done before I joined the company. However, it was the low cost and adaptability that custom integration allowed that made it really the only solution that we knew of.
Features
Adform FLOWOpenX
Ad Network Integration
Comparison of Ad Network Integration features of Product A and Product B
Adform FLOW
8.4
Ratings
13% above category average
OpenX
6.6
Ratings
11% below category average
Data Transfer8.80 Ratings6.50 Ratings
DSP integration8.00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Ad Campaigns
Comparison of Ad Campaigns features of Product A and Product B
Adform FLOW
8.0
Ratings
2% above category average
OpenX
7.0
Ratings
11% below category average
Ad campaign creation7.50 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Ad deployment7.70 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Display advertising9.00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Ad display and retargeting segmentation8.00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Sequence targeting8.00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Ad Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Ad Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Adform FLOW
8.0
Ratings
3% above category average
OpenX
6.6
Ratings
16% below category average
Ad dashboards9.00 Ratings5.90 Ratings
Ad performance reports8.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Ad conversion tracking7.50 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Ad attribution reporting7.50 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Cross-channel ad management8.70 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Ad forecasting and optimization7.50 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Adform FLOWOpenX
Small Businesses
Criteo Commerce Growth
Criteo Commerce Growth
Score 8.0 out of 10
Criteo Commerce Growth
Criteo Commerce Growth
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
The Trade Desk
The Trade Desk
Score 9.0 out of 10
The Trade Desk
The Trade Desk
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Criteo Commerce Growth
Criteo Commerce Growth
Score 8.0 out of 10
Criteo Commerce Growth
Criteo Commerce Growth
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Adform FLOWOpenX
Likelihood to Recommend
7.7
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Adform FLOWOpenX
Likelihood to Recommend
It is well suited for organisations which have big customer base and huge databases. It integrates well with the existing database and the reporting is amazing. The whole team reports can be generated using admin dashboard. Plus the campaign reports are also generated accurately giving all related details. It might not be suitable for small scale companies as that won't be cost efficient.
Read full review
This is a wonderful product that is well supported and fully backed by OpenX. If you have green staff that require some training to get their foot in the door for basic ad management, this is a great tool. We've never utilized the OpenX ad market so I can't speak to the quality of the ads in that open market, but for in-house ads in complex networks with its targeting tools, this software would be more than suitable to fulfill your needs.
Read full review
Pros
  • targeting options
  • ease of use
  • nice reporting options
  • Adform flow User ID - postcookie targeting option in particular.
Read full review
  • When it comes to RTB and spending on the open exchange market, the number one reason why we spend in one exchange over another is simple performance
  • When Open X doesn't perform which it tends not to, we have to shut that exchange off. This exchange tends to not perform at a CPA or CPC KPI and tends to not have the safest sites either.
  • Because I only use Open X as an exchange which I tap into from a DSP I can't speak to it's other capabilities.
Read full review
Cons
  • Customer service
  • Integration & deployment with existing infrastructure
  • Upgrades to the platform
Read full review
  • Propagation could be improved; ad units that need to go live immediately could take up to 45 minutes to propagate.
  • Over-complexity can be confusing. There are multiple tiers before assigning ad units per order and it seems unnecessary.
  • Real-time reporting or a status dashboard would be great.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
I would renew use of OpenX as it is a solid ad serving platform that is easy to use, install, and maintain with some great advanced features that give more control to publishers ad ops teams large or small while reducing the costs associated with managing, serving, and delivering ads from third party vendors.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
I was given the system to use as part of setting up a whole new site from scratch in less than 2 months, with a large number of specialty hub pages to run ads on and lots of content I needed to run disease specific ads on. The system was easy for me to learn on the fly in a very compressed time frame. I would have loved more chance to really dig in under the hood to see all that it could do, but given how fast I had to work, I got everything up and running and looking great. And I did it ahead of my launch deadline too. My only reservation might be for people who are not as patient as I am in picking things up, or as hands on. Customer service was great if I needed them, and a quick start guide with the essentials would be ideal for those people.
Read full review
Support Rating
Reasons are already given in past. They are really slow in support service.
Read full review
They went above and beyond without ever asking for additional money and we met our launch date and immediately started to meet and even surpass our business goals. Nothing was too much trouble, which really stood out compared to other companies I had and was at that time also working with. Customer service can really make or break any business; if i expect my staff to give good customer service, I expect to get it too, and Open X gave it.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Adform was in some usecases similar to Xaxis, however, client preferred to use Adform.
Read full review
Double Click, Adbrite before it became sitescout. We chose Open X because it was easy to integrate into the back end of our site and we liked the reports it provided and the ease of use. Double Click is a Google company, and frankly, while they are good at some technology, their products can be clunky failures AND we are not so sure we want to give them so much data about the inner workings of our business and keyword universe
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • CPA reduction 20% in some clients
  • ROAS driven decisions
  • DSP Cost reduction
Read full review
  • OpenX made it easy to manage online advertising. At the time I used the product I was the lead developer in charge of implementing the solution but quickly was put into the role of managing the traffic and training other users. It was really easy for a technical user to become a traffic manager. Getting other users trained and up to speed was very efficient.
Read full review
ScreenShots