Azure Container Instances vs. Akamai Cloud Computing
Azure Container Instances vs. Akamai Cloud Computing
Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
---|---|---|---|---|
Azure Container Instances | N/A | Microsoft's Azure Container Instances allows developers to focus on building apps without managing virtual machines or having to learn new tools—it's just the application, in a container, running in the cloud. | $0.01 Per GB Per Hour | |
Akamai Cloud Computing | N/A | Akamai Cloud Computing (formerly Linode) accelerates innovation with scalable and accessible Linux cloud solutions and services. These products, services, and people give developers and enterprises the flexibility and support to build, deploy, secure, and scale applications more easily from cloud to edge on Akamai's distributed network. | $0 Monthly or Hourly |
Azure Container Instances | Akamai Cloud Computing | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
Additional Details | — | CPU, transfer, storage, and RAM are bundled into one price. Storage capacity can be increased with additional Block Storage or S3-compatible Object Storage. Instant Backups can be added with complete independence to the stack. Linode NodeBalancers ensure applications are available. | ||||||||||||||
More Pricing Information |
Azure Container Instances | Akamai Cloud Computing | |
---|---|---|
Top Pros |
| |
Top Cons |
|
|
Azure Container Instances | Akamai Cloud Computing | |
---|---|---|
Small Businesses | IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service Score 9.3 out of 10 | Amazon S3 Score 8.9 out of 10 |
Medium-sized Companies | IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service Score 9.3 out of 10 | SAP on IBM Cloud Score 9.1 out of 10 |
Enterprises | IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service Score 9.3 out of 10 | SAP on IBM Cloud Score 9.1 out of 10 |
All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
Azure Container Instances | Akamai Cloud Computing | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | - (0 ratings) | 9.7 (214 ratings) |
Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 9.0 (28 ratings) |
Usability | - (0 ratings) | 8.9 (20 ratings) |
Availability | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (3 ratings) |
Performance | - (0 ratings) | 8.2 (3 ratings) |
Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 8.6 (213 ratings) |
Online Training | - (0 ratings) | 8.2 (1 ratings) |
Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (11 ratings) |
Configurability | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (2 ratings) |
Ease of integration | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (1 ratings) |
Product Scalability | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (3 ratings) |
Vendor post-sale | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (2 ratings) |
Vendor pre-sale | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (2 ratings) |
Azure Container Instances | Akamai Cloud Computing | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | Microsoft No answers on this topic | Linode |
Pros | Microsoft No answers on this topic | Linode |
Cons | Microsoft No answers on this topic | Linode |
Likelihood to Renew | Microsoft No answers on this topic | Linode |
Usability | Microsoft No answers on this topic | Linode |
Reliability and Availability | Microsoft No answers on this topic | Linode |
Performance | Microsoft No answers on this topic | Linode |
Support Rating | Microsoft No answers on this topic | Linode |
Online Training | Microsoft No answers on this topic | Linode |
Implementation Rating | Microsoft No answers on this topic | Linode |
Alternatives Considered | Microsoft No answers on this topic | Linode |
Scalability | Microsoft No answers on this topic | Linode |
Return on Investment | Microsoft No answers on this topic | Linode |
ScreenShots | Akamai Cloud Computing Screenshots |