Kareo Medical Billing vs. WebPT

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Kareo Medical Billing
Score 5.1 out of 10
N/A
Kareo Medical Billing provides billing solutions to medical offices. It includes: Billing Best Practices, Specialty Expertise and Ongoing Training & Support.N/A
WebPT
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
Established in 2008, WebPT is an outpatient rehab therapy software platform helping more than 150,000 rehab therapy professionals from all practice sizes and specialties run their practices to improve care delivery and optimize business performance. And because WebPT is a cloud-based application, PTs, OTs, and SLPs can access the platform (and its data) from anywhere, at any time, promoting collaboration across patient care teams and with third-party payers. In addition to its…
$99
per month per user
Pricing
Kareo Medical BillingWebPT
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Kareo Medical BillingWebPT
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional DetailsWebPT Enterprise packages are custom-made based on clinic needs, and prices vary accordingly.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Kareo Medical BillingWebPT
Considered Both Products
Kareo Medical Billing
Chose Kareo Medical Billing
We used BrickMed for 6 years before switching to Kareo and WebPT. BrickMed was great as a billing tool but did not work well as an EHR for our Clinic.
Chose Kareo Medical Billing
Kareo is the only billing software we have used. We are currently looking at WebPT's Therabill.
Chose Kareo Medical Billing
We are much happier with Kareo than Compulink. The software as a service makes it easy to manage claims from multiple locations when I cannot be on site. The reports and all other aspects I have mentioned as distinct to Kareo. We had a very hard time tracking things with …
Chose Kareo Medical Billing
I used trusted reviews and conversations with others to determine my initial interest in Kareo. I was so happy with the initial trial period that I had no need to look further.
WebPT
Chose WebPT
Since I have worked for my company we have used WebPT. However, we did use Kareo Medical Billing and although it is a fine application- it is nice to have the EMR and Billing combined.
Chose WebPT
As of right now there aren't other programs I have used. Right now WebPT is at the top of the market and offers alot of what we need in terms of scheduling, users, billing and currently satisfied with the results.
Chose WebPT
I was so pleased with WebPT from the minute I started using it that I never investigated any of their competitors!
Chose WebPT
We used this other software before WebPT and had a lot of trouble. WebPT is head and shoulders above in all the elements they cover.
Chose WebPT
Just being able to use their platforms and track our success based on it. The analytics aspect really helps our therapists understand tracking and productivity
Chose WebPT
I reviewed multiple options prior to selecting WebPT for my EHR. Since beginning use, I have not looked at, nor needed to consider any other options. I am satisfied with WebPT.
Chose WebPT
WebPT was just more organized and a lot more user-friendly. They made the transition from paper to EMR very easy. We have had WebPT since 2012.
Chose WebPT
Clinicient has more customization options, but had significant slowdown with multiple clinicians working at the same time.
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Kareo Medical BillingWebPT
Small Businesses
Intergy EHR
Intergy EHR
Score 7.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Qualifacts CareLogic EHR
Qualifacts CareLogic EHR
Score 9.9 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Kareo Medical BillingWebPT
Likelihood to Recommend
1.0
(8 ratings)
6.8
(122 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.7
(14 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(10 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.9
(15 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(6 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
4.5
(1 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
4.5
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Kareo Medical BillingWebPT
Likelihood to Recommend
Tebra Technologies, Inc (Kareo + PatientPop)
In my experience, problems with them adding incorrect fees to pad their bills coupled with their unethical business practices such as locking you out from accessing your EMR at the drop of a hat prevent me from recommending Kareo to any practice. Reliability is paramount. Kareo's use of unethical business practices (locking you out from your EMR or disabling your EMR all together) can result in a physician being sanctioned by the medical board (inappropriate medical record keeping) or financially destroy a small practice leaving them with NO ACCESS to their ERAs/patient billing accounts etc leads me to NOT reccomend their products or doing business with them.
Read full review
WebPT
Well suited: outpatient private clinics where PTs; sports environments. Less well suited: seems like a large hospital setting might have a more difficult time with the operations. Practices with multiple disciplines in it--are PTs and SLPs and OTs all able to document as they need?
Read full review
Pros
Tebra Technologies, Inc (Kareo + PatientPop)
  • Kareo stays up to date on insurance changes which allow for smooth transitions.
  • Kareo asks for feedback and has a place to go and request changes or additions that would make our job easier.
  • I love that you can submit a help ticket or call, if you prefer, with any questions or problems that you may have. They are always very prompt with their follow up.
Read full review
WebPT
  • The scheduler is easy to use and allows for a clear view of each clinical day, week, and month.
  • The authorization/visit limit functions really help in managing each case and assist in minimizing insurance denials.
  • The documentation is comprehensive and specific to physical therapy documentation. The ICD-10 lookup function is very helpful.
  • Transfer of claim information to Therabill really helps with timely claim submission.
Read full review
Cons
Tebra Technologies, Inc (Kareo + PatientPop)
  • I've spent hours on the phone discussing various issues with regards to data variance between two different source documents within the software. At one point, I could not reconcile the A/R balance on one of the dashboards to the A/R balance pulled from the Excel add-in. Unfortunately, their support teams were not able to help out with this.
  • The Excel add-in falls short in a few key areas. Specifically, they do not provide a simple method of joining data fields from the "charges," "payments," and "transactions" tables. One is left to attempt to join the data sets via VLOOKUP or INDEX(MATCH).
  • At times, we have had issues with the API providing information that would not tie out to figures reported elsewhere within the software. Unfortunately, their support teams were not able to help out with this.
Read full review
WebPT
  • I wish the patient reminders didn't cost as much to send, and it would be great to be able to send text messages for any other reason.
  • WebPT adds on extras that always seem to cost more - overall, it is kind of expensive.
  • I always wish the documentation was quicker - but I'm not sure what else that would take.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Tebra Technologies, Inc (Kareo + PatientPop)
No answers on this topic
WebPT
The ease of use and the modern feeling of the software is what keeps us coming back. Being able to have a new employee trained on the software in less than a week is a money saver. The many other softwares that the team at WebPT offer that intergrate with WebPT is numerous and streamlined.
Read full review
Usability
Tebra Technologies, Inc (Kareo + PatientPop)
No answers on this topic
WebPT
It is very easy train people on and make each not the way you would like it. My first time using it I only needed one time walking through it. The software is self explanatory and easy to find what you need in a note
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Tebra Technologies, Inc (Kareo + PatientPop)
No answers on this topic
WebPT
Entire suite down numerous times in 2022 and 2023. Individual modules down as well. Modules rated as operational but not functioning numerous times, most so with scheduling, online intake, and outcomes.
Read full review
Performance
Tebra Technologies, Inc (Kareo + PatientPop)
No answers on this topic
WebPT
Pages often load slowly. Our iMacs are highly reliable and we are connected to the highest speed Comcast business internet. We also connected each iMac via Cat 9 cable during COVID-19 pandemic to speed telelhealth appointments. Zoom does integrate very well with WebPT for telehealth. Their own modules do not integrate well with each other. For example, patients receive separate emails for patient intake and clinical outcomes. If confuses and frustrates many patients. Similarly, EMR flow sheet does not integrate with HEP creating redundancy.
Read full review
Support Rating
Tebra Technologies, Inc (Kareo + PatientPop)
No answers on this topic
WebPT
Support was pretty much always helpful. My only complaint was not being able to always get someone on the phone immediately during working hours and having to wait to hear back. But once we heard back, problems were solved quickly and sufficiently. Staff was always friendly and knowledgeable
Read full review
Online Training
Tebra Technologies, Inc (Kareo + PatientPop)
No answers on this topic
WebPT
WebPT has its entire separate platform for training, containing many different guides, tutorials, and video references to help you become familiar and competent with the software suites. This includes having various demonstrations that allow you to click and navigate pages in the ways you would actually do it in WebPT. WebPT also gives you a sandbox company in the actual website to tinker with and trial things out. This makes it easy to catch and avoid errors you would have otherwise made with active patient data/schedules.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Tebra Technologies, Inc (Kareo + PatientPop)
No answers on this topic
WebPT
I think it would help to have another education session maybe 6 months after the initial sessions. This would help the user come up with an enhanced experience after they have used the program for a period of time. It is hard to comprehend everything at first, especially for people that need hands on learning
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Tebra Technologies, Inc (Kareo + PatientPop)
We are much happier with Kareo than Compulink. The software as a service makes it easy to manage claims from multiple locations when I cannot be on site. The reports and all other aspects I have mentioned as distinct to Kareo. We had a very hard time tracking things with Compulink.
Read full review
WebPT
Also, I have used PTWired and HEP2GO, but they were not in the database. WebPT automatically generates a patient profile, which is very helpful. WebPT also doesn't require the patient to download an app from the App Store, which is an added step for patients to perform, which will decrease compliance.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Tebra Technologies, Inc (Kareo + PatientPop)
No answers on this topic
WebPT
The current terms and pricing would be fair if they provided adequate performance, reliability, support, and customer service. As they have lapsed in these areas WebPT is overpriced. I would not recommend any PT practice of any size agree to a long term contract with WebPT until they prove they will deliver on their promises.
Read full review
Scalability
Tebra Technologies, Inc (Kareo + PatientPop)
No answers on this topic
WebPT
It grew with us from practice inception to our largest size of 12 employees.
Read full review
Professional Services
Tebra Technologies, Inc (Kareo + PatientPop)
No answers on this topic
WebPT
Extremely poor technical support and customer service.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Tebra Technologies, Inc (Kareo + PatientPop)
  • Kareo had an overall low return on investment.
  • Despite the software being active at our company, we were forced to transition to a different solution within 6-months of implementation.
  • The time spent attempting to reconcile the system to itself was rather wasteful.
Read full review
WebPT
  • The payment on claims when they go through correct is phenomenal and very timely.
  • Our productivity is better as notes get done quicker and able to focus more on patient care.
  • Sometimes the long flowsheet gets hard to see when treating a chronic patient.
Read full review
ScreenShots

WebPT Screenshots

Screenshot of WebPT Outcomes Tracking & MIPSScreenshot of WebPT AnalyticsScreenshot of WebPT ReachScreenshot of WebPT EMRScreenshot of WebPT EMR2Screenshot of WebPT EMR