Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams vs. Teams Manager for Microsoft Teams

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Skype for Business was an online messaging and conferencing tool, now superseded by Microsoft Teams.N/A
Teams Manager for Microsoft Teams
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Teams Manager is presented by the vendor as an easy-to-use tool for structure and governance in Microsoft Teams. Teams Manager helps companies prevent uncontrolled growth in Microsoft Teams, while still enabling users to request new teams. Features include: Request process & approval workflow Customizable metadata for teams (which can be used to trigger governance policies) Templates for new teams, with channels,…
$125
per month
Pricing
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft TeamsTeams Manager for Microsoft Teams
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
XL: more than 4,000 users
€ 0.125
per month per user
Small: 1 - 249 users
€ 125.00
per month
Medium: 250 - 999 users
€ 315.00
per month
Large: 1,000 - 4,000 users
€ 504.17
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft TeamsTeams Manager for Microsoft Teams
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee$2,100 one-time fee
Additional DetailsPlease note: mandatory support starts at € 1,035 and is not included in these prices. For information on Enterprise editions, please visit our website.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft TeamsTeams Manager for Microsoft Teams
Considered Both Products
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
Chose Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
I have also used MS teams, and, while I find it similar, I feel like Skype is more user-friendly with the calling and messaging features that it has. Teams is good for meetings but Skype handles those as well also. Overall, Skype suits my needs. I have heard rumors that …
Teams Manager for Microsoft Teams

No answer on this topic

Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft TeamsTeams Manager for Microsoft Teams
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Comparison of Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software features of Product A and Product B
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
7.3
194 Ratings
9% below category average
Teams Manager for Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
High quality audio7.9190 Ratings00 Ratings
High quality video7.7185 Ratings00 Ratings
Low bandwidth requirements6.5182 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile support7.2146 Ratings00 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Comparison of Screen Sharing features of Product A and Product B
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
8.0
191 Ratings
1% below category average
Teams Manager for Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Desktop sharing8.4191 Ratings00 Ratings
Whiteboards7.6120 Ratings00 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Comparison of Online Meetings / Events features of Product A and Product B
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
7.7
188 Ratings
7% below category average
Teams Manager for Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Calendar integration8.3174 Ratings00 Ratings
Meeting initiation8.3182 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with social media7.083 Ratings00 Ratings
Record meetings / events7.2143 Ratings00 Ratings
Slideshows7.6115 Ratings00 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Comparison of Online Events Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
8.0
173 Ratings
5% below category average
Teams Manager for Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
Live chat8.4171 Ratings00 Ratings
Audience polling7.994 Ratings00 Ratings
Q&A7.694 Ratings00 Ratings
Online Events Security
Comparison of Online Events Security features of Product A and Product B
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft Teams
7.6
156 Ratings
10% below category average
Teams Manager for Microsoft Teams
-
Ratings
User authentication7.9142 Ratings00 Ratings
Participant roles & permissions7.6148 Ratings00 Ratings
Confidential attendee list7.4110 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft TeamsTeams Manager for Microsoft Teams
Small Businesses
PanTerra Streams
PanTerra Streams
Score 9.4 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
PanTerra Streams
PanTerra Streams
Score 9.4 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Webex App
Webex App
Score 8.5 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft TeamsTeams Manager for Microsoft Teams
Likelihood to Recommend
7.6
(196 ratings)
8.2
(8 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(14 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(76 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Skype for Business, now part of Microsoft TeamsTeams Manager for Microsoft Teams
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Skype is useful for collaborations across distances, including work from home, as well as a more convenient way to communicate with a large group of people. Skype is also useful to communicate with specific parties quickly, rather than relying on cellular service in areas where not as available. Skype is less useful if the team does not use computers , tablets, smartphones, etc in daily workflow as it would rarely be used.
Read full review
Solutions2Share
For different projects in a big organization different teams can be formed and thus their internal tasks assignments can be done there. It is easy to manage, assign tasks to people in a particular project. People or team leads in multiple projects can share different channels thus maintaining different projects. Users should be refrained of creating new teams just for fun purpose etc. to avoid to much chaos.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Instant messaging to anyone who we know only by name/email. Even if they're offline, they get the message in missed convos and a notification automatically goes to them via Outlook mail. All conversations are saved and accessible via Outlook.
  • Video and voice calls are a norm in the WFH scenario, and an average employee has around 4-5 calls a day. Skype gives notifications for upcoming meetings, allows easy scheduling via outlook calendar, and its audio/video quality [is] reasonably good compared to the amount of data it consumes.
  • Status availabilities - in the WFH scenario, you could be off for lunch, out of office, busy, sharing screens - and might not want to be disturbed. Skype allows you to do that, and in case you're off, ensures that you know that you have missed messages.
  • Screen sharing - we have to share screens at least once or twice a day with a coworker when working on some issues/features, and Skype easily lets us do that. One of the best things about Skype is that the screen can be shared without being on a video/voice call - which is of immense advantage because oftentimes, you could prefer sharing the screen, while it [is] too noisy to talk.
Read full review
Solutions2Share
  • easy to manage team sites along with members and guest users
  • helps managers to track the usage of apps and work done remotely
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Probably the biggest area is the video element as it has historically struggled in this area.
  • The need to be forced to federate with another organisation by providing yours and enabling the other organisation settings is a bit tedious but once done, allows for simple collaboration between third-parties.
  • Functionality wise, as it's an older product and being superseded by MS Teams, it feels as if it's run its course but was very good for what it does/did at the time.
Read full review
Solutions2Share
  • I feel like the Shifts app could be more advanced to sync with Microsoft Outlook. It would be great to receive notifications in Outlook for Shifts and be able to approve/deny requests and schedule changes there while it's synced with the Outlook calendar.
  • It would be nice if the interface allowed further customization such as assigning colors to the separate channels. Some channels within team sites are rather lengthy and it would be great to group them into color groups.
  • Another nice feature would be the option to log in as one of your teammates so you can properly set up their Team account before they log in for the first time.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
The software is simple to install and configure. It is rather simple to explain for correct use. It is possible to profile users for the different functions offered. It is integrated quite completely with Outlook and with Active Directory security. It performs all communication functions well with one or more interlocutors and the possibility of granting control of your computer is convenient.
Read full review
Solutions2Share
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft
Very easy to use. Even though Microsoft Teams has a lot of features and integrations, as a user I feel completely comfortable on finding what I need, getting information about the app extensions and using them. It's a very comprehensive tool, intuitive design and does not make me feel tired to be using it. I am glad with the current experience.
Read full review
Solutions2Share
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
I have only had to reach out to the Support team at Skype for Business once with an issue, and I was pleasantly surprised and encouraged by the quickness and thoroughness of their response. The wait time was short and my question was dealt with politely and clearly, so I would say the support team has it together.
Read full review
Solutions2Share
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
Skpe for business is utilized company wide in regards to my company. Everyone not only uses it, but uses it often. It is an effective way of communicating. It also integrates very nicely with outlook and all conversation history is pushed to a folder within the outlook system. We also have it so that if someone misses a message, they are sent an email reminder saying that there is a message that went unread.
Read full review
Solutions2Share
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
For the below reason I will always choose this app over its competitors: Better audio and video quality, Little to no disconnections or freezing when on a call/video conference Integrates well with mailbox/ calendar/ one drive, and SharePoint is easy to use
Read full review
Solutions2Share
As I mentioned before, we switched to Teams from Skype because it was more reliable. We did not experience interruptions in service especially for those departments working remote.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • We almost lost our biggest client because of the poor performance early on in our implementation...the online meetings were poor quality for audio and bandwidth refreshing
  • Many of the employees in our company disliked the quality so much, they started to sign up for free Cisco WebEx accounts to use instead
  • The majority of employees in our company lost trust in our CTO because of his decision to switch from Cisco WebEx to Skype for Business
Read full review
Solutions2Share
  • A centralized platform for the Operation Manager to handle and see the progress of different projects
  • This makes it easy to handle everyone at one place thus reducing time in contacting individuals and taking the feedback on progress
  • Knowing of any hurdles or bottlenecks in any project by just clicking on any channel and seeing their discussion. Thus guiding them then and there only.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Teams Manager for Microsoft Teams Screenshots

Screenshot of Create templates for new teams - you can include channels, apps, settings, member permissions, folder structure, individual files and OneNote & Planner with or without pre-defined content.Screenshot of Enable your users to request new teams with an automated approval workflow. Create dynamic user groups (e.g. for different departments) that each have their own team templates.Screenshot of Define lifecycles for teams to archive or delete inactive teams after a specified time period.Screenshot of Provide a better overview with naming conventions for team names, OneNotes and Planners.Screenshot of Create powerful governance policies by combining lifecycles and naming conventions. Teams Manager also supports classifications and sensitivity labels for additional security.