Smartlook vs. Wynter

Smartlook is best for screen recordings. Especially when you are running MVPs. However, its pricing is very high. If your daily visitors are too much then either you will have to lose many of your recordings or you will have to pay too much money.

Incentivized

Wynter is ideal when you are doing "high-pressure" message testing where live traffic with A/B audiences isn't effective. Similarly, it's a great way to gather prospective customer data when you don't have access to a customer base for your questions or the cost of sourcing them yourself would be too high.

Incentivized

• Funnels are both easy to configure yet comprehensive enough to detect complicated customer journeys.
• Real-time recording provides exceptional insights to our design & engineering teams.
• Session recording is surprisingly lightweight and seems to cause no substantial performance degradation for our customers.

Incentivized

• Targeted survey groups of our exact ICP
• Easy to digest survey results
• Various feedback types to drill down on useful data

Incentivized

• I feel nickel and dimed with the events and funnels.
• We came from sessions being 30 mins of inactivity and now it's 5-10 mins. Session count has gone up significantly which we weren't prepared for.
• Recording playback isn't as clean and maneuverable like FullStory.

Incentivized

• In my opinion, doesn't have a deep pool of respondents for all titles, but growing
• I think the website look could be modernized
• In my experience, customizing questions sometimes a little tricky, but works

Incentivized

As my ratings show, I have been absolutely delighted with Smartlook in terms of usability, cost, support, and its benefit to our organization. I have given it such high ratings because I think it has really benefitted our organization and I think it could do the same for other companies too.

Incentivized

Every page, the tool setup pages and dashboards are built very well, the site structure is perfectly designed and intuitive to use. All functions are well documented and the help sections are really everywhere, you don't have to search for answers, as they are just popped up or max. a click away for your service.

Incentivized

Sofia P. is being our point of contact with the issues we faced. I was unsure about how to explain to her what was going on with the recording numbers (the recording has stopped before we were expecting to), but she readily understood and came with a solution for us in the same day. The problem was blocking our developer to test the integration, so it was great to have support so fast that he could continue his work.

Incentivized

Every customer support professional I have interacted with at Wynter is helpful, responsive, and well-informed on the product and where they can help. They go above and beyond!

Incentivized

It has been a year between the time when I last used Hotjar and first started using Smartlook. I would say both tools are more or less equal when it comes to features, the only 2 differences I can think of are - price and customer support. Smartlook is cheaper and has superior customer services. You have the feeling when interacting with them that they genuinely care.

Incentivized

Wynter is the only online platform I've used for this kind of focus group message testing.

• Smartlook is used by different individuals from different organizations to have insights into different parts of products. It is used as the sole developer of our website as well as marketing campaigns.
• Smartlook has an amazing feature which is tracking the activities of return users.
• It gives reliable and efficient services.

Incentivized

• Time and cost savings which are really hard to quantify, yet substantial for making the case and getting budget approved.
• Finding & interviewing people that fit your ICP could take anywhere from 2 weeks to months. With Wynter, I get them in 12-24 hours.