Overall Satisfaction with Fuze
Fuze is being used as a cost-effective video conference solution within my company. Although we on occasion use it to communicate between offices, we primarily deploy it to remote locations with a laptop to connect our clients with their witnesses for examinations.
- Fuze is easy to navigate and use, with an intuitive design that allows for new users to understand how to connect to a meeting and control what is happening.
- Fuze is available on all common platforms, meaning a user can choose to download an app, or simply use it as a plugin to their favorite browser.
- Quality of Audio and Video is very impressive, and the overall bandwidth needed for a meeting is relatively low compared to other solutions in the market.
- Because this program isn't particularly robust, a benefit for the user as it doesn't hog your device's resources, you can sometimes feel it struggle to provide a crystal clear image. It's a trade-off, but one that is fairly visible.
- The name. Sometimes when I mention Fuze to a client they assume its another company that has a similar name. They often go to the wrong site (if they're not following the link in the email) or will call back asking why a payment company is going to connect their meeting.
- There is some ground to cover on recognizability. Sometimes when offering Fuze, a client might ask "What about (other more recognizable solution)?" and list off names before they agree to test the software.
- Zoom
Zoom is probably a more reliable solution for Video Conferencing as the user interface is about as easy to use, but with the added benefit of being able to connect to nearly any type of system from newer Lifesize Icon units, to older Polycom systems, to the ancient SIP systems used in many prison systems. Fuze has some compatibility issues with different models and units. Computer to computer/phone/tablet works just great, but actual VC units might be an issue.