Pleasure to collaboration, sharing, and presenting.
Overall Satisfaction with Miro
To present and prepare collaborative presentations for all levels of management. To create flows and integrate with services and other apps Mind mapping and ideation exercise with teams Adding team and managing projects with collective user involvements Project Management and task assigning retrospectives and team exercises templates for agile ways of working.
Pros
- Getting started with readily available templates.
- Assigning tasks easily with team members and comments with details can be tracked - ease of use for small teams.
- Collaborative working - problem solving brainstorming.
Cons
- Zooming and fixing a view could be made better.
- Undo activity log for going back to a particular step.
- Ease of multiple projects.
- We reduced a lot of time with ppts and flow charts and started using Miro to replace them.
- Wireframing has been convenient.
- Our team exercises are more collaborative.
Miro was part of our business continuity plan, which ensured that the collaboration with teams and its experience was not compromised. With the available templates, it was easy for teams and coordinators to refresh their experience with new frameworks and charts available. The walkthrough always helped beginners easily find their way around the tool.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes
We earlier used Trello, InVision, and Lucidchart. These tools were used for different purposes, which are not replaced by a single solution Miro. With Trello, we were managing tasks and project management, InVision for flow, and steps with designs. We still have not completely replaced its purpose with Miro, but still, Miro is used for our wireframes.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation