Autodesk Build vs. Procore

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Autodesk Build
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Autodesk Build, based on the former PlanGrid, is construction productivity software. It includes tools to collaborate, collect, and manage project information throughout the project’s construction and operations lifespan. It enables document centralization and tracking.
$39
user per month
Procore
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Procore is a project management software designed specifically for the construction industry. Procore is cloud-based and allows unlimited users per instance, so that construction team members and stakeholders can all access project information and documents.
$4,500
annually
Pricing
Autodesk BuildProcore
Editions & Modules
Nailgun
$39
user per month
Dozer
$59
user per month
Crane
$139
user per month
Project Management
4,500
annually
Project Management + Financial Management
6,588
annually
Custom Bundle
Custom Quote
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Autodesk BuildProcore
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPricing shown is for organizations running $3M or less in construction volume each year.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Autodesk BuildProcore
Considered Both Products
Autodesk Build
Chose Autodesk Build
Bluebeam and PlanGrid work great together, not sure one could replace the other. Bluebeam is really great for more detailed markups, better than PlanGrid in that respect. When you zoom out on the markups for PlanGrid, markups get really thick and unreadable.

For me, Procore is …
Chose Autodesk Build
PlanGrid provides the perfect balance of simplicity and accuracy. As I've noted, Procore is more robust but the learning curve is steep, and, for my company, the majority of features would go unused (and thus would be a waste of money). PlanGrid offers a few solid features and …
Chose Autodesk Build
PlanGrid is an easier system to use then Procore; however, Procore offers more of a full management software than PlanGrid does with plan distribution.
Chose Autodesk Build
Compared on pricing, PlanGrid was best. Procore does submittals and pay apps, but GoBridgit was completely unrealistic in price for us to consider them. The overall use of PlanGrid along with current pricing makes it worthwhile for us. If pricing goes up, it would no longer be …
Chose Autodesk Build
PlanGrid is very similar to Procore but offers a slightly more straightforward user interface and seems not to be loaded with extra options that rarely would get used like Procore. PlanGrid is a much smoother software than Submittal Exchange or CMiC due to that same interface. …
Chose Autodesk Build
Plangrid would sit in between these two when it comes to mobile job site collaboration and document management. Procore is more a full-featured product but it is 2X-3X the cost and there is some question whether the extra costs actual turns in to an ROI at the end of the day. …
Chose Autodesk Build
Procore and PlanGrid are the most direct competitors. The pricing structures are very dynamically different between PlanGrid and Procore. Procore tends to succeed better in the "project management" realm, while PlanGrid succeeds far beyond Procore in its ability to deal with …
Chose Autodesk Build
Procore is a web-based service and is very slow. While PlanGrid updates and is not web based it is much quicker. PlanGrid is also much easier to use.
Chose Autodesk Build
BlueBeam is a program that some of our customers use as their management tool. It is a little more cumbersome than Plan Grid. We would certainly prefer using PlanGrid over other products that we have tried. Our field staff prefers to have a consistent platform to share the …
Chose Autodesk Build
They have similar platforms and uses. At this time we use both because General Contractors require we use some of these programs to work on their projects, and we don't have a choice which one we use. It's tough because we then have multiple platforms to learn, manage and use …
Chose Autodesk Build
It's easier to use, more user-friendly, has ready access, and is more cost effective.
Chose Autodesk Build
Bluebeam is easier to use for plan markups, but the punch list function of PlanGrid is far better.
Chose Autodesk Build
Plangrid, while not serving the external document distribution function, is unrivaled for internal document distribution and sharing in the construction industry. The speed at which documents are navigatable, the ability to download your projects for viewing without an internet …
Chose Autodesk Build
I haven't really used anything else extensively, but I have touched Procore a little. Not enough to compare though.
Chose Autodesk Build
Haven't actually used anything else like PlanGrid. I studied Procore but have never gotten a chance to use it in practice.
Procore
Chose Procore
We selected Procore because it offered a complete project management and bidding software program. It didn't offer pieces but a complete picture of each project. The mobile and web option was a big reason for the choice.
Chose Procore
Procore is over priced, and other competitors have come a long way.
Chose Procore
Procore is leaps and bounds better than any other product on the market. While there is room for improvement, the other programs out there are cumbersome to use or do not have all of the functionality that Procore has as of today. I have yet to see anything that stands up to …
Chose Procore
Procore is the most comprehensive of all. Pricing on size rather than the user is another reason that we used in deciding on Procore.
Chose Procore
Procore is very much the industry-standard software, I personally preferred using field wire because it was considerably more user-friendly for field operators to understand. Procore is utilized more readily between different trades, so often we would see Procore to be better …
Chose Procore
We evaluated both PlanGrid and Procore at the same time in the field. We had numerous users in each. We implemented both products. Even paid PlanGrid to train. (Procore implementation is free.) Our teams on PlanGrid abandoned their projects within 2 months and begged to be …
Chose Procore
Since Procore attempts to be an all-in-one solution, it comes with more capability than just about any other system we have seen or used. However, that does not always mean it is better. Using PlanGrid as an example, Procore's plan viewing is inferior to the more professional …
Chose Procore
Procore is significantly better than e-Builder but on par with PlanGrid. In my experience, Procore is hands-down the best product of its kind. The Procore customer and technical support is excellent, they are always available to help with any issues or questions you may have. …
Chose Procore
Procore has no equal in the GC Market.
Chose Procore
Much easier to use. Because I learned Procore first, it set a good foundation of what I should be looking for as I hunt and peck to navigate other program management software.
Chose Procore
Procore is more intuitive and easy to pick up and to navigate.
Chose Procore
I have previously used these other software's at other companies, and Procore is ahead of the game when it comes to these tools. These tools are all useful when it comes to one area of expertise in construction, but Procore is good at covering all of these areas and being a one …
Chose Procore
I can't compare Procore to most other construction software because they tend to focus more on one specific module (e.g. PlanGrid is only on drawing, RFI, and submittal management). I heard there's another company that is trying to build something like Procore that …
Chose Procore
To be honest, PlanGrid was far superior as a Drawing / Punchlist tool back when it came out. Procore did a major revision on their Tools in the last year or two, and now Procore is an excellent tool.
Chose Procore
Procore seemed to be more aimed at ease of use for contractors and the day to day on site staff.
Chose Procore
I've used PlanGrid for punchout related items for exteriors of builds and it works well. Procore has adopted very similar features which has made that software mostly obsolete since we really only use Procore on my project site.
Chose Procore
We selected Procore because it manages to have the benefits of many programs on a single platform on both PC and mobile devices regardless of the number of users. It is also safe and reliable for informational use in the design and construction industry.
Chose Procore
We are still using this program as well. Between the two, PlanGrid works better for people without a constant internet connection. However, Procore works extremely well with the mobile app, submittals, and drawing updates.
Chose Procore
We have tried PlanGrid and one other program that I can’t remember. There are not any other products that we have elevated or used further to my knowledge.
Chose Procore
PlanGrid was a drawings solution that tried to become more of a project management solution. The drawings markups on PlanGrid were good, but the project management tools were lackluster.

Procore has more tools and they function much better than PlanGrid (except for the …
Chose Procore
The programs are very similar, but Procore can be customized to suit our needs. The future integration between Procore and Hedberg will be a real help to us.
Chose Procore
PlanGrid is limited due to its "per seat" cost and the inability to share drawings with someone without an account.
Procore has none of these issues.
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Autodesk BuildProcore
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk Build
7.9
57 Ratings
6% above category average
Procore
8.7
720 Ratings
16% above category average
Plan distribution & viewing8.656 Ratings9.1691 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing8.656 Ratings8.9666 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists7.551 Ratings8.8646 Ratings
Photo documentation7.048 Ratings9.1694 Ratings
Jobsite reports6.736 Ratings9.1657 Ratings
Document sharing7.655 Ratings8.5710 Ratings
RFI tools8.338 Ratings9.0675 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals7.142 Ratings8.4654 Ratings
As-built drawings8.442 Ratings8.3119 Ratings
Mobile app9.454 Ratings8.6670 Ratings
Submittal design and management00 Ratings8.8177 Ratings
Meeting Minutes00 Ratings8.4168 Ratings
Specifications00 Ratings8.6175 Ratings
Change orders00 Ratings8.5143 Ratings
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk Build
-
Ratings
Procore
8.6
45 Ratings
11% above category average
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)00 Ratings8.645 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk Build
-
Ratings
Procore
7.1
46 Ratings
6% below category average
Support for external payroll vendors00 Ratings7.146 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk Build
-
Ratings
Procore
7.5
165 Ratings
7% below category average
Dashboards00 Ratings7.3155 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings7.5160 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings7.9156 Ratings
Data exportability00 Ratings7.4150 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk Build
-
Ratings
Procore
8.2
92 Ratings
0% above category average
Takeoff tools00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Job costing00 Ratings6.880 Ratings
Cost databases00 Ratings8.14 Ratings
Cost calculator00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Bid creation00 Ratings7.286 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Autodesk BuildProcore
Small Businesses
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 9.5 out of 10
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Revit
Revit
Score 8.9 out of 10
Revit
Revit
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Score 8.7 out of 10
Revit
Revit
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Autodesk BuildProcore
Likelihood to Recommend
2.4
(69 ratings)
8.5
(826 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(66 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(1 ratings)
9.0
(54 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(15 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.5
(15 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(52 ratings)
7.3
(65 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(5 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(13 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.8
(113 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(15 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(310 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.8
(15 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(13 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.7
(14 ratings)
User Testimonials
Autodesk BuildProcore
Likelihood to Recommend
Autodesk
PlanGrid performs really well in all aspects of construction from the general to the sub/trade. The platform distributes and communicates project documentation in an extremely user-friendly manner. As with most software, it is cheaper the larger the scale of the project. In situations where the project is relatively small, and the trade contracts are also of relatively low dollar value, the product can be cost-prohibitive.
Read full review
Procore Technologies
Procore is well suited when there is an office staff to manage the application, if a company existed without an office staff then the field crews would have to maintain Procore. This could cause more problems than is solves. Otherwise having the ability to pick & choose different modules to suit our use cases is ideal
Read full review
Pros
Autodesk
  • Plangrid is the best SaaS I have seen for ease of uploading construction plans and automated organization of those plans.
  • For companies that are not using other products for mobile access, the Plangrid mobile apps are perfect to allow people on and off site to share and collaborate in many phases of construction project documentation.
  • Plangrid has a very responsive technical support team (although it is pretty much email only).
  • Plangrid's website layout is easy to use and understand and allows new users to jump right in and do basic to moderate tasks without little training.
Read full review
Procore Technologies
  • Submittals, Easily able to track and keep a running record of documentation.
  • RFI's ability to track costs and impacts to the project in one useful tool.
  • Keeping all items for a job in one location. I love that Procore is my one-stop shopping for all items related to my project.
Read full review
Cons
Autodesk
  • The photo attachment process is a bit complicated. In ProCore (another similar software I've used), you can upload photos directly into RFIs for your reference, or into e-mails. For PlanGrid, you have to first upload the photo into the documents tab, then link them into the RFI. It's not intuitive and can add confusion to the documents tab.
  • Photos can't be directly uploaded. Between different devices and colleagues, it's possible you'll get an important photo outside of the PlanGrid photo capture feature within its app. Again, it's complicated for users to use.
  • In their new drawings viewer, the icons for actions do not have icons available. I had to use them all in order to understand what they meant, and I'm fairly tech savvy. I'm not sure if a new person to PlanGrid will pick up on each icon's abilities very easily.
  • There's no all-in-one solution in CM, but PlanGrid is fairly barebones, and I don't believe it has any ability to connect to other software. There's no ability to take meeting munites; you can hack the field reports feature to accomplish this, but it's clear that was not the intent of the designers.
Read full review
Procore Technologies
  • Downloading drawing sets sometimes involves an extra step that holds up the process
  • The dashboard is simplistic to the point that I don't feel like I am getting enough information about a specific project from the get-go
  • Granting access to a project on Procore is not very straightforward as a consultant- restrictions sometimes cause hold-ups
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Autodesk
We are at the point where we have shown our teams what is possible with this software. We cannot take it away and go back to the way we used to do things. I think that they would push back on us to give them access to something electronic. It is a good program that we will continue to use
Read full review
Procore Technologies
We will undoubtedly renew Procore as it has proven itself to be a means to better track and improve upon our efficiency and communications between job sites and their project managers as well as all other departments. Procore has made an incredible impact on how we, as a company, do our job on all levels; it is one of our most powerful and effective resources.
Read full review
Usability
Autodesk
Very well thought app, easy to use and provides fast access to the project's plans (your own and your team's), improvements in the annotation posibilities and on-site report generator will be appreciatted. The punch-list report generator and the current/previous plan version compare tools works flawlessly. Haven't used the RFI's nor field report options yet
Read full review
Procore Technologies
90% of Procore is very intuitive and any user can pick it up and go. There are a few elements, more so on the Financials side that need some prior knowledge of systems in order to understand how and why it functions as it does. Once this is understood, it flows effortlessly
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Procore Technologies
If you are working in an area with little to no signal, Procore will still allow you to get in the system and use it fully and will then update once you are at a place with a strong enough signal. Whether it be with wifi or LTE cell phone reception.
Read full review
Performance
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Procore Technologies
For the most part Procore is very responsive. However there are times when it's a little slow but it's minimal.
Read full review
Support Rating
Autodesk
Online chat during business hours is extremely helpful. The Plangrid staff has gone above and beyond many times to help us. One time they even offered to completely rebuild our 900+ sheet project so I could slip sheet a few old drawing revisions! This undoubtedly would have taken hours on Plangrid's end. They are always responsive and are continually improving, listening to user feedback.
Read full review
Procore Technologies
General Support for Project Management and Financials is consistent. The ERP support is never consistent and I do end up at times in a black hole. I have to continually reach out to get the issue resolved or get an update. The ERP support needs more of Procore's attention
Read full review
In-Person Training
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Procore Technologies
Procore's Implementation Team does a great job of ensuring users are confident in using the system. They run through a process of training sessions based on the tools you have purchased, and lay ou ta plan to help the power users configure the tool to suit the company's needs. They provide useful resources for certifications, support and ongoing training as well.
Read full review
Online Training
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Procore Technologies
Procore's certification program and focused how-to training videos allowed for easy training that did not feel overwhelming. The way the certification programs were broken up into small parts made it seem much less daunting to complete. The training feels focused and does not overload users with too much information all at once.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Procore Technologies
Iron out your cost code list in your accounting software before you link with Procore. Once the link is established that list is more or less permanent. Review the permission matrix carefully. It controls so much. You want to ensure the information provided to your users adequate but you also want to protect your sensitive data. Procore Financials are organized in a total contract value style. Any markup or Profit will need to be sent somewhere on your budget. This may be significantly different than the Cost budgeting that many contractors do
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Autodesk
Plangrid, while not serving the external document distribution function, is unrivaled for internal document distribution and sharing in the construction industry. The speed at which documents are navigatable, the ability to download your projects for viewing without an internet connection, and the document mark-up and photo tools place it head and shoulders above the competition.
Read full review
Procore Technologies
Procore has a clearer user interface and a wider variety of tools than any program I've used. Procore also lives up to their name in terms of helpful and fast customer service. There is always a Procore rep. that is available to contact, making any problems just a mini hurdle.
Read full review
Scalability
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Procore Technologies
once in awhile Procore is down for a period of time, its frustrating when it happens but doesn't tend to last long.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Autodesk
  • It helped us "wow" a joint commission survey in 2016 and have a successful survey because he loved how we could access plans on an iPad, check suite sizes, and didn't have to carry around huge, heavy sets of life safety plans.
Read full review
Procore Technologies
  • The Procore service impacts on construction projects are effective and reliable on production acceleration.
  • The collaboration is stable and easy files access and uploading of engineering drawings and plans is excellent.
  • New project planning and project financial data management on Procore functions are excellent.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Autodesk Build Screenshots

Screenshot of No confusing folders - all your plans at your fingertips.Screenshot of Easy overlay to visually detect changes or clashes.Screenshot of Track issues directly on the plan, including descriptions, photos, cost, and schedule impacts.Screenshot of Mark up plans for instant communication between field and office.Screenshot of Attach any kind of construction documents to your plans, including 360 photos.Screenshot of Track, review, and submit all your field reports on a mobile device.