Great scalability
Updated October 08, 2022

Great scalability

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Modules Used

  • MX64
  • MX64W
  • MX67
  • MX67W
  • MX67C
  • MX68
  • MX68W
  • MX68CW
  • MX84
  • MX100
  • MX250
  • MX450

Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Meraki MX

Cisco Meraki MX has been deployed at 900 shops and 14 warehouses. It resolved infrastructure standardization and scalability, and it contained security issues. Templates have been used extensively, so we completed the migration in under 2 months. Cisco Meraki MX was great, however not that happy with the MS line and their compatibility with the datacenter stuff.
  • Template based configuration
  • Ease of configuration
  • Hardware replacement
  • Configuration overrides
  • Monitoring of backup circuits
  • Features

Do you think Cisco Meraki MX delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Cisco Meraki MX's feature set?

Yes

Did Cisco Meraki MX live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Cisco Meraki MX go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Cisco Meraki MX again?

Yes

  • ROI
  • Manageability
As it says, easy to manage.
It did scale to 900 sites.
SolarWinds ipMonitor, SolarWinds Log Analyzer (LA)
Cisco Meraki MX is best suited for SD-WAN with Internet underlay. Cisco Meraki MX would not work well with MPLS circuits.

Cisco Meraki MX Feature Ratings

Identification Technologies
6
Visualization Tools
7
Content Inspection
6
Policy-based Controls
5
Active Directory and LDAP
5
Firewall Management Console
8
Reporting and Logging
5
VPN
10
High Availability
10
Stateful Inspection
8
Proxy Server
7

Cisco Hybrid Work

  • Webex Meetings
  • Cisco Meraki MX
  • Cisco Meraki MR
  • Cisco Meraki vMX
  • Cisco AnyConnect
  • Cisco Umbrella
  • Cisco Secure Access by Duo
  • Working from an office or other company space
  • Working from home
We have completed the implementation. The biggest challenge was with endpoint inventory, endpoint security, physical network standardisation and generating the fewest possible network templates. Other big challenge was two-factor authentication for remote access, and creating a separate set of numbered usernames for admin access.
People adapted quite easily to remote work, out of necessity, but having people back to the office, at least for a couple of days per week seems to be the real challenge. This is important for training and integrating the junior staff, and also for integrating the different parts of the organization that now are used to work independently.
The Cisco's hybrid work solutions solved the remote work challenges, but it's not the technology that can fix the people's desire to go back to the office.
People spend the same amount of time doing their work in a hybrid model, and do their work well. However, the border between home and work has melted, and it's hard to get the same quality of human interaction as it used to be before. This is especially important when providing context and training to junior staff. Senior staff is probably doing better with hybrid work or fully remote work.
Cisco's products integrate well, and that's the main reason for using them. There were, however, some blind spots, for example a cloud proxy, and the automation for deploying secure endpoints (workstations). We will also consider replacing Webex with Teams, for the same reason of better integration.