Overall Satisfaction with Scale Computing HC3
We are using Scale across our entire corporation which includes retail, wholesale and manufacturing entities. We run a mixture of Debian Linux and Windows Server 2012r2 with 27 VMs total. We have appreciated the performance improvements and flexibility of a single large storage pool after migrating from a solution where we had several standalone servers hosting VMs.
- HC3 makes it dead easy to clone a VM from a snapshot and get it up and running using their simple web interface.
- The HC3 dashboard allows one to see at a glance the major indicators of server utilization across the cluster.
- Spinning up a new VM based on a template makes the job of adding a new server easy and quick.
- HC3 does not offer guaranteed support for Debian Linux, however we have not run into any significant issues despite using it heavily in production.
One of the business-critical applications we run our our Scale Cluster is Epicor ERP. When transferring our Epicor server from a physical box to a Scale VM we saw marked improvement despite allocating a lot less RAM. This was due to the improved IO of the cluster.
- Purchasing a Scale Cluster, instead of one off server from Dell, has allowed us to rapidly expand our server base without managing or maintaining a mixture of hardware models. This took a substantial up-front investment but over the life-cycle of the cluster is expected to result in reduced cost.
We evaluated offerings from HP/SimpliVity, Dell-EMC/VxRail Appliances and Nutanix. We choose Scale based on them being the best value for our needs. One of the way's Scale does this is by not requiring a separate hypervisor with additional licensing. Also they are less unreasonable with their hardware margins.