Notified Webcast Platform- Studio vs. RingCentral Video

1) Do I need something customized? 2) How hands-on do I want to be?

I would recommend RingCentral Video if a user or company is currently using RingCentral Meetings and is concerned with the security implications of using a Zoom-based platform. I would also recommend it if they are using O365 or G Suite presently. I would not recommend RingCentral Video if they are using MS Exchange on-prem. RingCentral Video is not as good as RingCentral Meetings, at present. It's also not as good as other meeting software, such as Cisco Webex.

• Offer high quality webcasting products and services
• Has a helpful, friendly team
• Tailor the products to your individual needs

• Audio quality is always good if we have good internet.
• Sharing the screen is easy and simple for every user.
• Reliability, as all the conference software we need to make sure it's there whenever we need it.

Incentivized

• Sometimes, RingCentral Video does not allow users to join a call without the desktop/mobile app.
• Call recording data is limited to past six months only.
• The new desktop has some glitches.

Incentivized

Ring Central is very easy to navigate and schedule meetings with this. I have tried other video platforms for meetings but they aren't as easy to navigate.

Incentivized

Did not require support

Incentivized

RingCentral Video works basically as well as Google, Skype, and Zoom, however, those apps are more well known and much more industry standards. That is why we prefer them however we do use RingCentral as the backup and for some clients who prefer it for one reason or another. It is firmly on the second tier of options, but it is solid nonetheless.

Incentivized

• Increased employee efficiency
• Quicker production time

• It gets the job done and we have probably saved a nominal amount bc we use other features as well compared to competitors

Incentivized