Review of Meraki MX After Several Years of Use
June 08, 2023

Review of Meraki MX After Several Years of Use

Anthony Decker | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Modules Used

  • MX64
  • MX64W
  • MX68W
  • MX68CW
  • MX84
  • MX100
  • VMX-M

Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Meraki MX

We use MX Security Appliances for our primary staff traffic at headquarters along with full network manipulation of our regional locations. The MX appliances are fantastic for setting up site-site VPN and managing the entire network. For our regional locations, we utilize the whole scope of the Meraki MX series security appliances. The MX handles our DHCP requests and passes them to the clients using bridge mode on the MV access points. For each of our locations, they directly attach to each other using a hub and spoke design. These security appliances make it fairly easy to manage multiple locations and I highly recommend.
  • Site-Site VPN
  • Cloud Management
  • DHCP Scopes
  • Error Reporting
  • AP Band Selection
  • Firewall Logs

Do you think Cisco Meraki MX delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Cisco Meraki MX's feature set?

Yes

Did Cisco Meraki MX live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of Cisco Meraki MX go as expected?

I wasn't involved with the implementation phase

Would you buy Cisco Meraki MX again?

Yes

  • Replaces Aging ASAs
  • Reduced Hands-on Site-site creation as it's automatic with devices in your account
  • Some units have built in SIM slots and allow for failover onto a wireless network without having to purchase additional hardware.
The dashboard has improved the way we set up regionals for the positive. We are able to remotely change configuration on any backend changes needed applied. For example, to securely segregate our corporate network from an open network, we are able to make VLAN changes and firewall changes from afar without concern for breaking the network.
The MR are the Meraki Access Points. We use them for the wireless at the regionals and are able to make any changes required from afar.
The MV are the Meraki Cameras. We use these to monitor our secure closets and make sure that unauthorized users are not dumping unwanted items into the closets and/or playing with our gear.
The vMX is our "main" MX appliance and lives in AWS.
We also use Meraki MT sensors for closet management. Both the door sensors and Temp/Humid sensors are fantastic.
Every network we create will allow us to automatically be attached in the mesh network. The ability for the automatic VPN connections is very convenient and allow us to focus on other configuration points without having to worry about if the VPN will work or not. The GUI showing the VPN is kind of confusing, but as long as it has direct connection to the other Meraki MX units, it will be up.
Meraki is more entailed towards larger businesses and allow much quicker support remediation. Meraki does have a yearly license, whereas UniFi does not. UniFi is really nice and I would use it in smaller single SOHO applications, but wouldn't use it for larger organizations like mine.
Meraki is well suited for businesses that have more than one location. This is because the site-site connection is seamless and makes connections on the corporation network quick and redundant. When you have more than 3 networks, they all connect to each other and can create more tunnels in case one goes offline.

Cisco Meraki MX Feature Ratings

Identification Technologies
8
Visualization Tools
8
Content Inspection
7
Policy-based Controls
8
Active Directory and LDAP
Not Rated
Firewall Management Console
6
Reporting and Logging
6
VPN
10
High Availability
8
Stateful Inspection
10
Proxy Server
Not Rated