Overall Satisfaction with Miro
Miro is being used in architecture education to support a hybrid learning format. It is used virtually every course and in all peer reviews as a collaborative tool and "pin-up" space. It addresses a need for live annotations across multiple devices (professor to student, peer to peer) while being able to host a variety of media formats.
- Drawing & annotations
- Media Hosting
- Collaborative Design
- Organization of separate Miro "boards"
- Handling of a large volume of content on a single board (reviews for 100+ students)
- Annotation tools and drawing capabilities
- Increased collaboration and visibility of work
- Improved productivity through live annotation
- Made a hybrid educational environment feasible
Miro has allowed a new kind of hybrid collaboration where interactions between professors and students, along with peer-to-peer reviews, are easier to execute in real-time and easier to review at a later time. It is a good complement to something like Zoom, Teams in a remote setting.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes