Overall Satisfaction with Miro
We use it to map out our sprint or quarterly plans, for brainstorming sessions before structuring any solution. - We use it for retrospective sessions and vote for any next best action we plan to take. - We also used it to create our north star metric tree and frequently modify its sub metrics by linking various dashboards that are related to the metrics.
- KPI Decision Tree.
- Retrospective Sessions.
- Voting various decisions/Ideas team have.
- Planning out next sprints.
- There can be gif/img support on stickies (maybe there is but idk).
- By clicking one colored sticky, other stickies with the same color can be highlighted.
- Increased our DEVS working efficiency around 15 to 20 Percent.
- Provides considerable time efficiency around all kinds of planning phases but we don't calculate it.
As I stated before it helps us to connect remotely to plan out our next sprints and even the whole quarterly plan by sorting out the demands of our stakeholders and rating their prior scores. Then everyone in the team can see what is the short-mid-long term roadmap and plan their work distribution.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes
We use Figma for designing the UX flows but these two products are pretty different from my perspective. They both have asked questions on stickies feature and creating a structure around ideas/actions by putting stickers features but Miro is more practical and easy to use. Figma is serving more like detailed flows specially for detailed required tasks.