Using Miro for Architecture.
February 23, 2022
Using Miro for Architecture.
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Miro
As a student, Miro was able to create a platform where the "pin-up" commonly used in architectural and art critique was almost exactly replicated digitally, collaboratively, and with more flexibility than a traditional pin-up would allow. Miro also allowed for presentations to be created entirely within, rather than resorting to the use of Powerpoint, Keynote, etc.
- Handles web traffic and lots of users at once well.
- Drag and drop for files works great.
- Great for quick mood boards.
- Desktop app is somehow not as good as simply using the browser.
- Text manipulation could be more rich.
- Further customizability of existing templates.
- Overall learning curve at the beginning, familiarizing with capabilities and shortcomings.
It has allowed for collaboration where there would not be - as Miro took place of physical pin-ups and reviews. It, however, cannot replicate the studio time spent in a school with professors and students in a working environment.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes
- MURAL (formerly Mural.ly)
Miro is more seamless, faster, and overall more pleasant to use. much nicer interface. I have used both concurrently and for about the same time and can say I much prefer Miro - the iPad app is also miles ahead of the Mural iPad app.