Great tool for remote collaboration
Updated January 12, 2024
Great tool for remote collaboration
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Miro
Miro helps our organizations to address various business problems, such as facilitating, remote collaboration, visualizing and organizing ideas and workflows, managing projects, conducting virtual workshops and brainstorming sessions, and creating presentations. The scope of use cases for within our organization is quite broad and varies depending on our needs
- facilitating remote collaboration
- visualizing and organizing ideas
- creating presentations
- a way to communicate with each other or connect it to teams
- time to market
Miro's online whiteboard has significantly improved our organization's collaboration on new projects, especially with remote workers and multiple locations. The platform facilitates seamless teamwork, enabling us to brainstorm ideas, plan projects, and share visual concepts in real-time. The accessibility of Miro has bridged geographical gaps, allowing remote team members to actively contribute and engage in the creative process. The intuitive features make it easy to capture and organize thoughts collaboratively. However, while Miro enhances collaboration, it's crucial to ensure that all team members are familiar with its functionalities for optimal utilization. Overall, Miro has positively impacted our organization by fostering efficient and inclusive collaboration on various projects.
- Figma and Microsoft Teams
Having used Microsoft Teams' whiteboard function and Figma Jam, I find Miro to be a standout choice for collaborative projects. Miro excels in providing an extensive set of features for real-time visual collaboration, making it more versatile than Microsoft Teams' whiteboard. While Teams is integrated into our communication platform, Miro offers a broader range of creative tools and templates, fostering a more dynamic collaboration environment.Comparing with Figma Jam, Miro is more dedicated to general visual collaboration, offering a user-friendly interface and an array of integrations. Figma Jam is powerful for design-specific tasks, but Miro's versatility across various project types makes it my preferred choice. Miro's flexibility, extensive toolset, and user-friendly interface make it the optimal platform for our diverse collaboration needs.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes
Using Miro
- Collaborative Brainstorming and Ideation
- Project Planning and Workshops
- Remote Team Collaboration
- Dynamic Stakeholder Engagemen
- Leveraging Miro for Virtual Team Building
- Training and Onboarding
- Customer Journey Mapping
Evaluating Miro and Competitors
- Ease of Use
The most crucial factor in our decision to purchase Miro was its unparalleled versatility and robust set of features for visual collaboration. Miro's ability to seamlessly facilitate collaborative brainstorming, project planning, and agile methodologies in one platform set it apart. The interactive whiteboard, extensive template library, and integrations provided a comprehensive solution for diverse team needs. The platform's user-friendly interface was an additional advantage, ensuring easy adoption across teams. Ultimately, Miro's versatility made it the single most compelling choice, aligning perfectly with our organization's multifaceted collaboration requirements.
In hindsight, I would enhance the evaluation process by conducting more extensive user trials and seeking direct feedback from various teams within the organization. Additionally, a thorough assessment of specific integration capabilities with existing tools would have been beneficial. Understanding the scalability and long-term support of the platform would also be a critical aspect to consider. Furthermore, involving end-users early in the decision-making process to gauge their specific needs and preferences would provide a more holistic perspective. Continuous communication with Miro's support and development teams for insight into upcoming features and improvements could further inform the decision-making process. Overall, a more collaborative and iterative evaluation approach would ensure a better alignment of the chosen platform with the diverse needs of our organization.
Miro Implementation
- Not sure
300 - Not sure but more than 100.
see above
Miro Support
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Quick Resolution Good followup Knowledgeable team Problems get solved Kept well informed No escalation required Immediate help available Support understands my problem Quick Initial Response | None |
No, and I don't believe it's necessary. The standard support provided meets my requirements, and I haven't encountered issues that necessitate premium support.
Absolutely! Once, I faced a challenging situation while working on a crucial project in Miro. I reached out to their support team for guidance. The representative not only promptly addressed my concerns but went above and beyond by providing a personalized tutorial, sharing advanced features tailored to my project needs.
Using Miro
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using Familiar | None |
- Miro makes brainstorming visually stunning and collaborative
- Effortlessly plan projects with Miro's intuitive interface
- Create intricate mind maps on Miro with ease for enhanced creativity and clarity
- Miro can struggle with large-scale data integration, impacting collaboration on extensive projects