Microsoft Power Automate is an advanced automation platform offering a range of features, including AI-powered automation, robotic process automation (RPA), business process automation (BPA), digital process automation (DPA), and process/task mining. The platform aims to empower organizations to securely automate their operations at scale by leveraging low-code and AI technologies.
$15
per month per user
Nintex Process Platform
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Nintex offers a platform that helps companies discover, automate, and optimize business processes.
Power Automate is very well integrated with Microsoft office 365 suit, Teams channel and SharePoint online. The workflow UI is very user-friendly and the users from non-technical background can easily understand the tool and start automating any simple and complex workflows. …
Power Automate is a no-code/low-code solution tailored for workflow automation, data integration, and AI integration, making it an excellent choice for Microsoft-centric organizations. OutSystems, on the other hand, is a comprehensive application development platform, offering …
I have many years of experience with Nintex applications and it stands up very well against Microsoft Power Automate. I hope Microsoft Power Automate can become the better workflow application. With the Integrated AI builder and continuous updates I expect they can become the …
Nintex is a more powerful workflow tool, but Microsoft is closing the gap with Power Automate. Microsoft Power Automate can do simple tasks very well, and they both can connect to multiple other systems very easily.
Both have their use cases. Nintex Automation Cloud allows external users to submit forms, which Microsoft PowerAutomate or PowerApps doesn't allow. (Power Pages is very costly)
We had a requirement to get all members of an AD group from Azure AD into SharePoint online list which Nintex Workflow for O365 can't do it and we chose Microsoft Flow to perform that action.
In my opinion [Microsoft Power Automate (formerly Microsoft Flow)] is heads and shoulders above Nintex. It was much easier to learn to use and had a much cleaner UI. Nintex and Power Automate both had connections to a lot of platforms but since we used a majority of Microsoft …
Nintex is far easier to use, both O365 and Cloud versions, than Microsoft Power Automate. Nintex used to fall short due to not having the connectors that Flow has, but their Cloud version is catching up very quickly.
Nintex is well suited for highly big enterprise apps, it does come with its own cost and challenges as well. [Microsoft Power Automate (formerly Microsoft Flow)] is greatly suited for creating simple to medium workflows and automations that can be done at every department level …
Power Automate is much easier to learn than Nintex Workflow, with much easier ability to test and debug. Nintex however has a much better workflow approval process with more mature functionality.
Like all plugin type enabler programs, Flow bridges a gap that SharePoint couldn't fill on its own. SharePoint allows for some helpful automation of collaboration, but where it falls short is where Flow has an opportunity to elaborate. On-Prem Nintex and SharePoint 2016 are …
We selected Microsoft Flow because we are Microsoft house. But regardless of that fact, the outside software and services it can interface with is what i feel really sets them apart. The multitude of actions and triggers included in Flow as well the interface is where Flow …
Nintex Process Platform was and still is by far the most flexible and easy-to-use than any of the other form creation and workflow designer apps we looked at.
Nintex Process Platform is much easier to begin with as low code or no code tool, which reduced amount of time and effort to learn and we can start working on it within a few weeks after taking the training session with Nintex. We can build the same application with same …
We got Nintex before microsoft flow was around and K2 at the time was more expensive and didn't have the mobile apps option. SharePoint is licensed per SharePoint Webfront end WFE server and we only had one WFE server.
microsoft flow and power apps requires additional conenctor …
We use Nintex for any workflow that interacts with our users. It provides a much more professional and clean interaction and is easier to design that Power Automate. Power Automate is better at handling some technical scenarios and has good error handling capabilities, but …
Nintex Process Platform is a very affordable and economical tool as it reduces time wastage and operational cost, unlike its alternatives. This tool offers outstanding and responsive technical support services to its customers.
Once you have O365, the obvious choice of tools would be the ones that are part of the platform and are included in your subscription, like PowerApps and Flow. Still, we often choose Nintex Process Platform instead.
Regarding forms, Nintex Process Platform provides a more …
I used SharePoint Designer and Microsoft Visual Studio. We are testing also Microsoft Office 365 Power Automate and Power Apps which are in a competition to the Nintex Workflow Cloud. K2 was not tested but in the focus, at the end the pricing was to expensive for small/mid size …
Nintex is still ahead of the curve on many of its competitors for a number of actions they offer. We do frequently evaluate other tools as many other offerings are rapidly closing the gap. Microsoft Flow has come a long way in the past year and I foresee them giving Nintex a …
Nintex just works and has been working for the past 12 years. It's very easy to use, very efficient and productive. I'll say it's the No1 Digital transformation platform in the world.
Nintex Process Platform is great for more complex and heavy processes as compared to some other similar tools. Additionally, it offers great support in case of any issues.
Power automate offers tough competition to Nintex Process Platform when it comes to citizen development, since MS pushed that option right into the SharePoint list.
Technical staff thinks Nintex stacks up against Power Automate well, short of a string "Connector" story and it is at a disadvantage due to Power Automate being "part" of M365 marketing against that is near impossible. For the most part, we have kept the Nintex platform because …
Microsoft InfoPath. We felt InfoPath isn't as flexible and the functionality it offered was limited compared to Nintex. Also there was information that InfoPath was going to be discontinued (at that time).
Nintex is easier to learn than PowerApps. Powerautomate has better performance and flexibility than Nintex Workflow. We selected Nintex for its mature capability and "no-code" functionality.
These used to be great tools until the new pricing model made them really painful and expensive to use. Nintex pricing is more reliable and we can plan better.
Also PowerApps/Flow don't seem as intuitive to learn, they need some 'development' background.
ITLAQ's SPARK/SPARKnit is not in your list of products. SPARK provides all of the basic functionality of Nintex forms and workflow at a much smaller price. The Microsoft Power Platform is inexpensive, but slightly more difficult to use.