Slack vs. Workplace from Meta (discontinued)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Slack
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Slack is a group messaging or team collaboration app that aims to simplify communication for businesses. Features include open discussions, private groups, and direct messaging, as well as deep contextual search and message archiving, and file sharing. Slack integrates with a number of other tools, such as MailChimp, Dropbox, and Google Drive. Slack was acquired by Salesforce in December 2020. The product is free to use, and also has paid plans with more features and greater controls. The…
$0
Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Workplace was a business communication tool from Meta with features like Live Video and Groups, that connected employees. Its discontinuation began in August of 2025, and by June 2026 a full shutdown is anticipated.N/A
Pricing
SlackWorkplace from Meta (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
Pro
$7.25*
per month per user
Business+
$12.50*
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact Sales
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SlackWorkplace from Meta (discontinued)
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details*Per active user, per month, when paying once a year. Pro is $8.75 USD per active user when paying month to month. Business+ is $15.00 USD per active user when paying month to month.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SlackWorkplace from Meta (discontinued)
Considered Both Products
Slack
Chose Slack
Slack was more of a company directive. Teams has its strengths. But Slack definitely seems more mature in terms of features that engineering teams love. Video conferencing is much better in teams.
Chose Slack
I think it stacks. I haven't seen those products in the last few years, but I feel like the way Slack has evolved and how much integration it has with Salesforce. I don't think any of the other tools I've seen do that.
Chose Slack
In my opinion, the closest to Slack in terms of UI is Discord. But Slack is much more professional with more functionalities that doesn't require very technical knowledge (good for our older staff who began their digital journey within the last decade). In terms of workflow …
Chose Slack
better price and less spam with Slack. It was the best decision to switch to this communication platform for our company. We would do it again if given the opportunity.
Chose Slack
Teams has an edge over Slack as teams is also a meeting platform Copilot by teams is very well integrated tot eams making it super easy to use AI without extra steps and additional integrations Teams is also great with long messages / rewording messages and any vocabulary …
Chose Slack
The other platforms have valuable features (like progress kanbans and storage for big files) but none of them work on their own. Slack is the central hub that we use for all communications, discussions, and meetings.

Slack excels at versatility and ease-of-use. Everyone knows …
Chose Slack
In comparison to Teams, I think Slack is a much nicer platform to use. If your technology department allows you to integrate third party applications, it can work really well paired with zoom, sharepoint etc. I think for many mid sized businesses it can be a good fit to enhance …
Chose Slack
Slack is better suited for actual work teams rather than communities, so it wins against Discord. About HipChat - in my opinion, it was a dinosaur that is not discounted, and it's obvious why, considering the type of product Slack delivered!
Chose Slack
From a corporate standpoint, I don’t really have another example. On a personal level, the closest comparisons would be WhatsApp, Messenger, or KakaoTalk. To me, it feels like — as I said — the corporate WhatsApp. Not that Salesforce wants it to be compared that way or used …
Chose Slack
No, I use many. I use Google Meet, I use teams, I use many others. Again, it's the same, not many things, but if I'm repeating myself, it's all about sharing the information, how quickly it's effective, the quality is good, the huddle is fine, you can share all the, so all the …
Chose Slack
Microsoft Teams feels clunky in comparison to Slack. Slack feels more versatile and intuitive, and much more tech minded then Microsoft Teams does. I would say Microsoft Teams may have the advantage if your business is fully with Microsoft (ie the full Office suite), but other …
Chose Slack
I've dabbled with Microsoft Teams and Zoom's chat features in past roles at startups. Teams integrates well with Office but feels clunky for quick searches and daily chats. Zoom is great for video but lacks robust file sharing and app integrations. Slack wins for us with its …
Chose Slack
Teams and Slack both have Pros and Cons. We use both for communicating. Microsoft Teams is good from the prospective that you can set up Distribution Groups and Private Groups for sharing out links from One Drive and Sharepoint. The integration is built in so that all the …
Chose Slack
Slack has a more modern feel as far as ease of use.
Chose Slack
Slack holds up fairly well with the others. They all have the same basic features. Where they do differ is the execution. You can tell that for Teams and Discord, they had Slack in mind when they were designing their system. These two would be the closest to Slack, even in …
Chose Slack
The applications i have used earlier is not much user friendly, I can not do video calls in groups and tagging system is not available accross the company. Feedback and survey or process updated delivery feature makes Slack different than other companies. Slack is really time …
Chose Slack
I like Slack better than ClickUp, because I would spend 30-60 minutes a day updating my ClickUp tasks. The way ClickUp was used was very micromanaging. I billed by the hour, so I was willing to put in the time to alert the boss what tasks I was working on.

Chose Slack
Teams is better to schedule meetings with and integrates with Outlook well, but that leads to duplicate notifications for things, which is distracting and a waste of time. Messaging in Teams not great compared to Slack, and has the potential to have people outside your …
Chose Slack
Ease of use is a game-changer. Slack works so intuitively. People started collaborating automatically, and digital communities started to appear. We haven't seen that kind of engagement with other tools or workflows. It makes working together fun, and that is something that …
Chose Slack
It's just an actual messaging soft ware to use, compard to other that can be underwhelming or just not useful when your company is growing, Slack keep unity and option for communication that caters anyone, depending on what they feel comfortable and with what type or works they …
Chose Slack
Constant Contact and Microsoft Dynamics 365
Chose Slack
Slack offers great user interface that is easy to navigate through. Customer support team are very user freindly and helpful. The pricing of Slack is fairly affordable compared to other product. Great integration capabilities with other products and the search feature is …
Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
Chose Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
Workplace from Meta just had better features and better support. Their features were released much earlier than Yammer - making innovation top of mind for the company.
Chose Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
Workplace [from Meta] far outstrips the others as it allows you to create an information hub, as well as just enabling conversations. The Newsfeed, Groups and the Knowledge Library all make it really simple for the end-user to find information, and the familiarity of having …
Chose Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
We can compare Workplace in general from email communication (we use Bananatag tool for this). Our email communication and Workplace communication are sometimes competitors. RIght now, we have much higher analytics of email read rate/open rate than on Workplace activity. It may …
Chose Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
Having used both Salesforce Community Cloud and Workplace from Facebook for several years, I can honestly say that there is no comparison between the two. The folks at Facebook know their stuff and how to produce a product that welcomes engagement and this has carried over into …
Chose Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
The other helps out only for files and project management. With Workplace place you can go farther in project management and communication between the different teams. It's really a game-changer for every company that as adopts this tool. If you take it, you will see a really …
Chose Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
I think that Workplace facebook is more intuitive for users than Slack or Yammer, it allows you to create groups and send information to everyone in a cleaner and more accessible way, as well as having more functionalities. In the case of Telegram, the functionality is more …
Chose Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
Workplace is so much better than Slack. It is a far less overwhelming way to message employees and provide input and status updates on projects. I feel like Slack is just a never-ending message board and it's all over the place, but with Workplace's familiar interface to …
Chose Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
I was not involved in the selection process, so I'm afraid I can't be of much help with this. I do know that my company is a stickler for security, though, as well as for making sure that the vendor is financially stable, so I would assume that Workplace by Facebook passed both …
Chose Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
Any other tool used before is not UI familiar as Workplace by Facebook. So now most of companies are migrating to Workplace because it's very easy to use, UI is perfect similar to Facebook which is widely used by everyone now. Also to keep fun in organizations after the …
Chose Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
Slack has very limited features when compared with Workplace by Facebook. It looks like we have to make a group or something like that and start chatting like telegram or WhatsApp. It has some additional features and a professional look when compared with the social media apps, …
Chose Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
I have tried a host of products and found Workplace to be superior to many others based on pricepoint, user interface, features I need and use, and adding some great features I now use. The integration of Live into the Workplace platform is great for team meets, big …
Chose Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
We have used Microsoft Teams and Office 360, and so far are enjoying Workplace.
Chose Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
I always liked basecamp but it isn't perfect for every company. It doesn't have as a diverse field of things it can provide like Workplace by Facebook does. Workplace by Facebook is definitely better in almost every sense other than sharing documents. I think Basecamp is better …
Chose Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
The other video conference tools out there are more polished and robust. We still use Zoom for larger, important calls; calls with clients outside our organization (who don't have access to Workplace by Facebook Chat); and when we need to share screens to a group call …
Chose Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
We used SLACK and Trello, but Workplace is so great that we replaced both. Trello solves other problems with internal communication, our clients improved so much that we only use Trello for special projects. That is very important to us, so it is a great ROI.
Chose Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
Workplace by Facebook offers more features with less of a learning curve than other options, which has helped adoption and usefulness. It is built for communication, which it excels at. However, it is not built to address all business needs and other project management, …
Chose Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
In some ways, Workplace offers some interesting features not always found in similar products. For some, this can be in the form its easy to use screens and interaction features. On the other hand, some of its features are less streamlined, making it hard for users to …
Chose Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
I didn’t! We like that Slack is free-standing and we moved over post the death of Hipchat, so it’s easier to stay there.
Chose Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
Workplace by Facebook has an easy-to-use, interactive and friendly interface compared to the competitors, leveraging the original Facebook design and features to improve user experience and collaboration.
Chose Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
The adoption is over 300% for Workplace by Facebook.
Chose Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
It is free for non-profits, and easy to use. However, it is not very popular. Once the user gets to know this software, it is easy to use. It's also a good connectivity tool -- instant messaging, group chat, files sharing, etc., can be easily done, and can be referred to at a …
Chose Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
Facebook is the one Common word across Globe. Almost Everyone knows how to use it. And if this is capable of handling workplace requirements, then it is perfect competitor for anything in market.
Chose Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
Hangouts is positioning itself as a simpler service. It does not need to have a complete feed or directory of all of the users. Slack works more like Workplace, but feels more limited. Workplace feels more like a community board and can bridge distances between remote teams and …
Chose Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
Facebook is a familiar product, and Yammer wasn't able to match up in the potential uses, such as live video and showcasing albums, etc.
Features
SlackWorkplace from Meta (discontinued)
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Slack
7.9
Ratings
2% above category average
Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Task Management7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts6.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access9.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Search8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools7.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Slack
8.8
Ratings
10% above category average
Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Chat9.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Notifications8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Discussions9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Surveys8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Slack
8.4
Ratings
4% above category average
Workplace from Meta (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Versioning8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Video files8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio files8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Document collaboration8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Access control8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced security features8.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Device sync9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
SlackWorkplace from Meta (discontinued)
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.8 out of 10
Flock
Flock
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Zoho Cliq
Zoho Cliq
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
Axonify
Axonify
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
SlackWorkplace from Meta (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
5.6
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
SlackWorkplace from Meta (discontinued)
Likelihood to Recommend
Slack is ideal for Scrum and agile teams that need continuous communication during sprint planning, daily stand-ups, backlog refinement, testing, and retrospectives. Slack is well-suited for maintaining team knowledge through searchable conversations and dedicated channels, where experienced team members help onboard new QA analysts.
Read full review
I think Workplace by Facebook is a great communication vehicle for any mid-sized to large company. (Since it's more groups-oriented than "regular" Facebook, it might not work well for smaller companies.) I also don't have any idea what the cost is for having it, but that also be a reason that it wouldn't be worth the expense for smaller companies. For larger companies, I think it's a terrific way for folks to communicate with one another and for "the powers that be" to communicate with employees. Facebook Live is only suitable when you have a limited number of people who need to be on screen and it wouldn't really be suitable as a vehicle for instructor-led online training -- it's really most suitable for presentations (although, via the comments area, does allow for questions to be asked in writing)
Read full review
Pros
  • Huddles Run smoothly without any interferences.
  • Smooth individual calls quick and easy without any interruptions.
  • seamless notifications across multiple devices
  • The ability to easily tag a team member to urgently attend to a specific escalation.
  • Slack being user friendly and able to integrate easily with other platforms and apps.
  • How to easily open up different channels for different escalations and needs.
  • a safe direct messaging option.
Read full review
  • It is so easy to introduce to employees because it has the same look and feel as Facebook, which the majority of our employees are already familiar with.
  • It's a communications, collaboration, and file/document sharing tool all rolled up into one. It eliminates the need for other software.
  • Our HR team uses it constantly to keep employees up to date on company news and for polling to get feedback on new initiatives.
Read full review
Cons
  • Would love a better integration with GitHub. For example, notifications when your PR is updated, when review is requested, @-mention in comments, etc.
  • Improved "Later" tab, for example the ability to create to-do lists or making the "Later" tab into a more powerful to-do list (annotate items with notes)
  • More powerful integrations, e.g. Google Calendar could render a calendar view within Slack, rather than sending the daily schedule
Read full review
  • Limited project management options - no good way to track tasks or projects, so other tools are needed.
  • Easy to dismiss for people who don't see the value - the Facebook-like nature of the tool can be a liability when it comes to wanting management to take it seriously.
  • Chat interface has downsides - the standalone chat applications can be a bit buggy, and the chat interface within the web view is not ideal.
  • No intuitive way to message a group - chat options like Slack are better at easily messaging a group or department, where in Workplace you have to be a member of a group to start a conversation.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Slack sitll lacks in functionality. It's better than Skype for Business in many ways, but it is still another chat/message board app. It has limits in free version and paid versions. Also Windows app has errors that bother me, for example, I see number on one of my team's icons. It suggests that one of channels has unread messages; I check all channels - no unread messages, but that "1" still appears
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
My rating was 7. Its intuitive interface and user-friendly features like channels, threads, and integrations make it excellent for team communication and onboarding. However, its usability is held back by the resource-intensive desktop app and cluttered feeling in large workspaces. The mobile app's performance and unreliable notifications have also been noted as weaknesses.
Read full review
Having to download multiple apps just to use the tool is very cumbersome. Facebook would have make this better by wrapping it in as a main feature within their app, but having to use multiple apps to see discussions and walls is so frustrating.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Yes, the app works 24/7. I don't even recall having any period that we could not use since the implementation. Even the maintenance periods are barely noticeable and our work is not impacted by it when it happens.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Slack is a soft app, we don't have many issues with it. I recall one or two people complaining about something during our usage period, but I didn't have a bad experience. When the app is slow, usually the problem is with my computer or my internet. The app works just fine.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Whenever I've had to troubleshoot an issue with Slack (which, to be honest, has not happened very often), their online documentation has been easy to locate, easy to understand, and effective in resolving my issue. Slack's ever-growing popularity also means that there's a large community of practice out there that can be depended upon.
Read full review
Workplace by Facebook is an excellent fit in respect of support and documentation. It has excellent tutorials and documentation, as well. The UI and UX are already great as it is developed and maintained by Facebook, so most of the times, there is no need for any support or documentation.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
I was not part of the implementation team, but I recall being 100% happy and excited to learn and use a new tool. I'm still am to be honest.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Teams and Slack both have Pros and Cons. We use both for communicating. Microsoft Teams is good from the prospective that you can set up Distribution Groups and Private Groups for sharing out links from One Drive and Sharepoint. The integration is built in so that all the Microsoft apps run natively with each other. Slack benefits from organizing different topics in channels that are all under one overarching project. These channels are easily created or destroyed depending on the coding issue at hand.
Read full review
We can compare Workplace in general from email communication (we use Bananatag tool for this). Our email communication and Workplace communication are sometimes competitors. RIght now, we have much higher analytics of email read rate/open rate than on Workplace activity. It may be connected with the fact that there is a lot of communication going on on Workplace. And with the emails we have a dedicated unit to monitor and balance the daily/weekly official email load on the associate. Workplace is a live network. Of course, we as admins balance the posts in official groups. But there are lots of other groups where people post whatever they want (like local communities or communities by interest). Why we keep focus on increasing Workplace engagement instead of email communication is definitely because of this instant feedback that we can get with posting. Email communication cannot create this feeling - it's always a one-way communication in our case.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Our leadership team uses Slack communication to directly reach employees. This allows us to be aligned with the company objectives.
  • Communication amongst the team stays effective and at one place. This improves the alignment.
  • Slack has proven to be effective in managing site incidents. Allows us to dynamically pull resources as needed and get a fix in place.
Read full review
  • Workplace offers a free version and a more enhanced, and really enhanced, paid version. The free version is a nice place to test the waters out and see if you can get it working at your company. We have only had a positive return on investment, measured in time.
  • The on-boarding is where you will see the greatest positive gain. You will quickly be up and running and so will the staff. This will decrease the training and implementation period and for many that means a substantial cost savings.
  • The only negative return that might be realized is if too much time is spent monitoring and policing the content. If trust is there, then employees can share and enhance the use of this tool to be a positive force. As with any communication tool, set guidelines and let the community police itself to some extent.
Read full review
ScreenShots