Why are you sleeping? Wake up with PagerDuty!
Overall Satisfaction with PagerDuty
We primarily use PagerDuty for on-call alerting. We have a number of monitoring platforms that are integrated with PagerDuty or send emails to escalation policies for various teams across the org. We are able to maintain a schedule of individuals in each team and we are able to escalate alerting should current on-call fail to pick up the page.
Pros
- integrates well with the various applications we use
- escalation chain flexibility - allows for stages of increased alerting
Cons
- we don't use all the functionality offered by PagerDuty, no real need
- not always easy to find a historical alert if you dont know the exact alert ID
- application integration
- email alerting
- escalation chains
- centralized alert management for multiple applications
- ease of maintaining and configuring alerts for multiple teams, saving alot of time
- escalation chains have been crucial in ensuring response to critical issues
- rapid response due to multiple alerting methods (text, phone call, email)
I have always taken for granted that PagerDuty is just always available 100% of the time. Depending on when they had an outage, that could be a serious concern if we had a major event at the time because we are quite dependent upon PagerDuty for alerting us of any issues in our environment. This actually is a pro and a con, because they have been so reliable and a con because there is this potentially false sense of security if there is ever an issue that affects our ability to respond to our issues.
We use Logic Monitor (LM) as our primary monitoring platform and so the integration (both ways) is invaluable. When alerts appear in LM and the alert goes to PagerDuty, and acknowledged, if it auto-clears in LM, it will auto clear in PagerDuty. We also use the email integration very heavily, every service has an associated email address which allows you to direct your emails to the specific escalation chains and ultimately the correct people very easily. There are other integrations that our company uses that I am unfamiliar with.
we do not use this
Our analysis of our alerts is handled by our incident management team and we do not use this feature entirely, we pull incident information from PagerDuty and other locations to do our analysis.
- Five9
We have used Five9 for other features but haven't seriously considered using them for replacing PagerDuty. Our company already had PagerDuty when I joined and we haven't evaluated any other option.
Do you think PagerDuty delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with PagerDuty's feature set?
Yes
Did PagerDuty live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of PagerDuty go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy PagerDuty again?
Yes
Using PagerDuty
50 - customer support, software engineering, IT, internal application support, application support, infrastructure, management
3 - minimal, very easy to manage, even a manager such as myself can do it!
- alerting on-call when critical events happen
- central alerting application (single pane of alerting)
- integrates with monitoring software
- simple bash scripts that send emails to pagerduty email integrations
- we are wanting to alert only during certain times of the day so PagerDuty can do time suppression
- we will have to figure out if there is a way to incorporate some automated remediation of issues without alerting on-call
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation