Great bang for your buck!
Overall Satisfaction with SysAid
SysAid is used in our organization as an IT service management and an asset manager. With SysAid, we are able to have a single point of entry for our IT tickets. The dispatcher can assign them and adjust the priority to the available technician. The asset manager makes it easy to track users' hardware.
Pros
- SysAid is quite easy to configure. Adding technician, creating new category or even adding a routing rule is easy and fast.
- SysAid is really cheap for the platform it gives. It has the best ratio of quality/price that I have found on the market.
- SysAid is also easy to install. We were able to implement it in-house.
Cons
- The client agent for the asset manager needs some help. We had a few issues with the OSX version.
- The search in SysAid is not fun to operate. We need to use our own search engine on top of SysAid to make it usable.
- The UI has an early 2000's look.
- The lack of advanced customization makes us do more manual tasks where another ITSM could have automatized it.
- Before we only had email, so SysAid was a big step up in terms of service and productivity.
- SysAid is also used by the manager to see which tech is overloaded. It helps balance the load between the technicians.
Other software were either more expensive or were lacking some features. We looked at Freshservice a year ago but the gain was not enough to cover the more expensive product and the cost of changing the ITSM. Zendesk is well known, but lacks some features like an asset manager. JIRA is in use internally for development, but we didn't find it useful for the IT department.
Do you think SysAid delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with SysAid's feature set?
Yes
Did SysAid live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of SysAid go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy SysAid again?
No
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation