Likelihood to Recommend Very well suited for our company because of their pricing, reliability, speed, detail, and user experience. I don't think there are any scenarios where Accurate wouldn't work for a business
Read full review The functionality the platform holds is top-notch where I can house details regarding contact information, requested rates, what jobs we're submitting them to, and all the personal information (CV, certifications, degrees, etc) that we obtain from our candidates. It's extremely helpful that I am able to submit candidates externally as that is our M.O. routinely. I really like it.
Read full review Pros Read full review Candidate process - sourcing to submittal, do a great job of empowering recruiters Manager contact - single view of contact and all history, makes it very simple to find manager data, history and talking points Reporting - great job with canned reports to help understand where we are across the entire staffing lifecycle Read full review Cons The screening process on the US side took 4+ months to be implemented even though there was no specific request or difficulty on our side: we have a very basic need that Accurate Background is supposed to be implementing easily. Twice in the past Accurate Background's reports have shown blank records ... for people with a criminal history. I receive on a regular basis from Accurate services emails asking for more information. But sometimes this email is not for me but for the candidate. And you never know what complementary information is required. You just receive an email stating "we need more information". You have to chase them to know what they need. I have recently received a message stating that a search is complete. When you open the record, you realize the search has been abandoned. There is a sentence at the end of it stating that you have received an email from their services.... when you have received nothing. All the above shows that there is minimum interaction with real people from their services, that their automatic messages are not complete nor accurate, and that their search results just cannot be trusted. Read full review LinkedIn Sales Navigator Integration (I understand LI is holding this up) Report enhancements (i.e.: growth of hotlists, etc) Integration with SeamlessAI Correct delays with BI, be able to set date range before querying data so that it doesn't lag/not load due to vast data. More consolidated product education. Each person seems to only know about their product and not about the other features a client might ask about. I would like more help with feature enablement/road-mapping how we get there rather than just pointing me toward the help section I would love JobDiva to offer clients JobDiva Super User training so we can have our internal experts who understand the tool and possibilities. Read full review Likelihood to Renew We have invested a lot of time and technically money (on the part of our people) in JobDiva. We had an independent company come in and do a gap analysis to tell us where we were using the product as we should be and where we were not. We are working on correcting things that we are not doing to "best practice" for our business.
Read full review Usability JobDiva is one of the best applicant tracking systems - it's easy for recruiters to use and provides the ability to quickly build a search and filter millions of resumes of available candidates with the required levels of experience, skills or attributes. Jobdiva itself is a very intelligent and powerful tool to recruit and source qualified candidates.
Read full review Performance Over all I think JobDiva works well. It has some issues from time to time, but the support staff seems to handle it quickly. The major issue is the email merges getting black listed as spam. That takes away a very important JobDiva feature. That is our major functionality complaint these days
Gabe Wells Recruiting Process Analyst / Technical Recruiter
Read full review Support Rating Usually, we don't come across downtime or any such issues. However, whenever required, the Support team is always up and ready to solve it as soon as possible. One of its best features is it always Notifies users of any changes related to any of its uses or new additions.
Read full review In-Person Training The support team is quick in responding with to the point answers. Jobidva has few great features like Divareach.
Read full review Online Training I wasnt part of the training as i joined after Ceipal signed agreement with us.
Read full review Implementation Rating This is a SaaS platform so the implementation is easy. One thing to consider is to make sure your organization has agreed to this system. Not all will like it but atleast everyone must understand how this will impact Staffing efforts in a positive way. Once everyone is bought then the rest is smooth. The reason I mention this is because after the implementation some where reluctant to change thus not maximizing JOBDIVA to its full capacity.
Read full review Alternatives Considered Accurate is much better. The most thorough background check company I have ever used.
Read full review Bullhorn seemed very focused on integration with LinkedIn but was missing on other factors.
WinSearch was lacking as an ATS on all fronts, mass email would go to same people, there was no real prevention of duplicates and there was really no great way to link information and easy access later on
Read full review Return on Investment Our turn around time has decreased by half as far as complete background checks are concerned. This allows us to keep our candidates and improve their experience. We averaged a savings of over $2,000/year thanks to Accurate's ability to create customized packages. Read full review It had a positive impact of the number of candidates I was able to reach and which actually helped to increase the hiring rate at one of our clients. The reporting system in JobDiva. It actually helped to focus more on the business objectives instead of documenting about each and every employee. The only negative it had was that in a ew positions (asking for niche skills), when it required to submit candidates in a quick time, the other vendors were able t he win the race. Read full review ScreenShots