Crownpeak Universal Consent Platform vs. SAI360

If you are looking for a consent platform that can be deployed across many domains and is managed from one place this is the product for you. On the other hand, if you have just one page to put the cookie consent banner on, there are definitely cheaper solutions out there.

The usage of ROAM, as well as the integration of external programmes through API and import functions, has almost reduced duplication of work. One thing to keep in mind is that your use cases must be very clear. There are a lot of SAI solutions, and their titles don't always correspond to what they actually perform.

• Easy-to-use UI - straightforward navigation, minimal issues
• Simple implementation when it comes to tagging
• Helpful support team when issues arise (that rarely happens, however)

• Customized unified design platform
• Modules that fit your organization
• Low technology involvement with information department.
• Built on foundational platforms some bidirectional in the ERM framework with TPRM contracts
• Single sign-on web-based applications

• Enterprise company management in order to get access at market level
• Reporting at market level

• Reporting
• Legacy modules (i.e. tasks)
• Look and feel
• Intuitive UI

As stated, the UI is rather easy to navigate and it serves its intended purpose. Pulling tags from the Evidon UI is straightforward, and implementation issues are quite rare.

Overall it is a very versatile system that does help to keep our processes automated and secure. We are able to streamline our day to day activities.

Ease-of-use, straightforward, rarely has any issues.

The initial process is not clear but after the first cookie banner all others are faster to implement.

It offers less customization.

Archer was very similar to SAI360 in cost and features. Has a more modern look and feel and more task functionality. The price point was very similar. Didn't choose them as our existing usage is in an On-Prem version and support from our in-house IT team was not able to be obtained. MetricStream was very modern looking with an intuitive UI. Appeared to have all the features with a number of additional bells and whistles. The price point was far above our budget and we could not get approval to move them to the RFP.

• the percentage of people allowing for cookies is around 50%

• The system is costly for the initial setup
• Does help to mitigate risk and keep the vendors and internal departments from becoming non-compliant.
• One license for all users
• Easy to manage employee's security access