Time-Saving Split-Testing
October 02, 2019
Time-Saving Split-Testing
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Optimizely
We are using it extensively on the Marketing team for split testing. We often want to test 2 or more options of a designed/developed web page, and using Optimizely to split test is very helpful. It allows us to use data to see how changes to our website affect performance and user behavior.
- Split Testing. It makes it very clear when one of many options is declared "the winner".
- Targeting classes and other HTML/CSS elements when making changes.
- Serving up different digital experiences to different demographics.
- The preview window is very buggy. Often, tests will break, and something the bugs will cause the website to look wonky and broken as well--when it isn't actually broken. It really needs to be a more seamless experience, because it is sometimes hard to trust the preview window when you're trying to see how the test will look to hundreds of thousands of people.
- Load times. Sometimes the load times for certain pages in the app are very long.
- The HTML editor pane when clicking on an element that has a ton of nested HTML can often bug out and only show the first 10 - 20 lines of code before going completely blank. It would be really awesome if we could fully switch the view to HTML view, choose our elements and classes that way, and then switch back to the Visual view.
- It has helped save a lot of time by either validating or disproving our design decisions and hypotheses.
We chose Optimizely specifically for its split testing and advanced audience segmentation capabilities. It makes it way easier to see which option objectively performs better.