Bitbucket from Australian-headquartered Atlassian offers source code management and version control.
$0
per month
Jira Software
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Jira Software is a project management tool from Atlassian, featuring an interactive timeline for mapping work items, dependencies, and releases, Scrum boards for agile teams, and out-of-the-box reports and dashboards.
$81.85
per month 10 users
Pricing
Bitbucket
Jira Software
Editions & Modules
Free (up to 5 users)
$0
per month
Standard
$3
per user/per month
Premium
$6
per user/per month
Data Center
1,980
per year
Standard
$8.15
per month per user (minimum 10)
Premium
$16
per month per user (minimum 10)
Data Center
$44,000
per year 500 users
Enterprise
Contact Sales
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Bitbucket
Jira Software
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Bitbucket
Jira Software
Considered Both Products
Bitbucket
Verified User
Manager
Chose Bitbucket
Using Bitbucket, GitHub, AccuRev, and svn over my dev career, I like Bitbucket the most. It's nice web UI and integration with JIRA and Sourcetree make it my favorite SCM solution.
We have chosen bitbucket mainly because we already use JIRA, Confluence and HipChat from the same brand and BitBucket simply was looking like the natural solution. Gitlab and GitHub weren't giving the same integration with the other apps. We like Atlassian and we trust their …
Naturally, Bitbucket will be compared to GitHub, that has reached a tremendous importance in the open source software industry. Overall, Bitbucket comes with similar set of features as GitHub. Bitbucket brought a good integration with other Atlassian products (especially Conflue…
I selected Bitbucket due to the reasons I've listed before. It is free for individuals and small teams of up to five people. It allows for unlimited private and public repos. It integrates with JIRA automatically. It also has a nifty tool for existing repository importing which …
Bitbucket has been preferred because, in my opinion, it had a better UI, and easier integrations with things like Slack. Also, because it is an Atlassian-owned product, it integrates very very nicely with JIRA (which I've often used in conjuction with Bitbucket).
Gitlab has better CI pipeline integrations GitHub is more widely used in the open-source community and hence it has a much bigger user base Bitbucket is appropriate for companies with small to medium-sized teams, specially if using JIRA integration
Bitbucket was inherited from an acquisition and not used by choice. The acquired company chose Bitbucket because - at the time - they were the market leader for private source code repositories and the team was already using JIRA.
For the features we were looking at, Bitbucket, GitHub and GitLab were all at par and were in a similar price range. We found that GitHub was the most full featured should we need to scale very quickly. GitLab was at par with GitHub for our future needs, but GitHub was a more …
When GitHub was acquired by Microsoft my previous organization had concerns about paywalls and additional restrictions that might be placed on the projects. We had made a move to Bitbucket as a result. The acquisition didn't seem to have any implications on the overall …
1. GitHub is open source and also many security vulnerabilities because it is open source. That's one of the main reasons we chose BitBucket. 2. BitBucket integrates natively with other Atlassian tools without any custom configurations.
I have used Tortoise SVN in the past with various teams. Tortoise SVN is open-source and has a lot of valuable functionality built in. That being said, Bitbucket is more user-friendly being that there is a decent user interface. The UI is not great, but it still makes working …
Bitbucket uses Git as a client which is more advanced with lots of features for source code management tool. It is very easy to scale horizontally as per our needs, and recent new features like adding multiple file systems keep Bitbucket more useful. Due to multiple file …
I have implemented other products such as GitHub, although it is a platform with many optimal tools for developers. Its interface is not very easy to use, while this software provides a much more intuitive and user-friendly interface, and although it is a software that may be …
We have not selected Bitbucket yet. Currently, we are still using Confluence for file sharing versioning. We also explored sharing project files through LabVantage and or Shared Folders (network drives).
I haven't really researched a whole lot with GitHub or SourceForge. I know there are a lot of people that use GitHub and it has kind of become a bit part of the industry. Whenever i have used GitHub to submit pull requests it has also seemed pretty easy to do, but I haven't …
GitHub has a huge community to support, so, beside the price, is the best tool I've used as a git server. Gitlab is very similar to BitBucket, and for a free version as less limitations. Also is cheaper for companies, but doesn't have a smooth integration with JIRA. Also has a …
It is free for a small team up to five users which makes it appealing for anyone starting out. The other plans are also reasonable too. Since Bitbucket is a part of the Atlassian Inc., there is a seamless integration between Jira. Also, the integration with Trello is an added …
The primary reasons we went with Bitbucket over TFS and/or other options are as follows: 1) Ability to integrate with other documentation and development tools we were using. 2) Cost - with our size and current business needs, we were able to implement what we needed in …
Bitbucket provides a better price compared to the others as well as private repositories for people who do not want everything they do to be completely public and accessible for all to see.
Our organization previously used GitHub as our VCS host and the move to Bitbucket has been very smooth and without any hassles, our team really enjoys the simple and easy to use UI over GitHub which allows for interactive code reviewing, the code search engine is also more …
I have also used Gitlab and GitHub. There are pros and cons to using each version control system. While Gitlab has a much better interface and is easier to use, it has fewer features and integrations than BitBucket. GitHub is king, but costs money for private repositories. …
I have used Gitblit and GitHub apart from bitbucket. The only thing bitbucket lacks is the ability to create issues against commits like GitHub issues and a similar feature in Gitblit.
Lead Consultant - Solutions Architect - Software Engineer
Chose Jira Software
Jira Software works for many development environments, has custom workflows, is friendly, stable, robust, and can be integrated with the most recognized DevOps tools on the market.
Trac is as basic as the subversion with which it's often associated in feature set, requires signifiant time and patience to set up much less customize/configure, and is being abandoned by most industry folks. Bugzilla is a classic solution which holds up, but has an interface …
Jira had the full package and had a lot of options as a task management tool, good for tickets and a complex user management interface to split up permissions within our company and for our clients. We can integrate with Bitbucket and work through tickets development, design …
The main reason we chose JIRA over Trello was the ability to host on-premise. Security concerns with our data drove that requirement and is why we ultimately settled on JIRA. JIRA also provided us with integrations we needed to integrate with other tools that we use.
JIRA is way better than the IBM Rational suite, in every way i can think of, right from the user experience and look and feel. For someone who spends a lot of time per day with these tools it makes a big difference to their overall productivity.