Miro provides a visual workspace for innovation that enables distributed teams of any size to dream, design, and build the future together. Today, Miro counts more than 60 million users in 200,000 organizations who use Miro to improve product development collaboration, to speed up time to market, and to make sure that new products and services deliver on customer needs.
$10
per month per user
Notion
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Notion aims to present users with an all-in-one workspace — for notes, tasks, wikis, and databases, from Notion Labs in San Francisco.
$5
per month per user
Pricing
Miro
Notion
Editions & Modules
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month (billed annually) per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
contact sales
annual billing per user
Personal Pro
$48
per year per user
Team
$96
per year per user
Enterprise
Custom
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Miro
Notion
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
Monthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.
Actually, it doesn't stack up against them, as we're using all of them. Jira is much more tailored toward backlog, ticket, and sprint management, and although we tried to use Miro for it, it didn't have features packed that Jira is on that specific point, but what it lacks on …
draw.io is a dated collaborative diagramming product and is very limited in what you can do with it. Its saving and collaboration system is convoluted and frustrating to use. Miro's cloud-saving process requires no action from the user and just works out of the box. …
To be honest, I used a really short amount of time, and I didn't know Miro back then. When I started working in another company that is using Miro and has a license, I met with Miro. So, I don't have a lot to share about Whimsical. But I didn't think of using it after Miro.
Miro does what it does very well: infinite white board space for people to collaboratively and remotely throw ideas against the wall. Once you know what you are trying to do, though, the other tools are more useful for actioning against what was plotted in a Miro board.
Actually, my company migrated to FigJam, and I can certainly understand why. The connection with Figma is incredible, allowing for a smooth and natural workflow, which is essential in today's competitive environment. FigJam provides fantastic features, such as real-time …
Miro has a vast campus to use freely and access with colleagues and clients in real-time. It is very useful to see the same page with them. The above products do not have such a feature; they focus on task management and project management. So, we adopted both products.
Miro is extremely visual, and multi-platform support combined with a huge template library leaves it head and shoulders above the rest. Adding carefully crafted visual ingredients makes every work session a breeze to interact with and contribute in terms of ideas and concepts. …
Miro and MURAL are very similar indeed, but Miro is like a young and cool person who is ready to take the world, and MURAL is a little bit more formal. Miro has superb drawing capabilities, even the drawing and dragging shapes feature is better in Miro (Still a point of …
Miro is still slightly more full-featured when compared to FigJam, but doesn’t hold up when compared to creating high-fidelity UI designs and prototypes in Figma. While similar in feature set - meaning infinite canvas, multimedia handling, document, and image markup - Miro is …
I haven't used any other products. But Freemind mapping web based could be one alternative. However, Miro plays an essential and professional tool. It helps employers, students, educators, and presenters in explaining and/or collaborating on the projects. Miro has integration …
Miro is simpler to navigate through the board, and zoom in/out capabilities are better. I think Miro has the exact amount of features, it is good in providing value and tools to collaborate while still keeping it simple
There are small differences that eventually pile up and make working with Mural a mediocre experience and working with Miro an enjoyable one. Things that don't work so well in Mural: when you drag shapes around, they lose arrow connections; the size of the board is very limited …
I've never used OneNote, but i friend of mine did, and she told me that actually OneNote it's better for studies, cause it has a open drawing board so it's better to organize our thoughts. Even if i find those two tools similar, they have different purposes, but i think it …