Miro provides a visual workspace for innovation that enables distributed teams of any size to dream, design, and build the future together. Today, Miro counts more than 60 million users in 200,000 organizations who use Miro to improve product development collaboration, to speed up time to market, and to make sure that new products and services deliver on customer needs.
$8
per month per user
Webex App
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
The Webex App brings together Webex Calling, Meetings, and Messaging into a single application, fostering collaboration and unlocking more productive ways to work.
$0
user/month
Pricing
Miro
Webex App
Editions & Modules
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
Miro does not support UML well. I used plaintext daily, which is critical; however, miro missed that kind of feature. I use Miro mainly for drawing and collaboration between team members. It has its strength and cannot be missed in daily work without it. I highly recommend this …
Overall, we feel Miro is hard to beat. Its extensive list of features covers major parts of a business process and its collaboration abilities are second to none. Furthermore, its transparency around security and reasonable pricing make it hard for us not to go for it.
Miro has been my favorite as opposed to Bluescape and Asana. Bluescape felt a bit outdated and not as smooth to use. Asana did not have the extent of flexibility or features for the purposes we wanted.
MURAL is similar, but I do not like the restriction on the project size and number of panels - Miro reduces some of these unnecessary barriers. Otherwise, I don't remember the other big differences between the two very similar product. I do think the naming is a little strange, …
I am just more familiar with Miro. And I really dislike how draw.io looks, it looks very 1990s, and I am not sure if it is because of my setting or not, but when my co-worker makes an update there, I don't see updates in real-time. I can only see it after my co-worker saved it.
It has very similar features to the others mentioned; a lot of the basic functionality of using objects, text, and sticky notes. It seems to have the same learning curve as a result. However, we have now switched over to Figma for design and it would be nice to have more …
Except for a wide range of MS-Office products i didnt work with direct competitors of miro, so i cant tell a lot about it, but one thing i can surely tell, miro is in every way superior to the microsoft alternatives and workarounds, no doubt.
I didn't select Miro personally, this is just the platform my university has chosen to use. But I can say that Miro is a more sophisticated and functional platform than Google Jamboard (likely because Jamboard is available freely and meant for non-enterprise use).
Overall, Figma has a better interface and it's easier for sharing, but Miro is just as good in terms of allowing users to develop and put ideas to test.
Miro is a very advanced and mature platform with so many features available. It is wise to say that no other tool is having such a wide set of features and tool for effective collaboration than Miro has. It also has a huge range of integration options available unlike any other …
Miro is significantly superior to Visio and Figma for the purpose it serves i.e. collaboration. MURAL could be a close competitor, but from my last experience, MURAL lagged more and had fewer templates and visuals to play with.
Lately, Webex is adopting many features of MS Teams. Both platforms can be used interchangeably, really depends on the participants and which platform is more compatible with all so that we can expect [fewer] problems for the planning and also during the execution of the meeting.