Overall Satisfaction with Appian
The Appian platform is being used by multiple business groups within our organization, including actuary, finance, product design and marketing teams. We are relying on Appian to solve a variety of business needs, from the simple to the most complex processes that require lots of integration work.
- Rapid prototyping - Very important for us as we are increasingly Agile and do not typically have a full set of requirements at hand.
- Open architecture - for the times when there is a need to lift the hood, Appian is entirely standards-based and easy to integrate in our ecosystem.
- User friendly - No need to have a computer science degree, business users can handle the very intuitive interface with minimal training.
- There are still too many instance where code needs to be written in order to implement the desired functionality.
- The licensing model could be simplified. The user-based model isn't practical.
- The high-frequency release cycle is difficult for us to keep up with.
- A significant amount of application developer resources have been freed up and re-allocated to high-value initiatives.
- While we have not precisely quantified the financial ROI of deploying the Appian platform, the efficiency gains are obvious and have been recognized throughout our senior executive team. Functions that required days or weeks now take a fraction of what they used to.
- One negative impact is that due to its popularity we have an increasing backlog that of projects that we're having to manage. A great problem to have, for sure.
From a capabilities standpoint Appian and the other products we evaluated covered the core functionality we needed. But we liked how quickly Appian evolves and includes new standards and features as they emerge (things like responsive, for example). We also liked the Cloud option, which at the time wasn't very mature for the competing products.