Initial thoughts on ScienceLogic SL1
Updated March 03, 2021
Initial thoughts on ScienceLogic SL1
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with ScienceLogic SL1
We are using ScienceLogic SL1 for our managed services business. It is used to manage and monitor all internal infrastructure as well. As of yet, we haven't addressed any milestones from our previous monitoring tool. COGS are a first-hand business problem that it has addressed.
- User friendly
- SNMP monitoring
- Powerpacks
- Dynamic applications features
- BGP monitoring
- Improve Windows monitoring
- COGS reduction
Yes - Zenoss
Not yet. This is too early for us to look into this particular topic. ScienceLogic SL1 was deployed in Dec 2019. Currently, we are going through a lot of fixes and functionality that we need to incorporate/enable/change so we adhere to SLAs.
We see it has significant value to the question here, however, we have not had time to quantify and evaluate.
We see it has significant value to the question here, however, we have not had time to quantify and evaluate.
We are looking to grow SL1 into Monitoring as a service platform with joint venture.
We are leveraging ITOM to have major workflows action calls.
- Client view
- Dashboards
- Reporting
- Zenoss Cloud, DX Infrastructure Manager (formerly CA Unified Infrastructure Management), Evanios, Kaseya Traverse and SolarWinds MSP Manager
COGS and Helpful in terms of adoption across the board for all teams.
ScienceLogic SL1 Implementation
- Implemented in-house
Yes - Build
configure
test
configure
test
Change management was minimal - Normal security procedure allowing traffic to operate on ports. No major issues.
- None for our organization