Adobe Workfront, acquired by Adobe in late 2020, is a web-based project-management tool. It is designed for both IT and marketing teams, but can be implemented for any kind of project. Workfront offers all the features standard to project management platforms, as well as resource allocation, automation, and agile workflow.
N/A
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Salesforce Sales Cloud is a platform for sales with a community of Sellers, Sales Leaders, and Sales Operations, who use the solution to grow sales and increase productivity. The AI CRM for Sales features data built right in, so that companies can sell faster, sell smarter and sell efficiently. Salesforce Sales Cloud is used for, and supports: Buyer Engagement Sales Engagement Enablement Sales AI Sales Analytics Team…
It's been a while since I've used another time and resource management platform, but I would say that Adobe Workfront takes the cake. Its newly refreshed user interface is simple to navigate, whereas other platforms can be quite confusing when "drilling down" on a project. …
JIRA and Clarizen were too complicated and did not offer an integrated document review and proofing system. Microsoft Project did not handle multiple small projects and resource allocation as well. Smartsheet was too limited for large teams and required too much manual work.
Workfront beats them all hands down. Asana was too simplistic for our needs, Wrike was very clunky and didn't handle the finances very well. Clarizen didn't have document approvals and collaboration that we needed. Workfront was a great mix of ease of use, complexity, and …
As mentioned we are using Team Foundation Services for our Agile Scrum delivery although Workfront does has its own Agile project management capability. I've seen numerous work management systems on the market (for instance SalesForce), but these appear to be a collection of a …
Workfront is a much better product than Salesforce. Workfront has a much better reporting system and can pull necessary details from just about any field or box. Workfront has better work flow templates and is much more customizable. Additionally, we can do a lot of the …
MS Project provides similar core project management functionality (task lists, Gantt charts, resource allocation) but it does come close to Workfront's capabilities related to custom data, forms, ticket queues, notes (updates), and especially reporting and dashboards.
Miles ahead, literally no comparison. Workfront is much more flexible and more easily customized, without having the techno-dribble training you have to go through with other tools.
I didn't select Workfront, honestly. I'm sure it was selected because of its ability to track time to the smallest measure, but I firmly believe that teams would be better served by any of the communication enablement applications listed above. Which is a fancy way of saying …
We needed a system that was easy to use, had great support and training available, and allowed us to track time and manage projects. After reviewing about 30 different options it was clear that AtTask offered all that and more.
This comes down to what I mentioned in the pluses of the tool. Out of the box it had more things pre-done so you could literally use it day one if you wanted to. Not recommended since more of the functionality needs to be configured, but day 1 it could be used. SharePoint and …
During the latter half of 2012 I led an evaluation of 3 SaaS/cloud-based project management tools including AtTask, LiquidPlanner and Copper Project for one of my clients. My final conclusion ranked the tools in that order, especially since project portfolio capabilities were …
I've used simpler CRMs such as Copper and Hubspot in my past. Hubspot is a pretty straightforward CRM, but it's ability to be customized is nowhere near Salesforce.com. Copper (formerly Prosperworks) was a nicely designed CRM, but it is know as the "CRM for G-Suite". Now, in my …