Planview AdaptiveWork PricingFormerly Planview Clarizen

It was the most cost effective and easiest to implement

We've been able to deliver better, faster, and cheaper.

~3 hour resource cost savings per project setup Accuracy of data up 17% … evaluated Kantana. Ultimately decided on Planview AdaptiveWork because of cost, ease of GUI, ease of configuration, reporting capabilities and integration

Planview AdaptiveWork was the right size, at the right price point that fit our customization and integration flexibility. It is intuitive

Implementation of the application reduced our internal operating cost for project management by 25% over previous platform. We were able to reduce … into our workflow and provides means of providing data toward application cost of ownership. SharePoint allows seamless integration…

and balance for our projects. Management meets weekly on the revenue and cost forecasts and monthly we True up the Adaptive work forecasted revenue to

Allows visibility to when we begin to realize contract value. Allwos us to review gaps or inefficiencies in our project timelines. Allows

reports to help identify types of projects for which we're under charging for implementation fees We use the notes tracking for assisting with post mortems when … use Clarizen to manage customer implementations. It helps us track project cost/scope/time and also allows us to keep project records tied to that information … when projects go off the rails We use the tracking of AR…

employees track time and seeing bookings and availability. It was less expensive and did all of what we needed it to do and none of what we didn't. It wasn't

bottom line is that the tool is always accessible and easy to use. The value pricing means it's well worth the investment and is easily justifiable. … bottom line is that the tool is always accessible and easy to use. The value pricing means it's well worth the investment and is easily justifiable. … "app" is desperately in need of some work - it d…

We got locked into good price and it is user friendly. Was good choice as we were establishing the IT PMO

Unless they raise the price of it, I don't see why we would change from Clarizen at the end of our subscription period. … Price Product Features Positive … The most important was the price and functionality as compared to rival products such as MS-Project and

Clarizen has the best cost-benefit ratio. Also has more efficient set of capabilities related to social

the simplicity of business users, and comparable product to higher end expensive tools like MS Project suites. Although not much in the way of reporting

requests, I can be assured that my request hasn't fallen upon deaf ears. The pricing structure for Clarizen is simple to understand but if you have a large organization … probably going to need to look elsewhere for a solution due to the current pricing structure.

via total effort or time spent. Time spent can be represented in monetary values to help track the expenditures of a project in line with each task. Time … schedule projects faster using templates and manage them easier with reporting. Cost was easily justified in the time saved by end users once correctly set up … incentivize end users, and synchronize data with our CRM sys…

multi platform SaaS solution, available also on cell phone devices. The price of licenses is really accessible and most of our engineers are already familiar … (when used properly) is perceived very positively by the customer. It adds value to our company. Makes communication within our project very easy therefore … multi platform SaaS solution, available also on c…

different reasons why we chose Clarizen but ease of use, functionality and price and adaptability were our top reasons. … I was able to negotiate the Excel-Add In for reporting at no charge.

Time tracking. Understanding how much does a customer cost. Tracking what products and features have gone live. Technical staff backlog … conflict with standard terms. The only term we negotiated was the per license fee.