Microsoft Teams vs. Miro

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Teams
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.
$4.80
per month per user
Miro
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Miro is the AI Innovation Workspace that brings teams and AI together to plan, co-create, and build the next big thing, faster. With the canvas as the prompt, Miro's collaborative AI workflows keep teams in the flow of work, scale shifts in ways of working, and drive organization-wide transformation.
$10
per month per user
Pricing
Microsoft TeamsMiro
Editions & Modules
Microsoft Teams Essentials
$4.80
per month per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month (paid yearly) per user
Microsoft Teams Enterprise
$5.25
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Basic
$7.20
per month per user
Microsoft 365 Business Standard
$15
per month per user
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month (billed annually) per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
contact sales
annual billing per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft TeamsMiro
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsDiscounts are available for non profit organizations.Monthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft TeamsMiro
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Teams
Chose Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams is a complementary tool I used in my software panel. So it can cover many cases where partners are not using the same tools as the ones used in my firm. It is a complementary tool with other ones like Miro, Slack, and Jira, for example, in order to facilitate …
Chose Microsoft Teams
With Microsoft Teams you can better check each one's agenda. The background when in a meeting is better. Microsoft Teams also have more options for integrations in place.
It's also easier and more intuitive.
It also offers more options of communicating and not only video …
Chose Microsoft Teams
Teams is the best of the company message tools that I have used so far because it integrates so many functionalities. Teams goes way beyond the instant messaging or video calls features with screen-sharing. It integrated with your calendar, enables you to do task tracking (e.g. …
Chose Microsoft Teams
User experience is of a higher level and integrates well into Outlook. Using the tool to facilitate user testing with participants outside the company is a breeze too.
Chose Microsoft Teams
Moving to Microsoft Teams from IBM Sametime chat services provided Intact a great ahead into the productivity and response times for both internal and external customers/brokers. Sametime doesn't have the capability to make voice calls from either a desktop or a mobile app …
Miro
Chose Miro
Miro offers greater versatility and scalability than Mural and FigJam for cross-functional use. FigJam primarily serves design teams, while Mural focuses on structured workshops, and Miro supports a much broader array of use cases, including strategy, marketing, client …
Chose Miro
The main thing is having everything centralized in a single tool. We can have on board for retros and keep our previous one documented, we can have a board for one particular project and all diagrams related to it organized, all while using one single tool and one single …
Chose Miro
Has lost of versatile templates and excellent tools for visual collaboration .
Chose Miro
We did not choose Miro as standard, but features stand out why it was used for workshops.
Chose Miro
I tried other tools like Mural and FigJam before using Miro. FigJam was easy to understand, but it felt too simple for the kind of big projects my team works on. Mural was fine, but it did not have enough features to handle complex work or large teams. Miro worked much better …
Chose Miro
Mentimeter and Kahoot are very good for short Q&A, or to test the knowledge of your students via quizzes, as well as to explore their opinions. Miro is useful for more in-depth activities where different people can contribute to developing/creating a product of learning/a …
Chose Miro
The all in one tool aspect is hard to beat. None of the others are really able to cover Agile Methodologies, Technical diagramming and Workshop Facilitation and Presentations in the one tool.
Chose Miro
Miro has been nice to use because there are fewer limitations allowing for more creativity and unrestricted freedom. It's also a nice touch to have a large variety of templates to choose from. However, Miro does have a bit more of a learning curve as most things that are more …
Chose Miro
lucidspark is doing great but still delivers a disjointed experience (some features in Lucid Chats, others in Lucid Spark) - They do a better job providing pages inside the document - also more flexibility with customization

FigJam is deeply integrated to Figma, so brings some …
Chose Miro
I have used Slack, jira, and draw.io before. Slack is great for quick communication and Jira helps track tasks, but Miro stands out for its visual thingy.
Unlike draw.io, Miro is more flexible and interactive also has better and flexible sticky or frames, allowing teams to …
Chose Miro
The main alternative we run into is Microsoft Whiteboard, served via teams. While it is functional, the experience is lacking against Miro.

Chose Miro
Miro has always been my goat. I have been using it since it came out and I don't think I could ever choose any of the other ones. It's so much better to see the other people work simultaneously as you and communicating with them and copy and pasting in and out of each other's …
Chose Miro
It has a whiteboard app, but it lacks the functionality that Miro offers. I wish there were a microdot task integration. I like that I can tag myself or others in Microsoft products (i.e., PowerPoint, Word, Excel, etc.) and it will populate in my to-do list.
Chose Miro
Miro offers a better user experience and options, in my opinion. While the other tools each had their strong point, it was good to find a great product like Miro that offers to do it all in one centralized location. It's almost plug and play with a very straightforward setup. …
Chose Miro
I haven't used MindMap but I do know the product; I think Miro is just much easier to use and to share it with other colleagues.
Chose Miro
We ran a business case analysis for these, and they didn't come close. Visual omnipresent collaboration is a must; list of different features is way longer in Miro; Kanban and its views is less clunky and requires less fiddling out of the box — Trello needed to be set up …
Chose Miro
I was a while ago that I use Mural. At that stage the features where similar. However, Miro has developed at a very quick pace and is always adding features to improve the product, so I have had no reason to look elsewhere.
Chose Miro
I used a bit Microsoft Whiteboard some years ago, but at this time it was far behind Miro
Chose Miro
Miro basically cover the needs of all the other tools. I started using Miro extensively during the pandemic and at that point only Jamboard provided similar options and was free when collaborating in a bigger group and when not everyone had a license. This is still the main …
Chose Miro
We tried using Microsoft whiteboard on teams, the ease of use is not the same. Miro ease of use is superb in terms of post-its, visualizing & collaborating. We do have our calls on teams & go to the Miro, which would be interesting for us to start exploring the teams calls on …
Features
Microsoft TeamsMiro
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
7.8
232 Ratings
1% above category average
Miro
-
Ratings
Task Management7.7171 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts7.489 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling7.9199 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation7.9119 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access8.0221 Ratings00 Ratings
Search7.2203 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools8.3136 Ratings00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
7.9
241 Ratings
1% below category average
Miro
-
Ratings
Chat8.9240 Ratings00 Ratings
Notifications8.2239 Ratings00 Ratings
Discussions8.5226 Ratings00 Ratings
Surveys8.0137 Ratings00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase8.5150 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting6.547 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts5.743 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook9.1155 Ratings00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Teams
8.0
226 Ratings
0% below category average
Miro
-
Ratings
Versioning8.4159 Ratings00 Ratings
Video files8.2193 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio files8.6192 Ratings00 Ratings
Document collaboration8.7206 Ratings00 Ratings
Access control8.5188 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced security features8.3148 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive5.353 Ratings00 Ratings
Device sync8.4162 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft TeamsMiro
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft TeamsMiro
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(281 ratings)
9.1
(6070 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
3.7
(9 ratings)
9.4
(185 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(67 ratings)
8.6
(451 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(1 ratings)
9.5
(20 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(19 ratings)
Support Rating
8.3
(113 ratings)
7.7
(63 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(7 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(3659 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(14 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
6.3
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(4001 ratings)
Product Scalability
10.0
(1 ratings)
8.6
(19 ratings)
Professional Services
7.0
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
6.6
(7 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(8 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft TeamsMiro
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
It is well-suited for an organization with many team members who are scattered throughout different locations. It offers organization and clarity to projects, files, and tasks in one centralized location. It would be a bit of an overkill for a small organization where everyone is in the same location 5 days a week
Read full review
Miro
I couldn't find any scenarios where Miro is not appropriate. I use it day by day and create processes and visual boards, and use it for any type of project that I implement. It's very easy to navigate and very easy to actually create it from scratch, so most scenarios that I used Miro for were:

to design the customer journey,
process design for different types of processes (like an onboarding process or a community implementation or a customer portal tool implementation)
to document new workflows that I'm building. It applies across all customer operations roles, even if the tool wasn't built for customer operations. I used it so far in the past five years or so in more than five or six job titles that I had with different functions and hats, and supported me during all these job functions that I managed
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Makes communication and collaboration easier through Chat.
  • Lets us personalize and humanize face-to-face interactions through Meetings.
  • Helps me effectively plan out my day through Calendar.
  • Enables us to safely store and access our information through OneDrive.
  • Simplifies calls and voice communication.
Read full review
Miro
  • Makes internal coordination between admin team and tutors extremely painless. It's like a single place where everyone can drop ideas, get updates and notes without loss of context which usually happens in long email threads.
  • Versioning and board history are handled very well, which drastically reduces the workload. They help me track how a policy or math guideline has evolved, and also make it easy to revert changes if something doesn't work.
  • Comments stick exactly where they are meant to, making internal reviews much clearer. Admins don't have to guess which note refers to which rule or section.
  • Exports are clean, so even non-Miro teammates get it instantly.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • the calendar function can improve it's not 100% feature parody with outlook.
  • Better search for documents and contact with AI
  • offer the same security for document sharing as is available in outlook. Especially concerning PII and documents shared to "external" contacts.
  • Contact is hidden away in "Calls" and needs to be better exposed like it use too.
Read full review
Miro
  • Text and size formatting - when you copy and paste items they come through tiny (always keep the paste to scale of what the rest of the project scale is
  • Excel linking - I want to be able to integrate excel documentations for prototyping ideas
  • Some extra templates and start up positions - just so it allows the user to be more creative (maybe a draw template option, so the AI can create you a template bespoke to you company)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
Microsoft Teams is included with our Office 365 subscription and we have no intention of migrating off of Office 365 and Microsoft products. Since Microsoft Teams is included for free with our Office 365 subscription, and since we enjoy all the features, benefits, and functionality, there is no question that our team will continue to use the product
Read full review
Miro
I have advocate for the renew of Miro quite few times, however, it is not under my control as the decision is made in another team with their own budget. I would buy for my own entrepreneur projects (1-2 members) as I do know the value and work there 100%. So, I would pay out of my own pocket to get the value. However, If I wouldn't know the value it provides, it would be hard to decide with the current freemium features
Read full review
Usability
Microsoft
If you have the full Microsoft Office suite, it works really well because it's integrated well within its ecosystem, but if not, it can be annoying because it tries to open a shared file in the web versions of the file equivalents. The web version is also a bit slow, and the login is very difficult to handle if you have multiple Microsoft or Outlook accounts.
Read full review
Miro
I find Miro an overall easy to use tool, but I think that it needs more tutorials to fully onboard users. As a first time user, I find it difficult to understand some of the logics of the navigation and how grouping worked. So, I think that having short and well defined "introduction video hacks" can make onboarding in the tool enjoyable and capture more usage.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
Rare, but outages do happen
Read full review
Miro
I only give a 9/10 because of the speed at which it loads. I have never experienced issues with Miro logging me out early, or some other technical issue causing the program to crash, or even it just loading in perpetuity without ever actually coming up (unlike other programs such as SFDC). It take a minute for all of my boards to come up after I click on it in my favorites, but besides that, it's all good.
Read full review
Performance
Microsoft
Sometimes about once a week I get a message that says "Sorry, there seems to be something wrong". But it goes away in a few minutes.
Read full review
Miro
Sometimes it gets quite slow and there is a correlation between this and the size of the board. Hence we are trying to segment the boards based on product stages or projects so that the size doesn't go big. When you go from discovery to delivery on a simple board, it will get large and difficult to load, even crash or go white screen
Read full review
Support Rating
Microsoft
The overall support provided by Microsoft for Microsoft Teams has been quite good but there is still some room for improvements. Microsoft needs to proactively work on fixing the open bugs in order to provide a seamless experience to the users. But over the service and experience provided by the Microsoft team have been quite satisfactory.
Read full review
Miro
We have never reached out to or contacted support because Miro's platform has been incredibly intuitive and user-friendly. The comprehensive resources available, such as tutorials, documentation, and community forums, have provided all the guidance we needed. The seamless integration with our existing tools and the reliability of the platform have ensured that we rarely encounter issues that require external assistance. This self-sufficiency has allowed us to focus more on our projects and collaboration without interruptions. Overall, our experience with Miro has been smooth and efficient, eliminating the need for additional support
Read full review
Online Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Miro
There was a series of webinars which Miro hosted with our organization that went over the basics, then progressively became more advanced with additional sections. The instructors were knowledgeable, and provided examples throughout the sessions, as well as answered peoples' questions. There was ample time and experience on the calls to cover a range of topics. The instructors were also very friendly and sociable, as well as honest. Of course Miro isn't a "God-tool" that does absolutely everything, but the instructors were aware and emphasized the strengths where Miro had them and sincerely accepted feedback.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
I find everything I need for my day-to-day work.
Read full review
Miro
Easy to learn, Miro has a series of videos on YouTube that effectively taught this program to my team members and me. The program is drag-and-drop and works excellently. People pick up on how to use it efficiently, and it's great for organizing ideas more freely. This product is more challenging for some older audiences who are not accustomed to using a touchpad, but for most, it was very easy to use.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
Microsoft Teams offers a much more integrated experience between their chat and video call function compared to Google Chat and Slack. Both other tools are much better for internal communications are they have simpler UI without other features. Whereas Microsoft Teams can be used for more critical conversations, particularly between external companies, and has been very useful in sales conversations which is what we chose it for when speaking to companies that work exclusively through Microsoft.
Read full review
Miro
I’ve used both Excalidraw+ and draw.io. Excalidraw+ is great for quick, lightweight sketches with a clean “hand-drawn” feel, but it’s less strong for running structured workshops at scale (facilitation tools, templates, board organization, stakeholder-friendly presentation). draw.io is solid for precise diagramming (flows, architecture), but collaboration and workshop mechanics feel more “diagram-first” than “team-first.” We chose Miro because it combines strong real-time + async collaboration with facilitation features (voting, timer, stickies), easy board structuring with frames, and presentation mode—so we can go from messy ideation to a shareable narrative without switching tools.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Microsoft
Honestly, this tool is worth every penny. Yes, it's not free and you pay for the quality of services and the license. But the ROI and the benefits are all there. Also, the renewal, negotiation, and contract terms are all very well explained by our Microsoft account manager, and she's a charm.
Read full review
Miro
No answers on this topic
Scalability
Microsoft
It does not appear to have a limit to how many teams and employees we can have using it
Read full review
Miro
Maybe is possible now so... Could be useful to manage in some way source code for the projects? not to edit so when we make solutions with different components in MIro, maybe each component could redirect to the source code of this component
Read full review
Professional Services
Microsoft
I used Skype for Business to take calls, hold conferences, and provide remote assistance to users. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, is superior to Skype for Business in my opinion. My job entails a lot of screen sharing.
Read full review
Miro
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Because our unit decided to go all in with Microsoft Products, the integration and flow of our communication and files are seamless.
  • Microsoft Teams is very secure. Only those who are logged in with their university credentials can access the files we share and the events we host. Therefore, we don't have to worry about privacy and security for the virtual events we host.
  • If our virtual events are open to the public, joiners outside the organization often struggle to join because Microsoft Teams is not the most familiar tool amongst the public.
Read full review
Miro
  • Offer infinite canvas that allow me to brainstorm, organize ideas and think visually.
  • Effective for creating prototypes and wireframes, which saves time, reduces back-and-forth, and prevents costly mistakes.
  • Features like mind mapping, kanban boards, and flowcharts help me to visualize complex projects easily.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Miro Screenshots

Screenshot of Miro's design sprint templates, used to solve big challenges, create new products or improve existing ones.Screenshot of the Sprint Planning features in Miro, that assists Development Teams in creating a transparent understanding of what can be built and how. Users can run sprints and turn a team into creative and active participants. Today, many organizations use Agile tools to manage software development and other non-IT projects.Screenshot of the PI Planning Template that brings teams toward one vision of what stories to develop. Used to manage a backlog, increase productivity, and build the foundation for a successful PI Planning event. Miro’s PI Planning Template helps to get an overview of any PI Planning event, with step-by-step frames to guide the process.Screenshot of diagrams, concept maps, and system mapping templates used to communicate complex flows and create a shared understanding. Users can check off all the essential steps of the diagramming process and gain a complete overview of operations with Miro's diagramming templates collection.