TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about Miro

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

Miro

Connect with Miro

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with Miro so that Miro and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Microsoft Teams

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Teams combines video conferencing software with team collaboration tools. The communications platform allows MS Office users to conduct conference calls and share files via SharePoint, and join or initiate a group chat.

    $4.80

    per month per user

    Miro

    Score9 out of 10
    N/AMiro is a web-based Collaborative Whiteboard platform that provides teams with an infinite digital canvas for visual planning, diagramming, and workflow mapping. The platform integrates a spatial user interface with automated drawing tools and natural-language processing (NLP) to structure freeform ideas into defined project workflows and database schemas.

    $10

    per month per user

    Pricing
    Microsoft TeamsMiro
    Editions & Modules
    Microsoft Teams Essentials
    $4.80
    per month per user
    Microsoft Teams Enterprise
    $5.25
    per month (paid yearly) per user
    Microsoft Teams Enterprise
    $5.25
    per month per user
    Microsoft 365 Business Basic
    $7.20
    per month per user
    Microsoft 365 Business Standard
    $15
    per month per user
    1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
    $0
    2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
    $8
    per month (billed annually) per user
    3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
    $16
    per month (billed annually) per user
    4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
    contact sales
    annual billing per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Microsoft TeamsMiro
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional DetailsDiscounts are available for non profit organizations.Monthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Microsoft TeamsMiro
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    Microsoft Teams is a complementary tool I used in my software panel. So it can cover many cases where partners are not using the same tools as the ones used in my firm. It is a complementary tool with other ones like Miro, Slack, and Jira, for example, in order to facilitate …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    With Microsoft Teams you can better check each one's agenda. The background when in a meeting is better. Microsoft Teams also have more options for integrations in place.
    It's also easier and more intuitive.
    It also offers more options of communicating and not only video …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    Teams is the best of the company message tools that I have used so far because it integrates so many functionalities. Teams goes way beyond the instant messaging or video calls features with screen-sharing. It integrated with your calendar, enables you to do task tracking (e.g. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    User experience is of a higher level and integrates well into Outlook. Using the tool to facilitate user testing with participants outside the company is a breeze too.
    Incentivized
    Chose Microsoft Teams
    Moving to Microsoft Teams from IBM Sametime chat services provided Intact a great ahead into the productivity and response times for both internal and external customers/brokers. Sametime doesn't have the capability to make voice calls from either a desktop or a mobile app …
    Incentivized
    Miro
    Chose Miro
    Mural is close in capability but was used at a previous company. Miro had first-mover advantage.
    Microsoft Teams has its own Whiteboard app which does get usage within the company by several people because it's cost is included in the company's Microsoft Teams subscription. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro offers greater versatility and scalability than Mural and FigJam for cross-functional use. FigJam primarily serves design teams, while Mural focuses on structured workshops, and Miro supports a much broader array of use cases, including strategy, marketing, client …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Its so easy and fast to use.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    The main thing is having everything centralized in a single tool. We can have on board for retros and keep our previous one documented, we can have a board for one particular project and all diagrams related to it organized, all while using one single tool and one single …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Has lost of versatile templates and excellent tools for visual collaboration .
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    I tried other tools like Mural and FigJam before using Miro. FigJam was easy to understand, but it felt too simple for the kind of big projects my team works on. Mural was fine, but it did not have enough features to handle complex work or large teams. Miro worked much better …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    The all in one tool aspect is hard to beat. None of the others are really able to cover Agile Methodologies, Technical diagramming and Workshop Facilitation and Presentations in the one tool.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro has been nice to use because there are fewer limitations allowing for more creativity and unrestricted freedom. It's also a nice touch to have a large variety of templates to choose from. However, Miro does have a bit more of a learning curve as most things that are more …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    lucidspark is doing great but still delivers a disjointed experience (some features in Lucid Chats, others in Lucid Spark) - They do a better job providing pages inside the document - also more flexibility with customization

    FigJam is deeply integrated to Figma, so brings some …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    I have used Slack, jira, and draw.io before. Slack is great for quick communication and Jira helps track tasks, but Miro stands out for its visual thingy.
    Unlike draw.io, Miro is more flexible and interactive also has better and flexible sticky or frames, allowing teams to …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    The main alternative we run into is Microsoft Whiteboard, served via teams. While it is functional, the experience is lacking against Miro.

    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro is superior to these tools, but it is also significantly expensive.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro has always been my goat. I have been using it since it came out and I don't think I could ever choose any of the other ones. It's so much better to see the other people work simultaneously as you and communicating with them and copy and pasting in and out of each other's …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    It has a whiteboard app, but it lacks the functionality that Miro offers. I wish there were a microdot task integration. I like that I can tag myself or others in Microsoft products (i.e., PowerPoint, Word, Excel, etc.) and it will populate in my to-do list.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    I haven't used MindMap but I do know the product; I think Miro is just much easier to use and to share it with other colleagues.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    We ran a business case analysis for these, and they didn't come close. Visual omnipresent collaboration is a must; list of different features is way longer in Miro; Kanban and its views is less clunky and requires less fiddling out of the box — Trello needed to be set up …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    I was a while ago that I use Mural. At that stage the features where similar. However, Miro has developed at a very quick pace and is always adding features to improve the product, so I have had no reason to look elsewhere.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    I used a bit Microsoft Whiteboard some years ago, but at this time it was far behind Miro
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Miro basically cover the needs of all the other tools. I started using Miro extensively during the pandemic and at that point only Jamboard provided similar options and was free when collaborating in a bigger group and when not everyone had a license. This is still the main …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Google Jam Board but didn't like it cause no endless canvases..
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Jira is actively used in conjunction with Miro to track activities, and it offers functionalities that differ from Miro. However, it is much easier to create tables and diagrams in Miro. The advantage of Jira is that it enables the management of digital projects more …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    Very similar. Both whiteboards are easy to use and comparable.
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    It's challenging to describe how Miro stacks up against every other product listed above. Some are more relevant at different stages of the design realisation journey, some are more hyperfocused to certain usecases.

    Trello for example; I found myself creating Kanban boards in …
    Incentivized
    Chose Miro
    It excels in intuitive operation, has a wealth of tools and templates, and is equipped with AI features, making its behavior feel natural. I have only used Microsoft Whiteboard for comparison, and it lacked all of these features.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    90%
    Would buy again
    255 Answers
    97%
    Would buy again
    6225 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    95%
    Delivers good value for the price
    225 Answers
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    4124 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    90%
    Happy with the feature set
    255 Answers
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    6267 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    92%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    144 Answers
    98%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    2542 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    93%
    Implementation went as expected
    174 Answers
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    2721 Answers
    Features
    Microsoft TeamsMiro
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of Microsoft Teams and Miro
    Feature
    Microsoft Teams
    8.2
    241 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Miro
    -
    Ratings
    Task Management8.1179 Ratings00 Ratings
    Gantt Charts8.196 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scheduling8.3208 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workflow Automation8.5126 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Access8.2229 Ratings00 Ratings
    Search7.7212 Ratings00 Ratings
    Visual planning tools8.5143 Ratings00 Ratings
    Communication
    Comparison of Communication features of Microsoft Teams and Miro
    Feature
    Microsoft Teams
    8.0
    251 Ratings
    1% above category average
    Miro
    -
    Ratings
    Chat9.0250 Ratings00 Ratings
    Notifications8.5249 Ratings00 Ratings
    Discussions8.7235 Ratings00 Ratings
    Surveys8.2146 Ratings00 Ratings
    Internal knowledgebase8.6157 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with GoToMeeting6.547 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts5.743 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with Outlook9.1155 Ratings00 Ratings
    File Sharing & Management
    Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Microsoft Teams and Miro
    Feature
    Microsoft Teams
    8.2
    236 Ratings
    2% above category average
    Miro
    -
    Ratings
    Versioning8.6168 Ratings00 Ratings
    Video files8.4202 Ratings00 Ratings
    Audio files8.8200 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document collaboration8.9216 Ratings00 Ratings
    Access control8.6198 Ratings00 Ratings
    Advanced security features8.5158 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrates with Google Drive5.353 Ratings00 Ratings
    Device sync8.6172 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Microsoft TeamsMiro
    Small Businesses
    Flock
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
    Score9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Troop Messenger
    Score9.8 out of 10
    Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
    Score9 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Cisco Business Edition 7000 (discontinued)
    Score9 out of 10
    Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Microsoft TeamsMiro
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.7
    (329 ratings)
    8.9
    (6414 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.0
    (12 ratings)
    9.2
    (199 ratings)
    Usability
    8.7
    (114 ratings)
    8.5
    (795 ratings)
    Availability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.7
    (24 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.6
    (24 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (114 ratings)
    7.0
    (71 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.1
    (4 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.6
    (11 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.9
    (3660 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.6
    (19 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    6.3
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (4001 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.8
    (24 ratings)
    Professional Services
    7.0
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.9
    (12 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.2
    (13 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Microsoft TeamsMiro
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    It's amazing as a daily driver for team communication, and document search/store. Also, if you're doing a lot of LONG meetings and have trouble remembering details, the AI summarization is amazing and convenient. It just works. I'm not saying I always do this, of course, but if I need to 'skim' instead of really digging into every detail from a meeting, the AI-generated summary is generally good enough that I can get away with it.
    Read full review
    Miro
    We work on a lot of materials across different media. Sketches could be on real paper and later scanned, or on iPad and photoshops. Prototypes could be digital CAD models or 3D-printed models and later captured with cameras. Renderings be in another programs. So having Miro as whiteboard and being able to put all kind of materials (in forms of pictures or links) in one place and arrange them in a structural way is a huge productivity advantage for us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • All in one communication for Teams.
    • High quality and reliable both audio and video meetings.
    • Well organized and clear instant chat.
    • Excellent security features.
    • Beautiful integration with 3rd party tools and systems.
    • Perfect compatibility with windows ,android and iOS.
    • Allow meetings recordings for later us or sharing with teams that missed the live.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    • Makes internal coordination between admin team and tutors extremely painless. It's like a single place where everyone can drop ideas, get updates and notes without loss of context which usually happens in long email threads.
    • Versioning and board history are handled very well, which drastically reduces the workload. They help me track how a policy or math guideline has evolved, and also make it easy to revert changes if something doesn't work.
    • Comments stick exactly where they are meant to, making internal reviews much clearer. Admins don't have to guess which note refers to which rule or section.
    • Exports are clean, so even non-Miro teammates get it instantly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • The webinars feature has some missing functionally such as the ability for all users to use the Q&A feature (only those with a Microsoft Teams account can use it now), the ability to upload documents for attendees to easily access and download, and the ability for presenters and organizers to easily chat amongst themselves throughout the webinar.
    • The "Channels" organization hierarchy could be more clear. If you have several channels set up, it can get clunky and hard to find the specific channel you are looking for.
    • The MS Planner tool lacks functionality and organization. You cannot assign more than one person to a task and it's confusing when you try to share tasks with people - it would be nice if they were automatically added to someone's calendar.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    • Sometimes locating information on a bigger board is quite difficult as the information starts to look less sorted. So there can be a little bit of improvement in terms of bigger boards
    • Complex features are hard to navigate and implement without a proper hand. A little bit of intuitivity can help fix that, especially for beginners
    • In my opinion, a few more formatting tools for a legal workflow would really be a great add on
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Teams is included with our Office 365 subscription and we have no intention of migrating off of Office 365 and Microsoft products. Since Microsoft Teams is included for free with our Office 365 subscription, and since we enjoy all the features, benefits, and functionality, there is no question that our team will continue to use the product
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    Miro saves my day. I would spend at least 4x more time on documenting my projects and work without this tool. It support my day to day role and helps me be successful while saving my capacity. It is not only very easy to start working on it without additional training required, but also adapts to any use case that I might need to implement
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    If you have the full Microsoft Office suite, it works really well because it's integrated well within its ecosystem, but if not, it can be annoying because it tries to open a shared file in the web versions of the file equivalents. The web version is also a bit slow, and the login is very difficult to handle if you have multiple Microsoft or Outlook accounts.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    What elevates usability for me is how easily the software keeps everyone on the same page during the live session. When a team member is explaining a complex diagram, I can simply click on their avatar to instantly track their cursor and see the exact same perspective they are looking at, which is awesome.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Microsoft
    Rare, but outages do happen
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    I have not encountered events where Miro is not available. It is quite nice and reliable to be fair, even on my freemium version (startup) I don't have reliability issues. It does have sometimes where the screen refresh or "freezes" or "consumes a lot of data" and we have to rewind windows and the likes, this instances are very less
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Microsoft
    Sometimes about once a week I get a message that says "Sorry, there seems to be something wrong". But it goes away in a few minutes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    I took the loading quickly to be related to availability which I commented on before, so ditto with those comment on load time here. Although to reemphasize, Miro doesn't crash or just refuse to load like some other programs. The weak point of Miro for me is integration of files like Word, Excel, or PowerPoint (especially the later two). When you embed these, it gets slow, and complicated to bring them up while you're in the application.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    The overall support provided by Microsoft for Microsoft Teams has been quite good but there is still some room for improvements. Microsoft needs to proactively work on fixing the open bugs in order to provide a seamless experience to the users. But over the service and experience provided by the Microsoft team have been quite satisfactory.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    We have never reached out to or contacted support because Miro's platform has been incredibly intuitive and user-friendly. The comprehensive resources available, such as tutorials, documentation, and community forums, have provided all the guidance we needed. The seamless integration with our existing tools and the reliability of the platform have ensured that we rarely encounter issues that require external assistance. This self-sufficiency has allowed us to focus more on our projects and collaboration without interruptions. Overall, our experience with Miro has been smooth and efficient, eliminating the need for additional support
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Miro
    There was a series of webinars which Miro hosted with our organization that went over the basics, then progressively became more advanced with additional sections. The instructors were knowledgeable, and provided examples throughout the sessions, as well as answered peoples' questions. There was ample time and experience on the calls to cover a range of topics. The instructors were also very friendly and sociable, as well as honest. Of course Miro isn't a "God-tool" that does absolutely everything, but the instructors were aware and emphasized the strengths where Miro had them and sincerely accepted feedback.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Microsoft
    I find everything I need for my day-to-day work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    Easy to learn, Miro has a series of videos on YouTube that effectively taught this program to my team members and me. The program is drag-and-drop and works excellently. People pick up on how to use it efficiently, and it's great for organizing ideas more freely. This product is more challenging for some older audiences who are not accustomed to using a touchpad, but for most, it was very easy to use.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Teams offers a much more integrated experience between their chat and video call function compared to Google Chat and Slack. Both other tools are much better for internal communications are they have simpler UI without other features. Whereas Microsoft Teams can be used for more critical conversations, particularly between external companies, and has been very useful in sales conversations which is what we chose it for when speaking to companies that work exclusively through Microsoft.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    I like that Miro is something that anyone from any department can pick up, use and understand. You do not need specific domain knowledge. Miro has clean UI so running complex exercises becomes easier and can be easily shared across tools/platforms. Managing large number of participants on Miro is easier. FigJam on the other side is simpler and suits the needs of quick and simple brainstorm
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Microsoft
    Honestly, this tool is worth every penny. Yes, it's not free and you pay for the quality of services and the license. But the ROI and the benefits are all there. Also, the renewal, negotiation, and contract terms are all very well explained by our Microsoft account manager, and she's a charm.
    Read full review
    Miro
    No answers on this topic
    Scalability
    Microsoft
    It does not appear to have a limit to how many teams and employees we can have using it
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    Maybe is possible now so... Could be useful to manage in some way source code for the projects? not to edit so when we make solutions with different components in MIro, maybe each component could redirect to the source code of this component
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Professional Services
    Microsoft
    I used Skype for Business to take calls, hold conferences, and provide remote assistance to users. Microsoft Teams, on the other hand, is superior to Skype for Business in my opinion. My job entails a lot of screen sharing.
    Read full review
    Miro
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • Personally, I would say that by using Microsoft Teams, it upped my collaboration with my colleagues by around 50% or around more than half of what I usually did prior to using it.
    • I had 100% show rate and attendance on all of my meetings in the past 6 months.
    • If I may add, I also have been chattier & collaborative towards my colleagues in past 3 months particularly the month of December when we had huge traffic at work. I would estimate this behavior to have been increased by around 60% than what I usually incur during normal operating days.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Miro
    • Miro has helped increase productivity within teams because all the brainstorming, planning, and collaborative tasks can now be done within one tool.
    • Conversations about projects and decision-making processes are now quicker, allowing teams to plan and document their work much faster.
    • Working remotely has become much better because everyone can collaborate through Miro, eliminating communication gaps.
    • It has become easier to create documentation and follow up on meetings, saving time during the process.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Miro Screenshots

    Screenshot of Miro's design sprint templates, used to solve big challenges, create new products or improve existing ones.Screenshot of the Sprint Planning features in Miro, that assists Development Teams in creating a transparent understanding of what can be built and how. Users can run sprints and turn a team into creative and active participants. Today, many organizations use Agile tools to manage software development and other non-IT projects.Screenshot of the PI Planning Template that brings teams toward one vision of what stories to develop. Used to manage a backlog, increase productivity, and build the foundation for a successful PI Planning event. Miro’s PI Planning Template helps to get an overview of any PI Planning event, with step-by-step frames to guide the process.Screenshot of diagrams, concept maps, and system mapping templates used to communicate complex flows and create a shared understanding. Users can check off all the essential steps of the diagramming process and gain a complete overview of operations with Miro's diagramming templates collection.