Ahrefs vs. Conductor

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Ahrefs
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Ahrefs is an SEO tool providers. Ahrefs Site Explorer provides a suite of tools including a component for backlink & on-page SEO analysis, online brand mentions tracking, and domain comparison tool for competitor analysis, etc. They refer to themselves as “the largest index of live backlinks.”
$99
per month
Conductor
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Conductor is a Website Optimization and Intelligence platform. Conductor’s platform is designed to help brands maximize organic search visibility and turn it into revenue, create and optimize content that gets found and converts, and protect performance with 24/7 website monitoring and alerting. Conductor provides prioritized, actionable insights across SEO, content, and technical health, empowering cross-functional teams with a central source of truth to transform their website…N/A
Pricing
AhrefsConductor
Editions & Modules
Lite
$99.00
per month
Standard
$179.00
per month
Advanced
$399.00
per month
Agency
$999.00
per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AhrefsConductor
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AhrefsConductor
Considered Both Products
Ahrefs
Chose Ahrefs
Ahrefs and SpyFu compliment each other. Ahrefs is better for backlinks and overall performance tracking. SpyFu is the leader for keyword analysis, especially with their combat tool. Conductor strives to replace or supplement Webmaster Tools and Google Analytics and build custom …
Chose Ahrefs
It's competitive with Semrush, Moz and other tools of that same ilk. It's great for serious SEO work - not at the Enterprise level - but at the small business, small agency level. I would not consider it competitive with BrightEdge, Conductor, SEOClarity, etc. - but it IS …
Chose Ahrefs
It's very clear that Ahrefs has a larger database than their competitors. I never run into issues where this tool isn't able to evaluate keywords - even if they are very long tail niche keywords.

The link section of the tool is also very useful. Ahrefs is able to clean up the …
Chose Ahrefs
Ahrefs is the best tool I've used for link building reporting; however, other tools are better suited for things like keyword position tracking, keyword research, etc.
Conductor
Chose Conductor
I have evaluated Ahrefs & BrightEdge and found them lacking in the information that Conductor can provide me as far as content development and keyword research. I currently use Semrush, but will not be renewing for the year since most, if not all, of the services provided by Sem…
Chose Conductor
Some of the main tools we have evaluated in addition and/or in lieu of Conductor include Semrush, for its keyword and content features, Ahrefs for its backlinking features, and ContentKing for its content performance and insight features. [I believe] using tools like Ahrefs
Chose Conductor
I have used many SEO campaign platforms like Conductor. Conductor UX leads to a good SEO workflow for me. I don't really even understand why. I have used Semrush a lot, Ahrefs an awful lot, and BrightEdge a little, and I love doing SEO analysis in Conductor and spend way more …
Chose Conductor
I have been in SEO for over a decade, and in that time, I have used just about every tool on the market. Conductor is the tool we get the most useful insights from in the easiest way. The support and help we get from the Conductor team are one of the main reasons we ignore the …
Chose Conductor
We didn't use another product previously, we used an agency that did everything for us, so bringing Organic SEO in-house was why we went with Conductor. I have used other products in other roles and at other companies and each has its strengths. Conductor is good for large …
Chose Conductor
We moved to Conductor because the functionality matched what we were looking for. Price was not as much of a factor, thankfully, because Conductor is expensive.
Chose Conductor
We switched from BrightEdge mainly due to my recommendation based on my past experience with Conductor. The main reason was the advancements in technology that Conductor had demonstrated during our initial conversations. We were certain that the tool simply had more to offer …
Chose Conductor
We switched to Conductor for several reasons: Explorer is a feature that other tools do not have. It is very helpful to be able to see how your website is working as a whole vs. just the keywords you are tracking. Content research was something that was missing from our …
Chose Conductor
Used many platforms and tools over the years, current company had a contract with Conductor when I came onboard so was able to use it now.
Chose Conductor
BrightEdge was the tool we had. We felt that Conductor, however, was a much better fit for our internal needs, and spreading the best SEO practice to employees and sub-teams.
Chose Conductor
I have used BrightEdge in the past and it was quite complicated to understand how to we leverage it to get things done and see the impact from that. The high knowledgable experts Conductor has made the life of our SEO team much easier.
Chose Conductor
We've evaluated multiple enterprise and SMB platforms in ecommerce and multi-location SEO. We switched from a very similar platform for the improvement in the quality and design of the reports our clients enjoy seeing, not realizing it was also chocked full of other tools like …
Chose Conductor
I wasn't the decision maker. I used BrightEdge in my previous company and overall is very similar to Conductor in terms of functionalities, but the customer support of Conductor is much more helpful.
Chose Conductor
We used multiple platforms for SEO and content marketing in the past, Conductor substituted some of the but not all. We still have to use 3rd party platforms for backlink reasearch.
Chose Conductor
I liked seoClarity better, but Conductor accomplishes what we need it to do!
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
AhrefsConductor
SEO
Comparison of SEO features of Product A and Product B
Ahrefs
7.8
71 Ratings
0% above category average
Conductor
8.5
261 Ratings
9% above category average
Keyword analysis9.468 Ratings9.0260 Ratings
Backlink management8.869 Ratings7.994 Ratings
SERP ranking tracking9.167 Ratings9.1245 Ratings
Page grader6.061 Ratings8.5115 Ratings
Competitive analysis9.169 Ratings7.9258 Ratings
Site audit / diagnostics7.264 Ratings9.0232 Ratings
Site recommendations5.360 Ratings8.7246 Ratings
Task management7.232 Ratings8.096 Ratings
SEO Channels
Comparison of SEO Channels features of Product A and Product B
Ahrefs
7.7
62 Ratings
1% above category average
Conductor
8.3
234 Ratings
9% above category average
Local SEO7.650 Ratings9.1190 Ratings
Social SEO6.847 Ratings5.530 Ratings
Mobile SEO7.146 Ratings9.7210 Ratings
Global SEO9.356 Ratings8.9195 Ratings
SEO Platform & Account Management
Comparison of SEO Platform & Account Management features of Product A and Product B
Ahrefs
8.6
59 Ratings
2% above category average
Conductor
9.3
247 Ratings
10% above category average
Multi-domain support8.956 Ratings9.4218 Ratings
Integration with web analytics tools8.429 Ratings9.1232 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AhrefsConductor
Small Businesses
Nozzle
Nozzle
Score 10.0 out of 10
Nozzle
Nozzle
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Advanced Web Ranking
Advanced Web Ranking
Score 8.2 out of 10
Advanced Web Ranking
Advanced Web Ranking
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Dupli Checker (DupliChecker.com)
Dupli Checker (DupliChecker.com)
Score 8.6 out of 10
Dupli Checker (DupliChecker.com)
Dupli Checker (DupliChecker.com)
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AhrefsConductor
Likelihood to Recommend
9.3
(76 ratings)
9.0
(262 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(5 ratings)
8.9
(14 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(4 ratings)
6.6
(149 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
8.8
(14 ratings)
9.0
(223 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
3.8
(7 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.6
(2 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
AhrefsConductor
Likelihood to Recommend
Ahrefs
Ahrefs is a must have in the SEO toolbox. It is one of the leading tools in the industry for serious SEO research. It can do almost everything you need on the non-technical side of SEO. In my opinion, it is not great if you need a detailed technical tool that identifies errors and helps with fix suggestions. In that instance, I think there are better tools on the market. But - for content and keyword related tasks, I think it's must have.
Read full review
Conductor
Conductor is irreplaceable for enterprise rank tracking across multiple regional sites. Conductor's blend of keyword and competitor tracking is perfect for keyword research in my industry. Conductor allows me to collect and report on our web content in any grouping and isolate it for performance.
Read full review
Pros
Ahrefs
  • I have been using this platform in my organization to develop several SEO tools to help to grow our website much.
  • It has all the main features which include competitor research, keyword research, website audit, content research, and rank tracking.
  • I have been using all these functions in the organization for several purposes. It provides complete information and complete performance details of the SEO.
  • It provides us the detailed keyword research with volume, CPC, and other information.
Read full review
Conductor
  • When I need to quickly determine what Google features our keywords are ranking for: Featured Snippets, Carousels, Rich Snippets, Sitelinks, PAA boxes, etc.
  • The ability to create highly customizable dashboards that provide a one-page view of insights for the specific web properties you are tracking.
  • A content guidance tool that is unmatched by any other product available in the market.
Read full review
Cons
Ahrefs
  • Can't export graphs: some graphs within the tool would be useful as an export. Unfortunately, exporting them is not an option.
  • No "blanket" reporting options: though Ahrefs is excellent for gathering and exporting intel/data, there are no blanket SEO reports provided. Exporting data is great, but simple report exporting would make it better.
Read full review
Conductor
  • Backlink tracking/reporting (would like to see backlinks more easily and maybe backlink opportunities if possible)
  • Custom content briefs (right now I move the brief from the platform version into our own in-house Word doc template because it is more detailed. Would love to be able to customize the brief that is set up within Conductor so that we can do it all in one place.)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Ahrefs
Their index is too vast to ignore when looking at a complete backlink profile. We find links in Ahrefs that do not appear in any other link detection tool. For this reason, it's a must for our agency to use for the foreseeable future. Plus, it's very affordable considering the data you get
Read full review
Conductor
Conductor has the right amount of tools for our usage. The support is also really good so we get help when we need it. The tool is well priced for the amount of functionality you get. There is plenty more I could say here but I'll keep it short and sweet.
Read full review
Usability
Ahrefs
Ahrefs is very easy to use - you can jump right in and understand most of the assets. Overall, the dashboard snapshots give a very good picture of inbound link activity. For deeper analysis of historical trends, the system can become cumbersome, making it hard to do full work without exporting and reformatting the data.
Read full review
Conductor
I check features like the InsightStream every Monday to monitor any major losses or gains in performance. These are easily digested and save me tons of time searching for these insights manually. If there's anything "worth calling home about" I can easily add insights into a workspace and create a report to communicate these results. It's super easy to use Conductor with a team and across departments.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Ahrefs
No answers on this topic
Conductor
Always works when I've needed it
Read full review
Performance
Ahrefs
No answers on this topic
Conductor
Sometimes reports can take some time to load
Read full review
Support Rating
Ahrefs
Ahrefs has always been responsive when there's been a technical issue with the site. There are usually very little problems, but if there are, they announce it on their social media accounts which keeps its customers informed. Email support is prompt and the customer service people are very helpful, knowledgable and friendly.
Read full review
Conductor
It's been sort of off and on in the 2 years I've used it. The live chat has been really helpful many times, and they're quick to respond. We had different support contacts but they've all been good. I think they've recently changed the way they provide support that I believe will be more dedicated and hands-on
Read full review
In-Person Training
Ahrefs
No answers on this topic
Conductor
Our in house SEO manager trained everyone. It was easy to learn and he was well versed with the product. Any questions we had he was able to answer or reach out to support to find the answer
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Ahrefs
No answers on this topic
Conductor
I definitely recommend their professional services for getting started. It got our account 90% of the way to where we needed to be in order to gain value from it. In fact, I'd suggest that with few exceptions (such as, you have a staff that is already familiar with the platform and doesn't need any help), the quick start services over the first 30-90 days should be a standard part of onboarding with any new client. It definitely got us to the point of gaining ROI from the solution and, in turn, will make it easier to justify renewal and continued investment in it.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Ahrefs
Majestic and Ahrefs are really close in terms of tool. Ahrefs does offer competitive comparison and they do have a more up to date data base. Majestic however has a more comprehensive historical view of sites which is also extremely valuable. Majestic also offers a link velocity chart that is missing on Ahrefs. Ahrefs makes up for this with their links gained/lost calendar which Majestic is missing.
Read full review
Conductor
We have looked at a few other competitors or other SAAS options but none of them offered the number and quality of tools and resources that Conductor offered especially for the flexible pricing we found with Conductor
Read full review
Scalability
Ahrefs
No answers on this topic
Conductor
Many features
Read full review
Return on Investment
Ahrefs
  • Ahrefs Site Explorer has helped with any comprehensive backlink analysis and backlink profile management we've had.
  • Ahrefs Site Explorer has helped tremendously in getting manual penalties lifted for certain sites.
  • Aherfs Site Explorer has been helpful in identifying 404 error pages.
Read full review
Conductor
  • Conductor helped us aim at low hanging fruits for quick wins, which increased our traffic
  • With Conductor's tool, it was easy to look at general keywords where we were already ranking, but not good enough, and then focus around what we could do to increase our positioning
  • All this extra traffic, gave us more leads, therefore more sales!
Read full review
ScreenShots

Ahrefs Screenshots

Screenshot of Analyze backlinks and keywords of any website to find opportunities for your organic traffic growthScreenshot of Check your website for 100+ pre-defined SEO issuesScreenshot of Get relevant keyword ideas supported by accurate SEO metricsScreenshot of Find the most shared and linked-to content on any topicScreenshot of Track your and your competitors' search rankings

Conductor Screenshots

Screenshot of Keyword Rank Tracking:
Conductor's keyword reporting features provide an overview of important keywords, and access to the latest rank and MSV data. Viewers can track rankings over time and filter across multiple dimensions like location, device, search engine, result type, traffic and rank trends to gain actionable insights to address opportunities and stabilize performance.Screenshot of Performance Reporting:
Conductor provides a holistic view of content performance with integrated analytics (e.g., GA4, Adobe, custom), keyword visibility, Google Search Console data, and technical insights to identify the opportunities driving traffic and to measure organic marketing ROI. These analytics will connect team effort to impact with automated change detection, including content and metadata changes, custom events, and industry updates that may have affected performance.Screenshot of AI Content Workflow:
From researching high-converting topics with Conductor's keyword index to surfacing AI-powered content recommendations while writing, Conductor enables teams to create and optimize content faster and easier. The feature includes SEO guidance across everything from keyword insights and content attributes to page health, and offers AI-generated suggestions personalized to specific objectives, audience, and journey stage.Screenshot of Website Health Dashboard:
Conductor Website Monitoring helps protect and maximize performance at scale with 24/7 monitoring and real-time alerts with up-to-date site health and performance data across all websites in one command center. Automatic prioritization of issues by impact and unlimited customization across page segments, alerts, and issues make it easy to focus on the most relevant data needed for any specific growth goals.Screenshot of SEO Competitor Tracking: 
This produces a head-to-head comparison of any competitor's organic channel performance to survey top traffic-driving pages, identify what keywords they rank for, and see recent gains and losses. Viewers can search market share by category, result type, rank position, location, and device type to discover where a brand can win against its both direct and indirect competitors.Screenshot of Issues Management:
Customizable, real-time alerting used to catch and fix issues before traffic and revenue are impacted, including the ability to track any custom page element across a website to manage not only technical health but also content, product pages, brand standards, and legal compliance. It is used to support decisions, track progress, and check implementation with a full changelog of every website.