Adobe Experience Manager is a combined web content management system and digital asset management system. The combined applications of Adobe Experience Manager Sites and Adobe Experience Manager Assets is offered by the vendor as an end-to-end solution for managing and delivering marketing content.
N/A
Uberflip
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Uberflip is a content marketing platform from the Toronto company of the same name. Central to Uberflip is its content hub for aggregating, centralizing, organizing, and finally curating content for delivery to targeted audiences in streams, culminating in the call-to-action (CTA). Uberflip also contains analytics that show how effective these CTAs are (and in what context they are effective or not) so poor content can be confidently dropped in favor of what works.
For $200 monthly the user…
Adobe Experience Manager, built on Java, means that the pool of developers available to work on the platform is large. Adobe Experience Manager's front-ends and client library management tooling mean that front-end developers can feel at home despite a lack of Java knowledge.
We wanted a CMS which is known in market, which have a good ecosystem. With Adobe Experience Manager, we get integration with Target, Tag management, and other Adobe products.
Adobe Experience Manager provides way more. It is a much more holistic tool to help us manage the entire customer Journey. I, however, do not have enough power to make those decisions. I did not in fact choose Adobe Experience Manager, but I do like it better.
Adobe's integration with all of its other products requires digital marketing, making its system stand out from the rest. AI integration takes it to the next level.
I selected Adobe Experience Manager because it was the easiest to connect to our platforms, the best cost for the size of our company, and I was using Adobe for almost everything else at the time. I think this was the best solution for our smaller company at the time.
SnapApp is a sister company of Uberflip. We had great results (2500 leads created within the year) and allowed our Sales Team to overachieve on our revenue goals.
In my experience Uberflip measures up quite well to Seismic. It is easier to find the content you need in cotnent hubs and because of the interface. That makes it more useful. It is similarly easy to share content. Where Uberflip is weaker is backend link tracking viewing …
We were evaluating apples and oranges, really. At the time of our evaluation, Pathfactory was more of a system (called LookBookHQ at the time) to create individual landing pages. Content was not really centralized or reported on outside of the individual page created.
I think they have different perspectives and solutions, I think Uberflip is similar but different and use both to complement the strategy, there are things that they share and I choose which is the best from both in that specific area and used it. I love HubSpot and I think …
We preferred the vision for Uberflip and the team we worked with. It has an aggressive development roadmap and they roll out features quickly, including better integrations with our wider tech stack - including 6sense, salesforce, and Marketo,
I have not used an Uberflip alternative as I find Uberflip to be leading the pack. I've heard peers using PathFactory, but none of them seemed too impressed.
When it comes to asset management, Uberflip has a HubSpot beat. That doesn't mean HubSpot isn't necessary for other functions, but when it comes to the content itself, the backend organization, reporting (item and stream level), and delivery of the content is much more useful …
We looked at 6 different categories of these products. Below I outline how Uberflip stacked up against the other products.
Look N Feel: The Uberflip platform and front end hub look n feel scored higher than either of the other products. They had more template options, better …
Ceros is a completely different type of tool, and didn't have the full functionality we needed. Pathfactory was good but lacked some ABM features for customization. Overall, we chose Uberflip because of all the integrations and ABM functionality we were after. They also wow'ed …
Uberflip's strengths seem to be in the organization and delivery of content journeys, the measurement of content engagement and integration into a broader digital marketing strategy (SEO capabilities, embedding on pages, partnerships and integrations).
The WordPress site that we used before Uberflip was not intuitive, required developer time to maintain, and did not offer the same level of customization to the content types as Uberflip does. The connection with Pardot was not as smooth either.
Uberflip truly integrates with the website experience through the resources hub and streams, but also in main website pop-ups and embedded tiles. It also fully integrates with our Marketing Automation Platform so we get additional information and data.
Compared to Issuu, Uberflip has higher level content creation solutions and more integration of multi-media components for campaigns. Uberflip also allows everyone to build campaigns within the design itself.
Uberflip is a simpler solution and gets the job done. Yes, there are more bells and whistles with some of the enterprise level solutions, but they are going to be more costly and complex. Uberflip gives you what you need to get the job done for the most part.
The only competitor we looked at in comparison to Uberflip was Visually. From our perspective, Visually just didn't align with the content hub needs we were needing. We also had a more enjoyable sales process with Uberflip as they spent a lot of time customizing our demo …
I have not found another platform that provides all the functionality Uberflip does. Before Uberflip we cobbled together content on our website, in our marketing automation platform, internal share sites for sales and such to give us a fraction of what Uberflip can do.
At the time of purchase we looked a few different Content Management Systems but what really stood out with Uberflip was the competitive pricing and the outstanding Customer Support team. They were there with us through set up making it an easy transition over and the customer …
We selected Uberflip because it was integrated with HubSpot and provided a user experience similar to what we were developing on our website. Uberflip has also been very responsive since day 1 and gets our issues resolved quickly. We looked at doing more in-house or building it …
I was not involved in the initial selection of Uberflip and have not used competitive products. In the past I have dealt with home-grown web pages/sections that housed content and it was very painful.
I'll answer the second one because I mean, the first one I don't have an issue with. The second scenario is we oftentimes have the need to spin off very small campaign style sites or sites that generate leads but are unbranded and that sort of thing. So that's hard to do in AEM because you have to then create another organization within AEM to do that. And we're talking about sites that are maybe five to 10 pages in size. So we've been investigating Edge, but then that's a different workflow, so we'd have to train people on that. So it would be nice if there was something within the AEM structure that could allow you to do something very similar to Edge, where you make some small micro sites that are not necessarily branded, that you could still host within the platform and not have to retrain everybody on a completely different platform.
Uberflip is well suited to bring your larger organization into sharing content. Instead of relying only on marketing to be driving content, Uberflip has made it easy to integrate content into the sales process or client services process, with the ability to make the experience unique to sales or CS. Where Uberflip may not be as suited is if you are looking for landing pages to capture leads, most of the time for landing pages designed to sell a product you want to add specific feature copy and be able to place a gate over content without having a user jumping from page to page, while also having the gate capturing information and allowing you to trigger activities from your marketing automation system. Uberflip doesn't allow you to add copy or manipulate a landing page and only allows you to add information from a gate to a static list, which does not allow you to automate the process.
It allows us to scale so that we can make a change on a global footer. And it applies to all of the different property websites. It allows us to set up components and compartmentalize things in a way. The big thing is that it's scalable. And then it also ties into Adobe Analytics and other Adobe products. So we are a complete Adobe shop. Every Adobe product that we can use, we use. I don't think we do it for marketing so much, but for doing target testing and analytics, data scientists are using the same product and so it all speaks.
Sales Enablement - We can now have Sales pick and choose what content they want to send out to Clients/Prospects while having all of the data tracked on the back-end
Content Management - We can host all of our PDF content in Uberflip so it is easy to pull individually or into sales/marketing use cases
Client Relations - Our CSM and the entire Uberflip team has been incredibly helpful in getting us off the ground and helping us figure out how Uberflip fits in exactly with our use cases.
There are some glitches in permissions inheritance that require us to toggle a save on permissions in groups that inherit from a group that was recently updated.
Large packages require stopping the workflow launcher OSGi components or many workflows will slow down the server.
Locked pages are hard to find unless I use /siteadmin... I often hear that the CQ tools will go away, but if we lose that, some small things might be harder to do, like finding locked pages.
We had and still have a fantastic experience using Adobe CQ. Lots of flexibility, great integration with other Adobe products we already use and a powerful technology make it a great fit for our corporate environment. Also as the community grows, it makes it easier to network with other developers and users to get new ideas on how to continue to get the best out of the software.
This serves all of our content marketing needs, but our sales team does need a more robust sales enablement solution. It's hard to have the engagement/usage data for different kinds of content in disparate systems. But I've looked for years and been unable to find a one-size-fits-all solution to solve all marketing and sales enablement use cases.
Considering I'm completely self-taught on Adobe Experience Manager, I have to rate usability quite high since plenty of aspects were easy to figure out on my own. With its cloud-based platform, access from anywhere it super great for overall usability. Edits can also be made pretty quick and easy, which is another great feature.
For me this has been very easy to use. Once we got the basics down it was easily repeatable and if we did end up having questions our point of contact was very helpful and fast in getting our questions answered. If it was above their capabilities they brought in a support professional who really made it easy for us to learn and replicate their steps.
Being part of Adobe Suite means you are already notified when the tool has any outages. However, I have never faced unplanned outages. Whenever you face any issue with the site, it is clearly stated if there were any planned outages and how quickly you will be back to normal. So, I will say that even the outages are planned and managed in a great way like their other services.
With respect to performance, Adobe experience manager is one of the best in the CMS space. We didn't observe frequent slowness on platform, however the systems which are accessing experience manager should be of good specifications without which slowness would be observed. Adobe experience manager works well in integration with other solutions, unless the destination application is designed to trigger frequent calls to AEM.
Adobe Experience Manager, in all its capacity, is a great alternative to any other CMS you are using. It helps in rapid development and makes life easier for maintaining the website for multi-language sites. Technical know-how is eliminated at content authoring. Better documentation in terms of live examples with videos would be appreciated.
The support and the team at Uberflip is THE BEST!!! They are seriously so great. They got to know me on a personal level and really cared about getting my Hub set up the way I wanted and they want my Hub to be successful. They even took a few of us out to dinner when they were in my area for a marketing event. They are always there to help me and only a quick email or phone call away
It wasn't exactly training but there was a step by step check list of things in a project the Uberflip team shared with me. There were links to helpful articles on it that walked me through how to set things up
Depending on your individual needs, It is really quite simple to create an authoring experience for a website that looks really good. I have been part of many implementations and many teams and have seen many projects that were super successful and others that were not implemented well. AEM has room for a lot of flexibility in the implementation process compared to other CMS like SharePoint
The implementation team was with us every step of the way, helping us map what needed to be done, providing examples of other customers and being as hands-on as we needed
SSO is one fits all, so we don't have to have a separate SSO for each application of Adobe The integration with Analytics works perfectly and bring directly value really quickly Target remains more complicated to set up, but can also bring a lot of value once integrated with the rest of the Adobe platform The fact that the solution is Cloud services is also a big advantage for maintenance
When it comes to asset management, Uberflip has a HubSpot beat. That doesn't mean HubSpot isn't necessary for other functions, but when it comes to the content itself, the backend organization, reporting (item and stream level), and delivery of the content is much more useful in Uberflip. Otherwise, they have the same learning curve.