Act-On is an adaptive marketing platform designed to drive personal and purposeful multi-channel marketing. Its foci are inbound and outbound marketing, for enabling a tighter alignment with sales and turning data into actionable insights.
$900
per month (starts at 2,500 active contacts)
Constant Contact Lead Gen & CRM
Score 9.0 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Constant Contact Advanced Automation helps users to send the right message at the right time, from Social to SMS and email to ecommerce. Multi-Channel Campaigns - Create comprehensive marketing campaigns with just a few clicks. The Campaign Builder tool can help launch a multi-channel campaign across email, social, and SMS. Pre-Built Automation Templates - Setup your automations quickly with pre-built automation templates to…
$449
per month
Pricing
Act-On Software
Constant Contact Lead Gen & CRM
Editions & Modules
Professional
$900
per month (starts at 2,500 active contacts)
Enterprise
$2,000
per month ( starts at 2,500 active contacts)
Lite
$12
per month
Standard
$35
per month
Premium
$80
per month
Lead Gen & CRM
Starting at $449
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Act-On
Constant Contact Lead Gen & CRM
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
Required
Required
Additional Details
The Professional package starts at 2,500 active contacts, 3 marketing users, 50 sales users and 30,000 API calls per day. The Enterprise package starts at 2,500 active contacts, 6 marketing users, 100 sales users and 30,000 API calls per day. Annual contract required.
Act-On is easier to use than Marketo, but not as visually appealing and user-friendly as HubSpot. It's much better than Pardot, as Pardot feel clunky every step of the way. SharpSpring is comparable because of its price point but surpasses Act-On in its tools and intuitive …
Act-On has similar features as SharpSpring, but in my opinion, delivers better. While their customer service is not excellent, it is better than my experience with SharpSpring. As for MailChimp, Act-On has more robust features. But, it is also dramatically more challenging to …
Compared to SharpSpring, Act-On has it's act together. SharpSpring is obviously a value tool in comparison. Our major issue with SharpSpring was Salesforce integration; we constantly had issues with leads being re-uploaded, data changing or not changing when it was supposed to, …
We use multiple platforms for different clients. SharpSpring is great for clients that are new to the content marketing game and haven't had much of a business development / CRM tracking process in place while Act-On has a more robust platform with a larger suite of options. Str…
SharpSpring is the second best for looks and ease of use (HubSpot). But, the price tag is less than 1/3 of HubSpot, so it's a small sacrifice to make to get a tool that works as powerfully. It's more intuitive and easier to manage and build in than Marketo, Pardot and Act-On. …
Before using SharpSpring, we used Marketo internally. We started researching other companies when we wanted to start reselling it to clients. Marketo and Pardot's business model (at the time, may have changed) did not allow for that. Act-On and HubSpot did, but it was based on …
Act-On is a good tool but way too expensive in comparison to SharpSpring. Shaprspring offers all the features of Act-On at a fraction of the cost. Also, Act-On's customer support is no match for that of SharpSpring. We used Act-On for 3 years but they continued to increase …
HubSpot and Act-On have about the same capabilities. HubSpot has a much more expensive price model and Act-On is less expensive than HubSpot but even though more expensive. The user interface is not as clear as in SharpSpring and SharpSpring has a better integration with CRM. Ac…
SharpSpring provides all the functionality my clients and I need most at a fraction of the cost of leading competitors. It does so in a user-friendly application with excellent self-help tools and support.
We previously used the Act-On Software through a 3rd partymarketing company.The fact that SharpSpring does not require us to use a 3rd party marketing team due to ease of use as well as offer more options at a lower price made the decision to go with SharpSpring that much easier.
I find SharpSpring a lot more user-friendly than platforms like HubSpot or Act-On. I find HubSpot's interface very convoluted in places. I also feel as if HubSpot's email deliverability is not as good. Compared to the other platforms, SharpSpring's interface tends to just be a …
Better support team, no contracts, much less of a price, similar feature set (when I first subscribed--now it has LiveChat and retargeting and more that Act-On didn't have, features seem to be constantly added). Much nicer and intuitive interface. Built-in CRM that integrates …
We experienced working with other platforms in our team, reviewing and testing, in order to find the one that would optimize our workflows the most. Some of these were completely new to me (Sharpspring was one of them), but I had previous experiences with platforms like Mailchim…
At the end of the day, SharpSpring was cheaper, had better customer service, and a very easy interface with a huge range of capabilities. It also helps that they are always very receptive to our input for new features to add.
They are all good tools, but they are also more expensive than most clients can afford and more complex than almost any internal staff can absorb. The cost and usability of SharpSpring make them the first choice for every client we engage with and we don't show favorites. …
SharpSpring is the cost performance leader -- not by a mile, by light years. The same reliable marketing automation feature set you get anywhere else for a fraction of the cost. It is the definition of a marketing technology no-brainer. Other systems do have additional modules …
I tried several platforms before deciding on SharpShpring. Most are very good and get the job done. Some are more focused on users at the enterprise level. Others on the SMB marketing. The main difference for us is that we are an agency focused on the SMB market. The …
At first, we heavily researched Act-On, HubSpot, and Infusionsoft. Infusionsoft was fair, but not great in pricing or usability, it seems dated. HubSpot is great if you're learning how to do content marketing, but we already had that down for a few years and it required you to …
We looked at many MA firms, but Sharpspring works with marketing agencies almost exclusively, and really focuses on helping them sell and retain clients.