Adobe WorkfrontPricing

Cost reduction on maintaining internal tooling. Ease of use and maitainance. Easier

I'm a user under a large organization. I know it's not cheap to implement, I don't know how the price scales for a small-business, but I do like the product … scalable, It could be a bit more user-friendly for small business owners It's expensive - and rightfully so - but for a small biz to incorporate it's definitely … makes me valuable to my employer For me - as a subcontrac…

Mobile app UI experience. A bit expensive for small businesses.

[Adobe] Workfront had the scalability and insights that we needed. From a cost/value perspective it has proven itself but the initial evaluation was a team

resources into implementing and maintaining our instance. Other solutions (cheaper, simpler) would likely suit smaller companies better.

Workfront offers more features than lower cost options, allowing us to scale our business and not have to shift with each

who may be outside of the initial project scope Allows post project time/cost/benefit allowance for stakeholder reporting and future project manpower and … Microsoft issue though. Some navigation is a little bit convoluted. Enterprise pricing could be better compared to some alternative products. … departments, maybe not so great for one man bands a…

best software for small businesses or small teams. This software can be expensive, making it not a viable solution for businesses that are on a budget.

The learning curve is high. It's not the easiest program to use. Price :Things are good, but you are paying for all the extras whether you use them … bang for their buck using programs that are either free or have a lower price per user. Workfront is more "big league," used for mass communication of … Productivity has increased now that peop…

templates are necessary to what we do for our sales team. It may also be expensive to transition. The overarching concept of Workfront is daunting and hard

helps with time logging, Agile burndown, Kanban, worker following, and charging-- practically every part of our business. Likewise, all correspondence … added to their Product Roadmap or come to advertise. It's not the least expensive available, that is without a doubt. There is to some degree an expectation … the requirements of your clients. 3) The ann…

The product can be a little expensive for some organizations. For new employees the product can be more challenging

into tracking statuses and risk potential. Negative might be the upfront cost of each user and the access capabilities of each user aren't the greatest

solid enterprise solution and may not suit small companies mostly due to its cost. … Workfront is one of the most expensive tools in the market but it offers a lot as well. From budget management

The big value here is in the reporting. Being able to report volume of work, hours by task

partner in Workfront that is not purely tool based, but help us prove the value proposed to users and stakeholders... help us convince them that following … budget allows. It would effectively double our license count so its a bit cost prohibitive at this early stage in our Workfront relationship (we launched … partner in Workfront that is not purely tool b…

organisations and complex business processes Performance Reporting on historical values

for the mid-size business. I am not sure what their enterprise business pricing is, however, I imagine the ROI is well worth it as many corporations I have

having them stored with various agencies. We wanted to reduce risk and reduce cost. … having them stored with various agencies. We wanted to reduce risk and reduce cost. … risk of not knowing where a certain asset is stored No more file retrieval fees Everything located…

in parallel project Resource time sheet can help a lot to manage project cost, project statistics, and future scenarios

would be nice to see ROI and financial aspects beyond just reporting hourly cost and hours. Many people on our leadership team would like a way to be able

We have been able to accurately track our cost of sales, which provides more sound financial statements. Has allowed us

Efficiency: standard product development process. Efficiency: provide value over cost-time-quality constraints. … Project Insight: straight project planner, no collaboration Rally: too expensive for what we needed JIRA: too many modules to integrate DAPTIV & Innotas: … Innotas:…

no easy way to add or upload financial data to get an idea of the project cost.

Workfront is more expensive, but more robust. Lacks a group writing/editing feature that Podio and