Wrike has helped us increase productivity exponentially
Updated July 14, 2021
Wrike has helped us increase productivity exponentially
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Wrike
It is used by the Customer Experience team for all project deliveries, tracking pipeline, and tracking project risks and issues. Main users are Project managers, engagement managers, project coordinators, and finance.
It addressed a lot of former issues. We needed a single source of truth in tracking project timelines, allocating tasks, and tracking the capacity of project managers. it also made it easier for our monthly reporting.
It addressed a lot of former issues. We needed a single source of truth in tracking project timelines, allocating tasks, and tracking the capacity of project managers. it also made it easier for our monthly reporting.
Pros
- Task management and allocation
- Creating project timelines and gantt charts
- Making it easy to create project templates
- Daily snapshot of to-dos
- Reporting, snapshots of project progress, reporting
- Billable / non billable hours and capacity tracking
Cons
- Communications - email integration (still a bit clunky)
- Producing reports could be better.
- It could be simpler - big learning curve.
- Project Timelines and tracking
- Task allocation
- Time sheeting / billable / non billable hours
- Reporting function for projects and time sheets
- Capacity tracking
- Helped us manage our resourcing better.
- Helped PMs track projects more efficiently and therefore increased productivity.
- Increased project visibility with our HQ giving recognition for our teams' hard work.
- Helped the CX team manage capacity and allocate projects as appropriate
Before we took on Wrike we made a comparison between Wrike, Smartsheet, Teamwork and Monday. Wrike was really the only one that ticked all the boxes (at least for our region) on what we needed. You can say that between them the features are quite similar. What we liked about Wrike was the clean interface, it was relatively easy to use and learn, and that you have a customer service team and offered us a lot of support in giving advice and helping us set up.
Do you think Wrike delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Wrike's feature set?
Yes
Did Wrike live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Wrike go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Wrike again?
Yes
Wrike Feature Ratings
Using Wrike
50 - Delivery, Sales and Finance.
All our Project Managers, Engagement Managers, Project Coordinators are on Wrike
All our Project Managers, Engagement Managers, Project Coordinators are on Wrike
2 - We only have 2 main people who manage our Wrike internally who are the product experts and maintain Wrike. They also liaise directly with Wrike and escalate any issues the group is having. I would say you need the following skills in this role
- Curiosity and a willingness to experiment and explore
- Have a good working knowledge of wrike features and how best to apply them in any situation
- Have a Project Management Certification or Degree. Not essential but nice to have - this will help tremendously in setting up templates and project flows / risks and issues etc.
- Have the ability to explain complex concepts in layman's terms
- Time sheeting and capacity reporting
- Project tracking and timelines
- Task allocation
- Reporting and updates for leaders
- Mapping capacity by Pod
- Assigning projects according to capacity (automations)
- Processing resource requests through wrike
Evaluating Wrike and Competitors
- Price
- Product Features
- Product Usability
As mentioned previously, as compared to the others, the features were almost the same. It was the clean, simple interface, usability and customer service that made us choose Wrike.
Wrike Implementation
- Implemented in-house
Yes - We had a Wrike consultant who brought us through the deployment process.
- Project Kick off Call
- Process mapping
- Workspace Setup
- Workflow Training
- Change Management Prep
- User Training
- Launch preparation and checklist
- Launch
Change management was a small part of the implementation and was well-handled - At the time of initial deployment, change management was not a huge issue as we were a very small team at the time, which worked in our favour. We were able able to tweak the process and implementation as we saw fit, and it wasn't a giant boat to steer. Nowadays with a bigger team, in hindsight it was the right decision that we put processes in place and had a good initial set up - As a small team we could have easily not be "hassled" to take the time in setting up properly. It is also good to have at least 2 people in-house who will be your Wrike "champions" to help newbies navigate the system
- Not knowing where to start / what to do. It was intimidating at first
- We should have done more research on what WE wanted and needed in the beginning
- People not being on one page on what we wanted / needed. Again, this was our issue and Not Wrike
Wrike Support
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Quick Resolution Good followup Knowledgeable team Problems get solved Kept well informed No escalation required Immediate help available Support understands my problem Support cares about my success Quick Initial Response | None |
In the beginning yes. Our team had zero experience in setting up a project management app for the team. We didn't even know where to start! With how integrated Wrike is now with our day to day work it is hard to believe how clueless we were in the beginning. Wrike's help and advice in the beginning really helped set us up for success.
Yes - Yes and no. There were some bugs that were resolved quickly and others that was just how the system is. In fairness they are always evolving and adding new features and fixes.
Using Wrike
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Easy to use Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using | Lots to learn |
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation