Dialpad Ai Meetings is a web conferencing platform with document management capability that integrates with third-party applications such as Google Drive, LinkedIn, Evernote, and Dropbox. It includes features such as screen sharing, call controls, call recording, and a mobile application.
$20
per month
Zoom
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Zoom helps consolidate communications and collaboration in the boardroom, classroom, operating room, and everywhere. Zoom is an intelligent collaboration platform that makes connecting easier, more immersive, and more dynamic. Zoom technology facilitates collaboration through solutions like Zoom Team Chat, Phone, Meetings, omnichannel cloud Contact Center, smart recordings, and Whiteboard.
Zoom definitely has more bells and whistles than Dialpad UberConference and can be cheaper depending on your needs and the size of your team. Furthermore, since Zoom has gained greater popularity during COVID, more people are very familiar with the platform, which gives Zoom …
I like UberConference much more than Webex. While a lot of our external vendors and clients are more familiar with Webex, UberConference is much easier to use and does not require you to download an app. Webex is also pretty clunky and requires you to switch presenters in order …
We've used BrandedBridge, Vonage, GoTo Meeting, Zoom, Blue Jeans, and Microsoft Teams all of which haven't matched Dialpad UberConference's ease of joining and scheduling. Zoom is great for video conferencing but you have you schedule it out and when you have a busy hectic team …
Webex is quite clunky. The user interface is not as simple to use as UberConference and you have to download an app in order to use it on your desktop. Because of this, new users are often late to meetings because of the time it takes to download the app. UberConference doesn't …
UberConference is comparable to the other platforms for conference calls. We use Zoom internally but vendors use it to schedule our demo calls for their products and services.
Uberconference in my opinion is the best software out there. One of the things that makes it especially better than all of the other options is that there is no additional software needed for us our our clients. We used to have so many issues with downloading software and …
UberConference is free and easy to start and invite users to. It lacks the features of other paid options like Zoom and Slack, and even Zoom's free plan can often satisfy many of our requirements over UberConference.
Zoom is the winner of the space in my mind. It has all the features I want, works reliably, and the price is okay. Skype is a dumpster fire, has definite failures, and is a nightmare to admin. Hangouts is only suited to small companies and lacks recording, which is crucial.
Zoom and Cisco both prompt you to install their software, which I don't like. I don't like having to install plugins every time a new person invites me to a call. Uberconference doesn't do that.
Zoom is great for one on one communication and screen sharing, so we often use it for those purposes instead of UberConference. However we always choose UberConference over Google Hangouts, since we've had issues in the past with poor audio and video quality. UberConference …
UberConference is easy to schedule and set up for both me and other parties to the conference. I like that it has an iPhone app, and that it recognizes my various phone numbers. UberConference is far more reliable from a sound quality perspective than ANY of its competitors. …
UberConference and Zoom have overlapping functionality, but not 100%. UberConference does teleconferencing really well - it makes it very easy to call in and collaborate with a group of people. But for screen sharing, Zoom outshines UberConference. Zoom doesn't use as much …
UberConference carries much less administrative overhead than WebEx or GoToMeeting. UberConference's interface is superior to free conference call because you can see who is on the call, mute individuals, and get a tracking report of who spent how much time speaking at the end …
Zoom blew all the others (GoToMeeting, Skype, Google Hangouts, UberConference) out of the water. Free consumer solutions didn't have the reliability, scheduling, privacy, recording, or headcount capabilities that Zoom boasts. GoToMeeting and Webex are old and clunky to use, …
Zoom is much easier to use and has a better-integrated feature set compared to UberConfernce. I feel the layout is a lot more functional and it's easier to use the record, share, mute features on the fly when in a live meeting or call than it is with UberConfernce.
Zoom performs consistently: my team and I don't have to worry about it failing. While the audio can be better, it's not any worse than GoToMeeting (it's better actually) or Skype for Business. It integrates well with our apps (Outlook) and the iOS app performs very nicely. The …
Zoom has every feature they have and more. We selected Zoom because it was the best out there with good ease of use. Also, users know the name and they have a position view of it.
UberConference was the easiest one I've used, but the call quality was terrible which was the main factor behind why we switched. GoToMeeting and Join.me were great solutions as well, but Zoom was next in ease of use. The call quality was the best we found and easiest for …
We found that with other solutions, either the meeting client was buggy (UberConference) or had features we’d never use (WebEx). Zoom was found to be much more cost effective than the other solutions we tested, and the call quality was above the rest.
Zoom has much better quality and less "hang ups" than both Uber Conference and Google Hangouts. Specifically compared to Uber Conference, we often will switch to Zoom midway through a meeting due to the deteriorating quality. Specifically compared to Google Hangouts, we use …
Zoom has overlapping service similarities to UberConference, but they are not all the same. UberConference is what we used prior to Zoom, and it can do teleconferencing and screen sharing, but it does not have video capacity. Zoom has the video conferencing and screen …
Skype is just very unreliable in my opinion. The used to have a lot of quality problems on the calls. UberConference we liked a lot their simple UX approach, the web-hosted structure, and the beautiful UI, but we had multiple call-quality issues as well. We don't have those …
I've generally used Skype less and less over the years... the main reason to do so is that I find the other party uses a different system than me, but we both have Skype accounts. The address book that I've built over the years is probably the main reason that this app is …
It is competitively priced and offers robust functionality. It was an easy decision to use Zoom over these others. Mainly value for the price made it an easy decision. A critical component was reliable connection (audio and visual) and ability to recording capabilities.
I haven't used GoToMeeting for about a year but the functionality seems pretty similar, I remember GoToMeeting having a very robust calendar function and you could add meetings straight from gmail which was really helpful - I haven't seen this with Zoom.
As mentioned previously, I have substantial experience with GoToMeeting, Join.Me, UberConference, and Zoom. Zoom is heads and shoulders above that crowd in my personal opinion. The only reason we considered/tested/used Join.Me and UberConference over Zoom in the first place is …
We used to use UberConference which didn't have video and wasn't customizable in the way that Zoom is for our team. It's just a more professional experience when interacting with customers and that for me is what is more valuable when using a tool like Zoom for customer calls …