Skip to main content
TrustRadius
WebPT

WebPT

Starting at $99 per month per user
View Pricing

Overview

What is WebPT?

Established in 2008, WebPT is an outpatient rehab therapy software platform helping more than 150,000 rehab therapy professionals from all practice sizes and specialties run their practices to improve care delivery and optimize business performance. And because WebPT is a…

Read more
Recent Reviews

PT With A Difference

10 out of 10
March 06, 2024
Incentivized
We've used WebPT as our EMR with good success. It's a great company with great product and very pro PT. Improvements to EBV would be …
Continue reading

WebPT warning

1 out of 10
March 01, 2024
We use this company's EMR. I would definitely not recommend this product. In my experience, the Zoom feature is inconsistently not working …
Continue reading
Read all reviews

Awards

Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards

Reviewer Pros & Cons

View all pros & cons
Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing

Enterprise

Custom Pricing

Cloud

Entry-level set up fee?

  • Setup fee required
    Required
For the latest information on pricing, visithttps://www.webpt.com/pricing

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Starting price (does not include set up fee)

  • $99 per month per user
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is WebPT?

Established in 2008, WebPT is an outpatient rehab therapy software platform helping more than 150,000 rehab therapy professionals from all practice sizes and specialties run their practices to improve care delivery and optimize business performance. And because WebPT is a cloud-based application, PTs, OTs, and SLPs can access the platform (and its data) from anywhere, at any time, promoting collaboration across patient care teams and with third-party payers.

In addition to its flagship EMR, WebPT offers a host of practice management solutions, including:

  • integrated billing software,

  • revenue cycle management services,

  • electronic benefit verification,

  • digital patient intake,

  • patient engagement tools,

  • marketing tools and automation,

  • remote therapeutic monitoring,

  • virtual (telehealth) visits,

  • outcomes tracking,

  • operational reporting and analytics,

  • MIPS reporting,

  • continuing education support, and

  • a marketplace to purchase clinic equipment at discounted prices.

WebPT offers free onboarding and unlimited US-based product and account support. WebPT’s ISO 27001 certification ensures that customers' data is kept safe. WebPT offers system integration with more than 60 vendors as a commitment to healthcare interoperability.


WebPT Features

  • Supported: Electronic Medical Records
  • Supported: Billing
  • Supported: Revenue Cycle Management
  • Supported: Data and Reporting
  • Supported: Digital Patient Intake
  • Supported: Patient Scheduling
  • Supported: Electronic Benefits Verification
  • Supported: Home Exercise Program
  • Supported: Remote Therapeutic Monitoring
  • Supported: Virtual Visits
  • Supported: Outcomes Tracking
  • Supported: MIPS Reporting
  • Supported: Patient Marketing
  • Supported: Patient Engagement
  • Supported: Continuing Education
  • Supported: Marketplace (Equipment, Supplies, Credentialing)

WebPT Screenshots

Screenshot of WebPT Outcomes Tracking & MIPSScreenshot of WebPT AnalyticsScreenshot of WebPT ReachScreenshot of WebPT EMRScreenshot of WebPT EMR2Screenshot of WebPT EMRScreenshot of WebPT EMR2

WebPT Video

Outpatient rehab therapy software that's comprehensive. From the front desk, to charting, to HEP, to billing, to reporting and outcomes.

WebPT Technical Details

Deployment TypesSoftware as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based
Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationApple iOS, Android, Windows Phone, Mobile Web
Supported CountriesUnited States
Supported LanguagesEnglish

WebPT Downloadables

Frequently Asked Questions

WebPT starts at $99.

TherapyRehab Plus by Raintree Systems, TheraOffice, and Systems 4PT are common alternatives for WebPT.

Reviewers rate Implementation Rating highest, with a score of 8.6.

The most common users of WebPT are from Small Businesses (1-50 employees).
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(167)

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-2 of 2)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
All of our clinics use WebPT's EMR, billing, and patient outreach solutions. WebPT works for us for our entire patient process, from intake to discharge. WebPT allows us to receive intake forms electronically, which are added directly to a patient's chart, schedule and send reminders out via email/SMS text, document patient treatment and upload other documents, bill claims and patient statements, receive payments and reach out for automatic follow-ups or satisfaction surveys.
  • Comprehensive scheduling
  • Wholly customizable documentation/templates
  • Self-managed billing & claims
  • Immediate and competent support available by chat
  • Lots of automation for patient contact
  • WebPT's self-managed billing solution (Therabill) can be clunky and disorganized
  • Service outages do happen about once a month or so for 1-3 hours, with limited functionality
  • WebPT's billing department can be slow to respond/fix issues
WebPT is a well-priced comprehensive solution for physical therapy clinics of small-to-midsize. It could use more support for occupational/speech therapy combined clinics and may not be ideal for large businesses that can afford more directly catered solutions. However, it is a stable and multipurpose platform with a great deal of options for PT/OT/ST clinics nonetheless. It allows you and your staff to completely manage the entire patient process digitally and with a great deal of connectivity between different phases of the patient process. This avoids the inefficiencies of relying on paper documentation and communication issues and saves time with the automation available for scheduling and patient outreach.
  • Greatly improved claim billing and appealing efficiency
  • Reliable scheduling with relatively few bugs/dropped appointments
  • Higher technical barrier to entry than alternative methods
  • Highly customizable documentation options, though sometimes too customizable
WebPT has helped us update to modern standards of documentation and record-keeping. Its comprehensive suite of products has kept our workflows streamlined and efficient, while having ample support to help us in the times when things went wrong. Before WebPT we were still doing documentation on paper forms, faxing paper, and billing through antiquated software from the early 2000s. Once we committed to an upgrade, WebPT was great in assigning people to aid in migrating us and getting every bit of data we could keep into WebPT's system. Now we know that our data is secure and organized at all times.
Absolutely, WebPT's connected platform has significantly enhanced our patient experience. One key feature is the ability to send automated text reminders. This drastically reduces no-shows and keeps patients engaged in their care plan. Previously, appointment reminders relied on phone calls, which were time-consuming and less effective. Another great feature is the waitlist function. Patients can now easily add themselves to a waitlist for appointments, ensuring they get scheduled quickly for cancellations. This streamlines scheduling and eliminates the need for them to call constantly to check for openings. These are just a couple of examples of how WebPT's platform has refined the patient experience at our practice.
We were stuck using separate services for scheduling, billing, and processing claims while also still using paper documentation. Having all of our records and services running through one comprehensive platform like WebPT greatly increased efficiency and allowed us to focus more on patient care and growth as a company. The configurability of WebPT has been particularly valuable as our practice has grown. We've been able to easily adapt the platform to our specific needs, such as by customizing automated reports and streamlining our referral process. This adaptability ensures WebPT continues to meet our evolving needs as we provide exceptional care to more patients.
WebPT does notice information that may be missing in the documentation process that would be needed for certain types of coverage, like Medicare. It also comes with a knowledge base that attempts to find explanations of claim rejections and solutions to resolve them. We have greatly trimmed down the amount of manual entry that needs to be done because claim information is pulled directly from the EMR records. This has allowed us to focus entirely on authorization issues and claim denials.
Acuity is a wonderful and cheap scheduling solution that performs many of the same features WebPT's scheduler does, some better and some worse. However, Acuity is definitely designed more for small clinics or other small client-focused businesses. It took a lot of ingenuity to customize it for our use, and in the end, it was only useful for scheduling and appointment reminders. We were previously using Tiger Misys from Allscripts for over 10 years prior to WebPT, and while it was a detailed interface for claim/billing records, it was extremely outdated and not user-friendly at all. It has since been discontinued.
45
Scheduling, patient intake, documentation, billing, claims handling, and authorizations.
45
General computer use skills are needed, but WebPT has a great deal of training material and reference guides provided all along the site to aid in learning its usage. Otherwise we generally just need a couple people who are broad experts on the entire platform for immediate aid, but WebPT also has a chat support at the ready on any part of the site.
  • Scheduling
  • Billing/Claim
  • Documentation
  • Using Reach to send email/text alerts out for sudden closures or other events
  • making custom calendars for students and aides
  • Incorporating the HEP exercises into more treatments
  • Allowing for patient self-scheduling
  • Using Reach for more patient outreach
We are fully integrated with WebPT. While we could transfer to other services, we are so far quite satisfied with all the features available for the cost we pay. We will absolutely continuing renewing our subscription with WebPT and will likely do so for years, unless some major change were to get in the way of things.
Yes
We previously used Acuity Scheduling (a Square service) for calendars/scheduling patients and Tiger Misys and Payerpath through Allscripts for claims management and billing. Acuity was alright but not built for a company of our size. Whereas Tiger Misys was being reaching end-of-life so we had to migrate to a new service regardless.
  • Scalability
  • Integration with Other Systems
  • Ease of Use
The most important feature was how comprehensive and well-integrated WebPT is with its other related services. We needed a service that could integrate with a claims billing system. WebPT and Therabill integrate seamlessly to allow for sessions in WebPT to carry over in Therabill for billing. This simplifies our workflow tremendously.
Onboarding felt a bit rushed. There were questions we had that got answers to, but were not able to verify until much later, whereby we discovered some features we were told of were not implemented or not available. Our migration was pretty big, so it took longer than most clinics do for them, but even so it would have been better to be allotted more time with our onboarding specialist to get everything completely up and ready.
We were transitioning from paper documentation and billing through software that could only export data in a formatted .txt document. That meant any migration of data was going to be a massive pain. However, our assigned migration support from WebPT stuck with us throughout the entire ordeal and even would take on some of the work I had to do in formatting data to try and get us fully transitioned over without stress.
  • Implemented in-house
  • Converting formatted .txt files into Excel databases
  • Cleaning the data to ensure accuracy
  • Combining data from different sources into one spreadsheet
  • scanning paper charts
  • Online Training
WebPT has its entire separate platform for training, containing many different guides, tutorials, and video references to help you become familiar and competent with the software suites. This includes having various demonstrations that allow you to click and navigate pages in the ways you would actually do it in WebPT.

WebPT also gives you a sandbox company in the actual website to tinker with and trial things out. This makes it easy to catch and avoid errors you would have otherwise made with active patient data/schedules.
I'd rate WebPT's support a 9. A major reason for this high rating is their friendly and knowledgeable chat support, available throughout business hours. Whenever we've had a question, connecting with a representative through chat has been quick and easy. The support staff consistently provides clear and helpful solutions, minimizing downtime and ensuring our clinic operations run smoothly.
WebPT does not have premium support. They offer their best support with the baseline subscription.
Yes
Throughout the few years we've been on WebPT, we've experienced various bugs. An update will come out, and at times a small bug will come with it. Fortunately, even without reporting it immediately, these issues are often fixed within the business day, if not within an hour or two. WebPT's support works diligently to solve any issue we report, even if they can't fix it right away and have to escalate the issue.
One area where WebPT's support truly shines is with complex billing issues. We sometimes encounter those frustrating "kickback errors" containing technical jargon that's beyond our expertise. For instance, we recently received an error referencing an obscure EDI loop and segment issue.

Their billing support team not only understood the technical language but also quickly diagnosed the problem. They explained the issue in clear, understandable terms and walked us through the steps to resolve it. This not only saved us valuable time but also prevented further claim denials. Their expertise and willingness to explain the technical aspects were invaluable, making them a true partner in our billing success.
The platform is incredibly intuitive and user-friendly. Even new staff members can quickly navigate the system and become proficient thanks to the clean interface and logical organization. This minimizes training time and ensures everyone can efficiently utilize WebPT's features to deliver excellent patient care. Furthermore, WebPT offers comprehensive resources and tutorials readily available within the platform, providing additional support whenever needed.
  • Sending/collecting intake forms to patients
  • scheduling overall
  • customizing documentation templates
  • submitting corrected claims (in Therabill)
  • resubmitting multiple claims (in Therabill)
  • writing off remaining balances in ERAs (in Therabill)
No
Kenji Carp | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 1 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We currently use WebPT for our online patient intake, scheduling, EMR, billing, clinical outcomes, and patient engagement.
  • Medicare compliance
  • Limited business analytics
  • Patient engagement
  • Customer service
  • Support
  • Clinician time to document in EMR
  • Integration of objective data to assessment of goals
  • Communication with subscribers
  • Accountability
  • Integrity
I am a 15 year user of WebPT including their patient intake, scheduling, EMR, HEP, clinical outcomes, and patient engagement modules. Until recently I was a proud and loyal WebPT consumer. However, my team experienced an extremely high volume of recurrent technical issues during all of 2022 and continued into 2023. We promptly brought these to the attention of WebPT's support team and were frankly not impressed with their communication, technical solutions, or promptness in resolving the issues. When we experienced a clear pattern of the same support issues occurring across multiple different patient accounts we emailed, called, and took Zoom meetings with out "Success Manager". When WebPT still did not address our concerns I took a live in person meeting with a WebPT "Member Success Manager" at the American Physical Therapy Association Combined Sections Meeting to in San Diego to again voice my strong concerns about the poor functionality of the software, related poor support, and negative impact on my clinic finances and morale. Per their request I emailed to re-iterate the same information to the "Success Leader". The subsequent Zoom meeting with the WebPT management was simply the most disappointing experience I have experienced with any vendor in 23 years of clinical practice, 20 years of clinic leadership, and 13 years of private practice. I next attempted to contact Ashley Glover, CEO of WebPT who I met at the Combined Sections Meeting. When I did not receive any communication I felt it was reasonable to reach out to my personal and professional friend Heidi Janega the founder of WebPT and was told Mrs. Golver would be in touch. I have yet to hear from her. During the meetings I described I was told my complaints were not valid and that the support issues were fixed. If the same issue occurs across numerous patient accounts is absolutely not fixed. Rather it is a recurring pattern that negatively impacts patient care, business efficiency, and the work/life balance of our team. It was also clear they had not reviewed the information they mandated I provide prior to the meeting or their own notes on the numerous support issues. I was also told WebPT is not the same company as before and that we may not be a good fit for them. Well, we may finally have a point we agree on. WebPT may now feel they are too big to fail but I can tell you they may be big enough to fail your clinic.
  • Poor functionality of online patient intake negatively impacts ROI
  • Poor technical support negatively impacts ROI
  • Poor customer service negatively impacts employee work/life balance and possibly employee retention
  • WebPT billing positively impacts clean claim rates and reimbursement
  • WebPT outcomes tracking improves evidenced based practice
  • WebPT integrates Medicare compliance
Previously they were our greatest partner. Currently we are disappointed in their service.
Front end - consistent problems with online patient intake leading to more work for our administrative and clinical team and some patient complaints

Middle - EMR evaluative notes take a long time which negatively impacts productivity and employee work/life balance. In EMR flow sheets do not integrate with WebPT HEP. Again frequent technical issues, poor support and related customer service did not deliver on WebPT's brand promises

Back end - WebPT Reach is a powerful tool to retain and market your existing clients and leverage this into positive online reviews to gain new clients
9
Clinical - Owner/Director, Staff Physical Therapists, Staff Physical Therapy Assistants

Administrative - Clinic Business Manager, Asst Manager, and Admin support. Patient intake, insurance authorization, scheduling, claims submission, billing, collections
3
In 2022-23 all three of our administrative team were constantly in communication with WebPT support to attempt to resolve the numerous problems described in this review.
  • Patient intake
  • EMR
  • Outcomes
  • Billing
  • Patient engagement
  • Telehealth - WebPT integration of Zoom sustained us during the worst of COVID-19
  • WebPT Reach produces tangible marketing results
  • Remote patient managing
See review
No
  • Cloud Solutions
  • Scalability
  • Integration with Other Systems
  • Other
The most important factor was PT specific EMR versus a multi-disciplinary EMR which often does not meet our needs
I am currently re-evaluating my choice of Physical Therapy enterprise softwares. I remain committed to a Physical Therapy specific platform. I am now looking for a company with better technical support, customer services, and agility to respond to the rapidly changing needs of modern healthcare.
Our initial implementation of WebPT scheduling and EMR 15 years ago was straightforward and easy. Implementation of WebPT billing in approximately 2018 was challenging but WebPT provided support and good customer service at that time and made it right. Implementation of of online patient intake and outcomes modules have been problematic. WebPT support was poor as was the related customer service including our attempts with 4 levels of escalation.
  • Implemented in-house
Yes
EMR, scheduling at inception of our private practice then added billing, HEP, outcomes, and online patient intake modules over 13 year period with WebPT.
Change management was minimal
Previously we learned WebPT provided much needed infrastructure and feeling of security for our team during changes in health care. WebPT was the core of our clinical and administrative team functions and a mode of team communication. WebPT was our most trusted partner that we relied on to tackle industry wide changes such as decreasing reimbursement, abuse of utilization management, Medicare compliance, employee work/life balance. WebPT is now a source of stress for all my team members and is causing changes we have to manage locally.
  • Frequent failures in functionality of software
  • Poor support
  • Poor customer service
  • Online Training
Used to have more synchronous support during training. Now mostly online modules and pop ups. We have noticed DPT and PTA students have more difficulty navigating the online training as compared to 2020.
Configurability too limited. Templates helped a little but remain bulky and hard to navigate when charting. For example, It is not possible to add back a single a la carte test if you did not select the related suite of tests and measures in the template. We have recurrent problems with configurations we selected shifting back to default options. For example, we configured EMR to NOT display minutes boxes on untimed CPT codes and not for any codes on non-Medicare/federal clients as this facilitates correct/productive billing, improves productivity, and improves team work/life balance. WebPT has spontaneously lost this configuration repeatedly. i.e. clinicians could had to enter minutes in a box for untimed codes such as PT Evaluation or Re-evaluation. This is incorrect as by definition they are untimed codes. It also increases charting time as they can not close the note, ask admin to forward the issue to WebPT support. In turn this decrease productivity and work/life balance (and possibly employee retention). Likewise, minutes boxes often (currently in my clinic) pop up for non-medicare/federal clients. This causes clinical staff to incorrectly apply Medicare guidelines to non-Medicare clients. Again incorrect, negatively impacts revenue, costs me staffing time to lodge the recurrent problems with support, and makes all 9 team members doubt the functionality and reliability of WebPT.
I have previously volunteered my time to help WebPT develop Vestibular templates. I have offered many recommendations to WebPT about best practices both functions in EMR, HEP, support and customer service. I was told point blank by multiple levels of "Success Managers" they are not interested.
Yes - we have customized the interface extensively
We customized evaluation and flowsheet templates to improve efficiency of charting. We customized billing section of EMR to improve correct CPT code selection, compliance with Medicare and private insurance guidelines, and improve visual clutter for clinicians.
No - the product does not support adding custom code
No
See narrative review
I do not believe "premium support" is an option with WebPT. I would not purchase premium support as an option because excellent support should be available for any service I pay to subscribe to.
Yes
No. This is my core issues with WebPT support and related very poor customer service.
Prior to COVID-19 WebPT had problems with their roll out of WebPT billing. We brought this to their attention, they provided support, and made it right financially. Their current level of support is far from exceptional. Of all the vendors I partner with to meet my clinic business needs they are currently the worst.
Online patient intake - frequent functionality problems. WebPT supports solutions to these problems are often work arounds requiring my local admin team to enter data on our end. This prompts the question - why am I paying you for this function if we end up doing intake again. Patient intake and outcomes should not be separate emails to the patient. They find it redundant and are less likely to complete both. It is also entirely possible that this impacts their responses on survey based outcomes measures, possibly skewing outcomes data.

Outcomes - also frequently fails, patient's complete on their device or kiosk/tablet in clinic but will not sync to EMR and populate chart note. Again frequent "solution" from WebPT support involves work arounds requiring admin team staffing hours. Again additional expense of admin team staffing.

Scheduling - frequent problems with lost appointments booked leading to decreased productivity and a customer service issue we have to resolve. Waitlist feature recently improved.

EMR - evaluative notes are slow and difficult for clinicians to enter data. Evaluation templates have improved this a bit but it is still to difficult to add single tests and measures to existing initial evaluations and progress notes. Flowsheets do not save clinicians time with current functionality. You can not see what treatments were provided at the previous visit from the flow sheet view. This slows treatment and frustrates clinicians.

WebPT HEP - does not integrate with Flow Sheet in EMR creating redundant process in charting.


  • Goal % progression
  • WebPT Reach
  • Evaluative notes
  • Flowsheet
  • HEP
  • Online patient intake
  • Outcomes
Yes
WebPT does not have a specific mobile interface but as their name implies works on all web connected devices. It does not scale to smart phone devices well. For example the data entry box for username and password is obscured/does not scale to fit iPhone screen. The schedule view has several function available when you hover the mouse over a patient appointment when on iMac or Macbook pro which does not appear available with iPad, iPad mini, and iPhones.
It grew with us from practice inception to our largest size of 12 employees.
Entire suite down numerous times in 2022 and 2023. Individual modules down as well. Modules rated as operational but not functioning numerous times, most so with scheduling, online intake, and outcomes.
Pages often load slowly. Our iMacs are highly reliable and we are connected to the highest speed Comcast business internet. We also connected each iMac via Cat 9 cable during COVID-19 pandemic to speed telelhealth appointments. Zoom does integrate very well with WebPT for telehealth. Their own modules do not integrate well with each other. For example, patients receive separate emails for patient intake and clinical outcomes. If confuses and frustrates many patients. Similarly, EMR flow sheet does not integrate with HEP creating redundancy.
WebPT integrates with Zoom well to offer telehealth PT. It does not integrate it's own modules well. Online patient intake does not integrate with clinical outcomes so patient's must respond to two separate emails. This often leads to poor compliance completing the online forms and often patient complaints to our admin and clinical team. HEP does not integrate with Flowsheet creating redundant data entry.
  • Zoom
Depth of Zoom integration is very good. It was not difficulty to achieve. We are able to invite patients, conduct HIPPA compliant, secure telehealth visits directly from the WebPT dashboard. This is one aspect I have to acknowledge WebPT did well and quickly during the worst of the COVID-19 crisis. It helped our team continue to help our patients and kept our business alive during a very stressful period.
  • Microfet dynomometry
  • iPhone/Pad video capture
  • Video Nystagmography
No
  • File import/export
No
Treat your customer better. Listen to their input as to how you can improve. Honor your published values and brand promises. Then integrate with other platforms. For example, I am well aware remote therapeutic monitoring is a potential new source of revenue in a shrinking reimbursement field. However, I have absolutely no interest in Keet unless you make the modules I already pay you for work reliably and show more respect for our loyalty and the revenue you get from my organization.
WebPT was very easy to work with when selling new modules/services.
WebPT simply has not delivered on their brand promises. My leadership team agrees the customer services and relationship with WebPT over the 2022-2023 period is the worst we have experienced in our combined 43 years of healthcare experience.
Extremely poor technical support and customer service.
WebPT is a subscription service format for users of the software and collects a % based fee of all account receivable collected. They mentioned repeatedly they will transition to contracts with different rates and methods of monetizing in the future. However, no actual firm details were provided despite direct questions from our team.
The current terms and pricing would be fair if they provided adequate performance, reliability, support, and customer service. As they have lapsed in these areas WebPT is overpriced. I would not recommend any PT practice of any size agree to a long term contract with WebPT until they prove they will deliver on their promises.
Per WebPT's instructions take screen captures of the numerous technical problems you will encounter across the majority of their modules. This will improve your speed of submission WebPT support tickets. It does not appear to improve their support, communication, or service.
Yes
The transition to WebPT billing in approximately 2018 did not go smoothly and involved downtime, poor function, and negatively impacted productivity and revenue. However, at that time they did work with us, resolved the problems, and made it right.

The transition to SOAP 2.0, online patient intake, and clinical outcomes did not go smoothly. It felt and still often feels like an extended Beta trial. Technical support remains lacking.
  • When it works clinical outcomes modules enhances EBP
  • Our organization will not make any elective upgrades with WebPT until they deliver on the modules we already pay for
No
Yes
We added modules as we grew. Started with EMR and scheduling. Then added billing, HEP, outcomes, WebPT reach, and online patient intake. SOAP 2.0, online patient intake, and outcomes went poorly.
Return to navigation