The Webex App brings together Webex Calling, Meetings, and Messaging into a single application, fostering collaboration and unlocking more productive ways to work.
$0
user/month
Webex Meetings
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Webex Meetings is a video conferencing solution powering hybrid work. It enables a seamless collaboration experience and better results with meetings that are designed to give everyone the ability to engage no matter their location, language, or communication style.
$11.95
per month
Pricing
Webex App
Webex Meetings
Editions & Modules
Basic Plan
$0.00
user/month
Meet Plan
$13.50
user/month
Meet + Call Plan
$25.00
user/month
Enterprise Plan
Contact Sales
Webex Free
$0.00
user/month
Webex Meet
$14.50
user/month
Webex Suite: Meet + Call Plan
$25.00
user/month
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Webex App
Webex Meetings
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
Optional
Additional Details
—
Webex Meetings are available at no cost to users. They are included in the Webex Suite, starting at $11.95 per user/per month for Enterprise Agreements.
Webex Teams is a good trade-off of features and ease of use. When compared to Slack, the licensing fees are better when you have a large number of users. The chat and video call features are similar to Webex Teams feeling like a more mature product. We still have an Adobe Connect…
Pretty much the same. But Webex Teams seemed to run a bit smoother (take less local resources) than Microsoft Teams did. So that was a pretty good selling point. Also, it's kinds of a Skype vs. Webex Meetings question. Because obviously Webex Teams works great with Webex …
Webex (formerly Webex Teams) is a very easy to use and understand tool. It can be compared and used together with Webex Meetings, and if you want more security, you can use Cisco AnyConnect. All Cisco products can coexist with each other and work very simply without …
Cisco Jabber prevails over the Skype for Business option, particularly in those organizations where Cisco infrastructure exists, such as the Communications Manager suite, voice gateways and brand devices that use services for the PSTN, since integrations and interoperability …
Security aspects applied in all ways of communications, as voice, chat and video, as well as collaboration when you must escalate from a chat discussion to a meeting, or when sharing a document on line or you screen, Webex App offers it natively. Your content is protected, no …
I still actually use both MS/Cisco Teams daily. I've been doing so long it almost feels natural and I mostly have muscle memory as to which contacts are on which platform. Teams between Cisco and MSFT have a similar look and feel but you definitely notice a much tighter …
We really haven't used or evaluated any other products that compare to Webex (formerly Cisco Spark / Webex Teams) so I can't really compare them. We chose Webex Teams because I tried the free one for a while and when they included it with Webex Meetings it was a no brainer! It …
Zoom and Slack are the go-to platforms in our industry. People just know how to use them when they come into our company because they've been exposed to market share before. That wasn't the case with Cisco Jabber. It felt like a rarity. I keep saying it's a smaller player among …
I think Teams is more seamlessly integrated for functions within Teams, and certainly requires less customer expertise, as most of the heavy lifting is in the Webex cloud. I think that Skype integrates better for traditional federations as Teams really has no native solution …
It has more features, a LOT more security, ROI is in the region of up to 10x cheaper than our existing PBXes that are at sites. The Spaces and Teams set up is very easy to do, the extended features, once enabled, are even more so. The fact you can also manage it from a web …
The optimized and low use of the bandwidth is easy to install and there is a version for PCs and another version for smartphones.
Verified User
Employee
Chose Webex App
Webex App has now integrated the above mentioned into their workflow allowing us to use one tool instead of multiple. We found previous tools in our environment out-dated and decided to move to webex and become an inhouse all webex shop.
I just started using this, but it doesn't seem as intuitive as Webex App. The presence status of others is hard to identify/understand. Also, the sync with the application on the mobile device seems not to work properly. It dropped the call I was in through my desktop once I …
Webex App is more integrated with our webex video devices and on-premise CUCM PBX solution and offers better way how to communicate with external participants - customers without the need to use multiple user accounts or instances of the app.
All of them are similar, the main advantage is using the whole Cisco stack, they integrate easy with a variety of Cisco products. And what makes them shine is the API integration with external tools for task automation.
The interface is way friendlier not only for the end user but for the admin. The console is super intuitive that even someone like me that had zero technical background was able to master the administration.
Webex Meetings integrates with other Webex products like Slido increasing our engagement and making the meetings or sessions more interactive. Additionally, the virtual backgrounds are highly customisable and the video and audio quality are better than that of other …
Webex Meetings meets or exceeds all other tools I've used in the past, both for call quality and tools/options. Some other tools have security issues, or lower tools and option sets, or are more difficult to navigate and use. Webex Meetings has it all and gets it done with ease.
We selected Cisco (including Webex meetings) because we had a Cisco on-prem UC platform that integrates to the Webex app which includes meetings. This allowed us to leverage our existing voice investment and have a single app for voice messaging and meetings.
WebEx meetings have been out long before the beginning of Covid 19. Therefore, it is a product that has been used by many industries in the past, and not just after the pandemic. in WebEx meetings, it is easy to schedule meetings, it is easy to share screens, and it is easy to …
I am not a big fan of Zoom but used for some ceremonies. Looks like some old tech, and I feel like it is not secure enough. Webex Meetings look more decent and authenticated, and more secure. CGI uses Teams for all their meetings; it's as good as Webex Meetings.
Verified User
Employee
Chose Webex Meetings
I prefer Webex Meetings vs. Microsoft Teams. I feel like there are better features with Webex. The customers are like most of us, when they have to switch to a new platform (i.e. from MS Teams to Webex) is learning curve and big adjustment. They find features they like and …
My old company used to use a different tool for collab, but when I came to my new role they were using Webex teams and calling. This was so much more easier to navigate. I liked being able to be on the run and still answering calls and attending meetings.
I think Webex is the superior product to both Microsoft and Zoom. Microsoft's interface is confusing and the meetings are difficult to join. Zoom's interface seems unfinished and unprofessional like it is designed for consumers and is not appropriate for a business setting.
I think the main point is easy to use, without much complexity, along with proper and easy-to-follow documentation. Other tools that we have used and integrate with had higher complexity with not very proper documentation.
Webex has better integration capabilities than Zoom, including with other Cisco collaboration tools that we also use. It’s also more visually simple, which makes onboarding easier for new users, and encourages further use among existing colleagues. Webex meetings are also …
Zoom and Google Meet are really very good tools but, for me, Webex is the safest and most reliable of all. The support Webex offers is unmatched by other vendors.
We have deployed Webex Meetings as a BlueJeans replacement. Besides offering us the option to license very user at our university, including students, faculty, and staff this gives us other perks when coupled with the SPK-EDU offering Cisco has. We never owned licensing nearly …
We still use Cisco Webex Teams but not for scheduling meetings. Microsoft Outlook is still more dependable. They have also enhanced Teams a lot and it's a lot to learn.
Maintains security at all times, so that information is not shared and no one can enter without identifying themselves--a useful tool for communication, screen sharing, recording session, writing comments, in addition to which it allows to have either on PC or cell phone, which …
Verified User
Analyst
Chose Webex Meetings
All tools are good, yet cisco offers broader extensibility and products. However, for an educational setting, I would stress that you need a single app that is fully adapted and customized for educational needs (having Meetings, Teams, Events, etc., causes confusion).
Teams (formerly Cisco Spark) is a little more social/collaboration, and while you can tie in meetings, I find it's better just to use WebeEx Meetings rather than Teams.
Zoom is quick to pick up and put down. It seems to have some pretty lucrative features for similar capabilities as Webex Meetings. I have not tested their connector for allowing SIP calls into their meetings, but the main issue there is their pricing model for doing so.